Representasi Kekuasaan dalam Pidato Menteri Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi

  • Ilham Ilham UNM
  • Anshari Anshari Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Johar Amir Universitas Negeri Makassar
Keywords: Pengalaman, kosakata, tuturan

Abstract

This study aims to describe the shape and form of representation of power in the speech of the Minister of Education, Culture, Research and Technology by using social change analysis from Norman Fairclough. The focus of this research is text analysis, text production, and sociocultural analysis with data in the form of power vocabulary. This research is a discourse analysis study in the form of critical discourse analysis (AWK). The source of the data for this study is the online media site Kemdikbud.go.id which contains the text of the speech including words, clauses and sentences. The research data were obtained by documentation, reading, and note-taking techniques. The results of the study show that there are features in the vocabulary of power that have experiential value in that they contain ideological words that are fought for, lexical processes, and the use of metaphors as a form of representation of power through language in the Minister of Education and Culture's speech. From a review of text production and socio-culture, it also shows that the production of discourse in speech is inseparable from aspects of power and domination. Both domination and power in groups or individuals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Castells, M. 2009. Communication. New York: Oxford University Inc.

Creswell, W. John. 2015. Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset. Edisi ke 3. Diterjemahkan

oleh: Ahmad Lintang Lazuardi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Eriyanto. 2001. Analisis Wacana: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media.

Yogyakarta: LKiS.

Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. New York: Logman Group UK Limited.

Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Language and Power. Diterjemahkan Oleh Indah Rohmani

dengan judul Language and Power: Relasi Bahasa, Kekuasaan, dan Ideologi. Malang:

Boyan Publishing.

Foucault, Michael.1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972-

New York: Pantheon Books.

Giles, Judy & Middleton, T. 1999. Studying Culture: A Practical Introduction. Oxford:

Blackwell Publisher.

Hall, Stuart. 2003. Representation: Cultural Representation and signifying practices.

London: Sage Publication.

Jorgensen, Marianne W dan Louise Philips. 2010. “Discourse Analysis; Theory and Method”.

Diterjemahkan oleh Iman Suyitno dkk, dengan judul; Analisis Wacana: Teori dan

Metode. Cet 5; Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Jumadi. 2005. “Representasi Power dalam Wacana Kelas (Kajian Etnografi Komunikasi di

SMAN 1 Malang)”. Disertasi. Malang: PPs UM.

Santoso, Anang. 2012. Studi Bahasa Kritis: Menguak Bahasa Membongkar Kuasa.

Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Sugyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan

R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Thomas, Linda, and Shan Wareing (eds.). 1999. Language, Society andPower.

New York: Routledge.

Utama. Mahsun. 2007. Metode Penelitian Bahasa : Tahapan Strategi, Metode, dan

Tekniknya. Edisi Revisi 3. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Widjojo, Muridan S dan M Noorsalim. 2004. Bahasa Negara Versus Bahasa Gerakan

Mahasiswa: Kajian Semiotik atas Teks-Teks Pidato Presiden Soeharto dan

Selebaran Gerakan Mahasiswa. Yogyakarta. LIPI Pres

Published
28-10-2023
How to Cite
Ilham, I., Anshari, A., & Johar Amir. (2023). Representasi Kekuasaan dalam Pidato Menteri Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 9(2), 1423-1436. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v9i2.2363
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>