ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN KURIKULUM SINGAPURA DAN INDONESIA: KURIKULUM NASIONAL DAN MATEMATIKA
https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v10i4.7731
Keywords:
Kurikulum, Matematika, Indonesia, SingapuraAbstract
Penelitian ini membandingkan kurikulum nasional dan kurikulum matematika Indonesia dan Singapura melalui analisis dokumen resmi, buku teks, serta literatur akademik. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa kurikulum Singapura berorientasi pada kompetensi, menekankan kedalaman konsep, pemecahan masalah tingkat tinggi, serta struktur spiral yang sistematis. Buku teks matematika Singapura memuat soal non-rutin, representasi variatif, dan pendekatan Concrete–Pictorial–Abstract (CPA), sehingga mendukung kemampuan berpikir kritis dan pemahaman konseptual siswa. Sebaliknya, kurikulum Indonesia, meskipun melalui Kurikulum Merdeka telah memberi ruang fleksibilitas, masih menghadapi tantangan berupa implementasi yang tidak merata, kedalaman materi yang terbatas, dominasi soal prosedural, serta kesiapan guru yang belum optimal. Perbedaan kualitas buku teks dan pendekatan didaktik tampak berkontribusi pada kesenjangan capaian internasional kedua negara, di mana Singapura konsisten unggul dalam asesmen PISA sementara Indonesia masih berada di bawah rata-rata OECD. Temuan ini menegaskan perlunya penguatan desain kurikulum, peningkatan kualitas buku ajar, serta pengembangan kompetensi guru sebagai langkah strategis untuk memperkuat pembelajaran matematika dan meningkatkan daya saing pendidikan Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Dalimunthe, P. C., Ash-Shiddiqy, A. R., Indah, N. L., Siregar, K. Z., Muliana, Hasibuan, P. S. K., & Priscarina, R. (2025). Perbandingan Sistem Pendidikan Indonesia dan Singapura: Tinjauan Literatur dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kualitas Pendidikan Nasional. KNOWLEDGE : Jurnal Inovasi Hasil Penelitian Dan Pengembangan, 5(2), 321–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51878/knowledge.v5i2.5408
Fan, L., Cheng, J., Xie, S., Luo, J., Wang, Y., & Sun, Y. (2021). Are textbooks facilitators or barriers for teachers ’ teaching and instructional change ? An investigation of secondary mathematics teachers in Shanghai , China. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(6), 1313–1330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01306-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01306-6
Guntur, M. I. S., & Maharani, F. (2025). Comparative Study of Mathematics Education in Indonesia , Singapore and England ( United Kingdom ). Realita : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kebudayaan Islam, 23(01), 55–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30762/realita.v23i1.522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30762/realita.v23i1.522
Hendriyanto, A., & Dahlan, J. A. (2023). Praxeology review : Comparing Singaporean and Indonesian textbooks in introducing the concept of sets. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12953 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12953
Lisarani, V., Parta, I. N., & Chandra, T. D. (2018). A Comparative Analysis of the Tasks from the Selected Mathematics Textbooks of Singapore and Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 6(4), 94–99.
Manopo, & Lisarani, V. (2021). A Comparative Analysis of Non-Routine Problems in Mathematics Textbooks of Indonesia and Singapore. EDUMATIKA: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v4i1.75 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32939/ejrpm.v4i1.750
Manopo, & Rahajeng, R. (2020). Analisis Perbandingan Soal Hots dari Buku Ajar Matematika. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2759, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v8i1.9164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v8i2.9164
Meijustika, R., Susanti, L. R. R., Gulo, F., & Safitri, E. R. (2024). A comparison of the Indonesian and Singaporean education systems. Journal of Education Research, 5(4), 5659–5665. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.1900 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v5i4.1900
Ministry of Education Singapore. (2023). Desired Outcomes of Education. https://www.moe.gov.sg/education-in-sg/desired-outcomes
Ministry of Education Singapore. (2025). Ministry of Education. https://www.moe.gov.sg/
Novianty, C. A., & Nurjanah. (2025). Perbandingan Kurikulum Pembelajaran Matematika Antara Indonesia, Singapura, Jepang, China, Korea Selatan dan Finlandia (dalam Kurikulum Merdeka). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.33087/phi.v9i1.426 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33087/phi.v9i1.426
Purnomo, Y. W., Julaikah, A. A., Candra, G., & Hapsari, A. (2024). A Comparison of Angle Problems in Indonesian and Singaporean Elementary School Mathematics Textbooks. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal Winter 2024, 15(6).
Sumliyah, & Junaedi, I. (2025). Mathematical Literacy : A Comparative Analysis of School Mathematics Curricula in Indonesia , Singapore , and China. Inovasi Matematika (Inomatika), 7(1), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.35438/inomatika.v7i1.488 DOI: https://doi.org/10.35438/inomatika.v7i1.488
Wang, Z., & Leung, F. K. S. (2025). Comparison of secondary mathematics textbooks on the topic of equations in Australia, China, Singapore, England, and the United States. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 57, 951–961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01712-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01712-0
Yang, D., & Sianturi, I. A. (2017). An Analysis of Singaporean versus Indonesian Textbooks Based on Trigonometry Content. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 8223(7), 3829–3848. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00760a DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00760a
Zakiah, N. E., Suryadi, D., & Suhendra. (2025). Didactic Praxeological Analysis of Indonesian and Singaporean Mathematics Textbooks: Mathematical Practices in Transformation Geometry. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 26(April), 905–923. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v26i2.pp905-923 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa.v26i2.pp905-923
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pedagogy : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
