EXPLORING VISUAL PROBABILISTIC REASONING: A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ PROBLEM-SOLVING IN PROBABILITY
https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v10i2.6172
Keywords:
Probabilistic Reasoning, Problem Solving in Probability, Visual Mathematical RepresentationAbstract
Understanding students' probabilistic reasoning is crucial in developing effective instructional strategies for probability learning, as probability concepts often pose challenges for many students. This study employs a qualitative descriptive research design to explore the probabilistic reasoning processes of junior high school students in solving probability problems. The research focuses on three selected students who exhibit varying levels of reasoning ability. Data were gathered through think-aloud protocols, in-depth interviews, and analysis of students' written task worksheets. The think-aloud method allowed capturing students' cognitive processes during problem-solving, while interviews provided further insight into their reasoning patterns. Worksheets were used to confirm the accuracy and completeness of their solutions. Data analysis involved systematic coding and thematic categorization based on three key probabilistic reasoning indicators: Identifying, Conjecturing, and Constructing. Triangulation of multiple data sources enhanced the credibility and validity of the findings. The results reveal that students predominantly use visual probabilistic reasoning, especially through factor tree representations, and fulfill all three reasoning indicators. This study underscores the need for varied teaching approaches to improve students' conceptual understanding and flexible application of probability concepts in mathematics education.
Downloads
References
Bakker, A., & Rosén, P. (2021). Probability education and uncertainty: Preparing students for societal decision-making. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108(1), 1–8.
Batanero, C., Chernoff, E. J., Engel, J., Lee, H. S., & Sánchez, E. (2016). Teaching and learning stochastic processes. Springer.
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods (5th ed.). Pearson.
Chernoff, E. J., & Zazkis, R. (2017). Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives. Springer.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Hidayanti, H., & Afifah, I. (2020). Profil berpikir probabilistik siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah geometri. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 5(2), 81–92.
Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Mooney, E. S., & Thornton, C. A. (1999). Students’ probabilistic thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(5), 487–519.
Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Thornton, C. A., & Mooney, E. S. (2007). Developing probabilistic reasoning in elementary school students. Springer.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage.
Kusumaningrum, D., & Hidayah, N. (2022). Pengembangan kemampuan penalaran matematis melalui pembelajaran probabilitas berbasis masalah di sekolah menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 10(2), 113-124.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
Nilsson, P. (2020). Students’ use of intuitive strategies in probabilistic reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(4), 673–691.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
Putri, R. F., & Santosa, R. (2023). Analisis proses berpikir siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal peluang menggunakan metode think-aloud. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 45-58.
Sari, I. P., Budayasa, I. K., & Juniati, D. (2017). Profil penalaran probabilistik siswa dalam menyelesaikan tugas probabilitas. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 2(1), 64–71.
Sari, N. M., & Wahyuni, S. (2021). Pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis investigasi terhadap kemampuan penalaran probabilistik siswa SMA. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 234-245.
Sharma, S. (2012). Cultural influences in probabilistic thinking. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 24(1), 15–33.
Sujadi, I. (2008). Pengembangan kemampuan berpikir probabilistik siswa. Universitas Negeri Surakarta.
Watson, J. M. (2017). Probability reasoning in the context of the school curriculum. In E. J. Chernoff & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Probabilistic Thinking. Springer.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.