BAGAIMANA PEMIKIRAN KREATIF SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN SOAL ASESMEN NASIONAL?: RISET STUDI PADA WILAYAH TENGAH INDONESIA

https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v9i2.4926

Authors

  • Muhammad ikram Jurusan Matematika, Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam

Keywords:

Pemikiran Kreatif, Asesmen Nasional, Pemecahan Masalah

Abstract

Beragam permasalahan yang dialami siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah Asesmen Nasional, salah satunya adalah minimnya pemikiran kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah. Namun, masih sedikit peneliti yang berfokus pada pemikiran kreatif yang dikaitkan dengan penyelesaian masalah Asesmen Nasional. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai sejaumana pemikiran kreatif siswa dalam memecahkan soal asesmen nasional. Metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan deskriptif digunakan untuk menjawab permasalahan. Kami melibatkan tiga siswa yang dipilih secara ketat untuk mewakili tiga kategori pemikiran kreatif. Lebih lanjut, kami menggunakan instrumen tes berpikir kreatif, soal asesmen nasional, dan pedoman wawancara. Analisis data melibatkan tahapan kondensasi, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Dari hasil penelitian, kami menemukan tiga gambaran pemikiran kreatif yang berbeda dari masing-masing kategori yang dipaparkan secara detail. Selain itu, implikasi dan rekomendasi penelitian ini memberikan wawasan terkait pentinganya menstimulus pemikiran kreatif dalam aktivitas pembelajaran.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adawiyah, R., & Prihandini, R. M. (2023). Pendampingan Pendidik dalam Pengembangan Meaningfull dan Joyfull Learning Berbasis Mathtrail untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Numerasi Siswa Menggunakan Model ADDIE. JPKMI (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Indonesia), 4(1). https://doi.org/10.36596/jpkmi.v3i4.609
Arnellis, A., Syarifuddin, H., & Ismail, R. N. (2023). Optimizing students’ mathematical critical and creative thinking skills through the flip-a-team model with e-learning. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v14i1.16904
Bicer, A., Aleksani, H., Butler, C., Jackson, T., Smith, T. D., & Bostick, M. (2024). Mathematical creativity in upper elementary school mathematics curricula. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101462
Cárcamo, A., Fuentealba, C., & Garzón, D. (2019). Local instruction theories at the university level: An example in a Linear Algebra course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108648
Doc, N. Van, Giam, N. M., Nam, N. T. H., Giang, N. T. H., & Thanh, N. T. (2024). Application of theories on thinking to build the theory of mathematical thinking in teaching high school mathematics. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.56916/jmrd.v1i1.624
Doorman, M. (2019). Design and research for developing local instruction theories. Avances de Investigacion En Educacion Matematica, 15, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem.v0i15.266
Duijzer, C., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Veldhuis, M., & Doorman, M. (2019). Supporting primary school students’ reasoning about motion graphs through physical experiences. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(6), 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01072-6
Gasteiger, H., & Benz, C. (2018). Enhancing and analyzing kindergarten teachers’ professional knowledge for early mathematics education. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51(December 2016), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.01.002
Groth, R. E., Jones, M., & Knaub, M. (2018). A framework for characterizing students’ cognitive processes related to informal best fit lines. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(4), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1509418
Komatsu, K., & Jones, K. (2022). Generating mathematical knowledge in the classroom through proof, refutation, and abductive reasoning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(3), 567–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10086-5
Leikin, R., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2013). Creativity and mathematics education: The state of the art. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(2), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0459-1
Lithner, J. (2017). Principles for designing mathematical tasks that enhance imitative and creative reasoning. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49(6), 937–949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0867-3
Manaud, J. P., & Aggabao, A. H. G. (2024). Self-directed learning approach in mathematics. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2024.45.1.06
Mejía-Ramos, J. P., & Weber, K. (2020). Using task-based interviews to generate hypotheses about mathematical practice: mathematics education research on mathematicians’ use of examples in proof-related activities. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52(6), 1099–1112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01170-w
Montenegro, P., Costa, C., & Lopes, B. (2018). Transformations in the Visual Representation of a Figural Pattern. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 20(2), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2018.1441599
Muzaini, M., Rahayuningsih, S., Ikram, M., & Nasiruddin, F. A. Z. (2023). Mathematical Creativity: Student Geometrical Figure Apprehension in Geometry Problem-Solving Using New Auxiliary Elements. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 9(1), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.9.1.139
Natsheh, I., & Karsenty, R. (2014). Exploring the potential role of visual reasoning tasks among inexperienced solvers. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(1), 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0551-1
Norqvist, M., Jonsson, B., Lithner, J., Qwillbard, T., & Holm, L. (2019). Investigating algorithmic and creative reasoning strategies by eye tracking. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 55(April 2018), 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.03.008
PISA. (2023). PISA 2022 Results Factsheets Indonesia. The Language of Science Education, 1.
Putrawangsa, S., & Hasanah, U. (2022). Analisis Capaian Siswa Indonesia Pada PISA dan Urgensi Kurikulum Berorientasi Literasi dan Numerasi Bagaimana trend capaian tersebut ? dan sejauh mana perubahan kurikulum selama ini berdampak pada. Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 1–12.
Rahmawati, A., Wahyuningsih, S. H., & Garad, A. (2023). The effect of financial literacy, training and locus of control on creative economic business performance. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100721
Razzouk, R., & Shute, V. (2012). What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654312457429
Simon, M. A., Placa, N., Kara, M., & Avitzur, A. (2018). Empirically-based hypothetical learning trajectories for fraction concepts: Products of the Learning Through Activity research program. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 52(October 2017), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.03.003
Tanudjaya, C. P., & Doorman, M. (2020). Examining higher order thinking in Indonesian lower secondary mathematics classrooms. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.11000.277-300
Voskoglou, M. (2008). Problem solving in mathematics education: Recent trends and development. In Scienze Matematiche (Vol. 1, Issue 18). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40730-2
Wilkie, K. J. (2021). Seeing quadratics in a new light: secondary mathematics pre-service teachers’ creation of figural growing patterns. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(1), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09997-6
Zahra, A. F. A., & Lessa Roesdiana. (2023). Jurnal Didactical Mathematics Analisis Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Jurnal Didactical Mathematics, 5(2).

Downloads

Published

2024-11-30

How to Cite

ikram, M. (2024). BAGAIMANA PEMIKIRAN KREATIF SISWA DALAM MEMECAHKAN SOAL ASESMEN NASIONAL?: RISET STUDI PADA WILAYAH TENGAH INDONESIA. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v9i2.4926

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): Pedagogy : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika

Section

Articles

License

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.