Analisis Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Pada Soal HOTS Berdasarkan Newman’s Error Analysis Ditinjau Dari Teori Polya
Keywords:
pemahaman matematis, HOTS, Newman's Error Analysis, Teori Polya
Abstract
Tujuan penelitian yakni mengetahui sejauh mana siswa mampu menjawab soal-soal HOTS berbasis NEA ditinjau dari teori Polya dengan menggunakan keahlian matematikanya. Siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 10 Kota Serang menjadi subjek penelitian. Wawancara dan ujian tertulis digunakan dalam pengumpulan data. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Alat tes dan wawancara digunakan dalam proyek studi untuk mengumpulkan informasi. Analisis Kesalahan Newman digunakan untuk menilai hasil tes setelah teori Polya digunakan untuk meninjau hasil tes siswa. Berdasarkan nilai ujian, siswa dibagi menjadi tiga kelompok berprestasi tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Untuk setiap kategori kemampuan, akan dipilih satu orang peserta sebagai subjek penelitian berdasarkan hasil tes. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa dengan keterampilan pemahaman yang tinggi dapat menyelesaikan pertanyaan hampir seluruhnya tanpa membuat kesalahan apa pun. Untuk siswa dengan kemampuan sedang, belum cukup mampu untuk menjawab soal karena beberapa kali keliru dalam menentukan rumus yang tepat. Siswa dengan kemampuan rendah belum dapat menjawab soal dikarenakan tidak memiliki pemahaman yang cukup.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Alkhatib, O. J. (2019). A Framework for Implementing Higher-Order Thinking Skills (Problem-Solving, Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Decision-Making) in Engineering & Humanities. Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences, ASET 2019, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714232
Bakar, M. T., Lanani, K., Harisman, Y., & Amam, A. (2020). Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Kelas VII SMP Pada Materi Himpunan Melalui Model Discovery Learning. Teorema: Teori Dan Riset Matematika, 5(2), 271–279. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/teorema/article/view/3819
Brown, J., & Skow, K. (2016). Mathematics: Identifying and Addressing Student Errors. The IRIS Center.
Chusnul, C., Mardiyana, M., & Retno, D. S. (2017). Errors analysis of problem solving using the Newman stage after applying cooperative learning of TTW type. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1913. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5016662
Doko, M. G. D., Sumadji, S., & Farida, N. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Berdasarkan Tahapan Polya Materi Segiempat. Rainstek: Jurnal Terapan Sains & Teknologi, 2(3), 228–235.
Hadi, S., Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., Apino, E., & Wulandari, N. F. (2018). The Difficulties of High School Students in Solving Higher-Order Thinking Skills Problems. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(4), 520–532.
Haghverdi, M., Shahvarani Semnani, A., & Seifi, M. (2012). The Relationship between Different Kinds of Students’ Errors and the Knowledge Required to Solve Mathematics Word Problems.
Hartiningrum, E. S. N., Anggraini, Y., & Anzora. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Prosiding Conference on Research and Community Services, 3(1), 338–345.
Jha, S. K. (2012). Mathematics Performance of Primary School Students in Assam (India): An Analysis Using Newman Procedure. International Journal of Computer Applications in Engineering Sciences, 2(1), 17–21.
Joni, S., Halawa, S., Regina, M., Devita, R., & Oktaviani, H. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Menyelesaikan Soal Pemahaman Konsep pada Materi Relasi dan Fungsi. Jurnal PRIMATIKA, 10(1), 11–18.
Jusniani, N., & Suryakancanai, U. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Pada Mata Kuliah Kapita Selekta Matematika SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Realistik (JI-MR, 3(2), 71–80.
Newman, A. (1983). Newman language of mathematics kit: Strategies for diagnosis and remediation. Pearson Education Australia.
Nurikawai, D., Sagita, L., & Setiyani, S. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Bentuk Aljabar Dengan Prosedur Newman. Journal of Honai Math, 4(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v4i1.157
Purba, D., Zulfadli, Z., & Lubis, R. (2021). Pemikiran George Polya Tentang Pemecahan Masalah. Mathematic Education Journal)MathEdu, 4(1), 25–31. http://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/
Puspa, R. D., As’ari, A. R., & Sukoriyanto. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Ditinjau Dari Tahapan Pemecahaman Masalah Polya. Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(2). http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jkpm
Rafi, I., & Retnawati, H. (2018). What are the common errors made by students in solving logarithm problems?. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012157
Rohim, D. C. (2019). Strategi Penyusunan Soal Berbasis HOTs pada Pembelajaran Matematika SD. BRILIANT: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 4(4), 436–446. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant
Santoso, D. A., Farid, A., & Ulum, B. (2017). Error Analysis of Students Working about Word Problem of Linear Program with NEA Procedure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 855(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/855/1/012043
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Singh, P., Rahman, A. A., & Hoon, T. S. (2010). The Newman procedure for analyzing Primary Four pupils errors on written mathematical tasks: A Malaysian perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.036
Son, A. L., & Fatimah, S. (2019). An analysis to student error of algebraic problem solving based on polya and newman theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012069
Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: What do they say?. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020
Tuohimaa, P. M.V, Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701708228
White, A. L. (2010). Numeracy, literacy and Newman’s error analysis. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(2), 129–148.
Zahra, S. J. A. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Pemahaman Konsep Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita SPLDV Dengan Tahapan Newman. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 2, 87–94.
Bakar, M. T., Lanani, K., Harisman, Y., & Amam, A. (2020). Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Kelas VII SMP Pada Materi Himpunan Melalui Model Discovery Learning. Teorema: Teori Dan Riset Matematika, 5(2), 271–279. https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/teorema/article/view/3819
Brown, J., & Skow, K. (2016). Mathematics: Identifying and Addressing Student Errors. The IRIS Center.
Chusnul, C., Mardiyana, M., & Retno, D. S. (2017). Errors analysis of problem solving using the Newman stage after applying cooperative learning of TTW type. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1913. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5016662
Doko, M. G. D., Sumadji, S., & Farida, N. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Berdasarkan Tahapan Polya Materi Segiempat. Rainstek: Jurnal Terapan Sains & Teknologi, 2(3), 228–235.
Hadi, S., Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., Apino, E., & Wulandari, N. F. (2018). The Difficulties of High School Students in Solving Higher-Order Thinking Skills Problems. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(4), 520–532.
Haghverdi, M., Shahvarani Semnani, A., & Seifi, M. (2012). The Relationship between Different Kinds of Students’ Errors and the Knowledge Required to Solve Mathematics Word Problems.
Hartiningrum, E. S. N., Anggraini, Y., & Anzora. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Prosiding Conference on Research and Community Services, 3(1), 338–345.
Jha, S. K. (2012). Mathematics Performance of Primary School Students in Assam (India): An Analysis Using Newman Procedure. International Journal of Computer Applications in Engineering Sciences, 2(1), 17–21.
Joni, S., Halawa, S., Regina, M., Devita, R., & Oktaviani, H. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Menyelesaikan Soal Pemahaman Konsep pada Materi Relasi dan Fungsi. Jurnal PRIMATIKA, 10(1), 11–18.
Jusniani, N., & Suryakancanai, U. (2022). Analisis Kesalahan Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Pada Mata Kuliah Kapita Selekta Matematika SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Realistik (JI-MR, 3(2), 71–80.
Newman, A. (1983). Newman language of mathematics kit: Strategies for diagnosis and remediation. Pearson Education Australia.
Nurikawai, D., Sagita, L., & Setiyani, S. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Bentuk Aljabar Dengan Prosedur Newman. Journal of Honai Math, 4(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.30862/jhm.v4i1.157
Purba, D., Zulfadli, Z., & Lubis, R. (2021). Pemikiran George Polya Tentang Pemecahan Masalah. Mathematic Education Journal)MathEdu, 4(1), 25–31. http://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/
Puspa, R. D., As’ari, A. R., & Sukoriyanto. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Ditinjau Dari Tahapan Pemecahaman Masalah Polya. Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(2). http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jkpm
Rafi, I., & Retnawati, H. (2018). What are the common errors made by students in solving logarithm problems?. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012157
Rohim, D. C. (2019). Strategi Penyusunan Soal Berbasis HOTs pada Pembelajaran Matematika SD. BRILIANT: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 4(4), 436–446. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant
Santoso, D. A., Farid, A., & Ulum, B. (2017). Error Analysis of Students Working about Word Problem of Linear Program with NEA Procedure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 855(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/855/1/012043
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Singh, P., Rahman, A. A., & Hoon, T. S. (2010). The Newman procedure for analyzing Primary Four pupils errors on written mathematical tasks: A Malaysian perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.036
Son, A. L., & Fatimah, S. (2019). An analysis to student error of algebraic problem solving based on polya and newman theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012069
Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: What do they say?. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020
Tuohimaa, P. M.V, Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. Educational Psychology, 28(4), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410701708228
White, A. L. (2010). Numeracy, literacy and Newman’s error analysis. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 33(2), 129–148.
Zahra, S. J. A. (2019). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Pemahaman Konsep Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita SPLDV Dengan Tahapan Newman. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 2, 87–94.
Published
22-05-2024
How to Cite
Winata, Z. N., & Anriani, N. (2024). Analisis Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Pada Soal HOTS Berdasarkan Newman’s Error Analysis Ditinjau Dari Teori Polya. Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v9i1.3737
Section
Articles
Copyright (c) 2024 Zulfa Nurrahma Winata, Nurul Anriani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
_.png)
