Appraisal System and Affective Stance in Mel Robbins’ Podcast Interview on Emotional Intelligence
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/4xkyh924
Appraisal System, Affective Stance, Podcast Discourse
Abstract
This study examines the realization of the Appraisal System and the construction of affective stance in an expert-layperson podcast interaction, focusing on an episode of The Mel Robbins Podcast featuring a Yale emotional intelligence expert. Adopting a descriptive qualitative design grounded in Systemic Functional Linguistics and supported by descriptive quantification of the coded evaluative categories, the analysis integrates the Appraisal framework with the Stance Triangle model to examine how evaluative meaning and affective positioning are enacted across 292 coded evaluative clauses drawn from a 64-minute, approximately 10,932-word transcript. Findings indicate that Judgement (39.4%) was the most frequent Attitude category, surpassing Affect (32.5%) and Appreciation (28.1%), a pattern attributed to the episode's narrative structure built around personal disclosure requiring evaluation of human conduct. Within Affect, Insecurity dominated; within Judgement, Capacity prevailed over Propriety; and within Appreciation, positive Valuation was directed overwhelmingly at emotion-regulation techniques rather than people, suggesting Appreciation functions as an implicit marker of knowledge acceptance in pedagogical talk. Stance analysis identified two recurring patterns: alignment through lexical echo and disalignment followed by collaborative repair, the latter occurring more frequently and demonstrating that the stance-taking process operates iteratively as a mechanism for correcting misjudgement in real time. These results indicate that Judgement functions as an interpretive scaffold through which Affect becomes meaningful to lay audiences in expert-mediated emotion talk. The study contributes provisional theoretical refinements to the integrated appraisal-stance approach and offers practical implications for popular psychology media, emotional education, and interview-based science communication design.
Downloads
References
Ansó-Millán, A. (2025). Analysing the discourse of knowledge transfer practices: A study of proximity in psychology-related podcasts. Complutense Journal of English Studies, 33, e98191. https://doi.org/10.5209/cjes.98191
Zafar, A., & Riaz, A. (2025). Uncovering The Rhetorical Secrets: A Corpus Based Analysis of Engagement Strategies in Tim Ferriss’ Talk Show & Podcasts. Social Science Review Archives, 3(3), 372–379. https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i3.872
Bednarek, M. (2008). Emotion Talk Across Corpora. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230285712
Bednarek, M. (2009). Language patterns and Attitude. Functions of Language, 16(2), 165–192. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.16.2.01bed
Benítez-Castro, M.-Á., & Hidalgo-Tenorio, E. (2019). Chapter 12. Rethinking Martin & White’s affect taxonomy: A psychologically-inspired approach to the linguistic expression of emotion. In J. L. Mackenzie & L. Alba-Juez (Eds.), Pragmatics & Beyond New Series (Vol. 302, pp. 301–332). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.302.12ben
Bingham, A. J. (2023). From Data Management to Actionable Findings: A Five-Phase Process of Qualitative Data Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 16094069231183620. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620
Cavasso, L., & Taboada, M. (2021). A corpus analysis of online news comments using the Appraisal framework. Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies, 4(0), 1. https://doi.org/10.18573/jcads.61
Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Pragmatics & Beyond New Series (Vol. 164, pp. 139–182). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.164.07du
Du Bois, J. W., & Kärkkäinen, E. (2012). Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2012-0021
Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum.
Fuoli, M. (2018). A stepwise method for annotating appraisal. Functions of Language, 25(2), 229–258. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.15016.fuo
Glenn, P. (2022). ”So You’re Telling Me . . . ”: Paraphrasing (Formulating), Affective Stance, And Active Listening. International Journal of Listening, 38(1), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2022.2136674
Habermas, J. (2022). Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341
Hadidi, Y., & Mohammadbagheri-Parvin, L. (2015). Systemic Functional Linguistics as Interpersonal Semantics: Appraisal and Attitude in the Stylistic Analysis of an English Novel. International Journal of Linguistics, 7(1), 129. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v7i1.7199
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2013). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269
Handoko, E. P. S., Citraresmana, E., & Darmayanti, N. (2026). Transitivity Processes in King Charles III’s Speech on State Banquet with the United States: A Systemic Functional Linguistics Study. 12(3), Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Sastra, 1860 [final page number to be verified by author]. https://doi.org/10.30605/aqgeks30
Hassani, H., Komendantova, N., Rovenskaya, E., & Yeganegi, M. R. (2024). Unveiling the waves of mis- and disinformation from social media. International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing, 15(03), 2450033. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793962324500338
Hidalgo-Downing, L., & Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2024). Developing an annotation protocol for evaluative stance and metaphor in discourse: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Text & Talk, 44(2), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2021-0096
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Kilpert, D. (2004). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3(2), 183–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2003.10.004
Kusuma, W. S., & Darma Laksana, I. K. (2020). Sistem Transitivitas Dalam Teks Pidato Pelantikan Presiden Republik Indonesia Joko Widodo. Linguistika: Buletin Ilmiah Program Magister Linguistik Universitas Udayana, 27(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.24843/ling.2020.v27.i01.p08
Liu, L., & Jiang, F. (Kevin). (2024). Podcasting science: Rhetorical moves and interactional metadiscourse in the Nature Podcast. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 71, 101419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101419
Liu, Q. Y., Ang, L. H., Waheed, M., & Mohd Kasim, Z. (2022). Appraisal Theory in Translation Studies—A Systematic Literature Review. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 30(4), 1589–1605. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.30.4.07
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause (2nd ed.). Continuum.
Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. R. (2005). The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910
Milani, T. M., & Richardson, J. E. (2021). Discourse and affect. Social Semiotics, 31(5), 671–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1810553
Pelttari, S. (2022). Emotional self-disclosure and stance-taking within affective narratives on YouTube: A qualitative case study of four Spanish YouTubers. International Journal of Language and Culture, 9(2), 292–321. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.22050.pel
Pezalla, A. E., Pettigrew, J., & Miller-Day, M. (2012). Researching the researcher-as-instrument: An exercise in interviewer self-reflexivity. Qualitative Research, 12(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111422107
Phan, L. T. (2025). Tracing the Development of Research on Appraisal Theory within Systemic Functional Linguistics (2003-2025): A Bibliometric Analysis. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 52, 87–109. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2025.52.05
Robbins, M. (Host). (2026). Permission to feel: A conversation with Dr. Mark Brackett [Video podcast episode]. In The Mel Robbins Podcast. YouTube.
Schrauf, R. W., De Victoria, P. L., & Diaz, B. (2020). Linguistic stance: An integrative paradigm for mixed methods social science. Language in Society, 49(2), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404519000757
Sevignani, S. (2022). Digital Transformations and the Ideological Formation of the Public Sphere: Hegemonic, Populist, or Popular Communication? Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221103516
Shi, X., Wu, J., & Wei, L. (2022). Stance Taking in News Interviews: An Application of Stance Triangle and Conversation Analysis. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 12(02), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2022.122015
Silaban, J. P. K., Azzahra, S., & Nurlela. (2025). The Language of Engagement: Speech Functions and Mood in the Berkeley Exec Ed Podcast. Lexeme : Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v7i2.47300
Sujatna, E. T. S., & Kuswoyo, H. (2023). An appraisal perspective on students’ use of attitudinal resources in university EFL academic oral presentations. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 10(1), 2195728. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2023.2195728
Zappettini, F., Ponton, D. M., & Larina, T. V. (2021). Emotionalisation of contemporary media discourse: A research agenda. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 25(3), 586–610. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2021-25-3-586-610
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kadek Dwiyanti, I Made Perdana Skolastika, I Wayan Heka Arcana Putra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
