Washback Effects of Summative English Test on Teaching Practices in EFL Classrooms: Teachers’ Perspectives
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/2bpg4j10
EFL classroom, language assessment, summative English test, teaching practice, washback effect
Abstract
This study explores the perception of two secondary school EFL teachers towards the washback effect of summative English tests on their teaching practices. Employing a qualitative descriptive design with purposive sampling, data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using the Miles, Huberman, and Saldana (2014) interactive model, comprising data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing and verification. Given the exploratory nature of this study and its limited number of participants, the findings are not intended for generalization but to offer contextual insights into how teachers interpret and respond to assessment demands in their daily classroom practices. The findings reveal that the summative English test shaped teachers’ instructional decisions, material selection, classroom activities, and time allocation before the examination. Both positive and negative washback were identified. Positive washback appeared in the form of increased student motivation, learning focus, familiarity with the test formats, material reinforcement, and formative feedback. Negative washback manifested as skills narrowing, particularly the marginalization of speaking and listening teaching to the test, score orientation, and student anxiety. Importantly, the findings suggest that washback is not mechanically produced by the test itself but is mediated by teachers’ pedagogical responses, including their choices of material, assessment media, and strategies for managing student pressure. These findings contribute to washback scholarship by foregrounding the teacher’s mediating role in the context of regular classroom summative tests, a dimension that remains underexplored compared to high-stakes national or international examinations.
Downloads
References
Ahmmed, R., & Rahman, K. A. (2019). Review of Empirical Studies of Washback in language testing. Bangladesh Maritime Journal, 3(1), 150–162.
Alderson J. Charles, W. D. (1992). Does Washback Exist? Applied Linguistics, 137.
Alqahtani, F. (2021). The Impact of Language Testing Washback in Promoting Teaching and Learning Processes: A Theoretical Review. English Language Teaching, 14(7), 21. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n7p21
Barnes, M. (2016). The washback effects of the TOEFL iBT in Vietnam. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(7), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n7.10
Barnes, M. (2017). Journal of English for Academic Purposes Washback : Exploring what constitutes “ good ” teaching practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.003
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices (Longman (ed.).
Cheng, L. (2005). Changing language teaching throygh languagr testing: A washback study. Cambridge University Press.
Cresswell, John W., Creswell, D. J. (2012). T. In European University Institute (Fifth Edit, Number 2). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dawadi, S. (2021). Factors Influencing Washback of a High-stakes English as a Foreign Language Test. TeSL-EJ, 25(3), 1–16. https://tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume25/ej99a1/
Dejonckheere, M., & Vaughn, L. M. (2019). Semistructured interviewing in primary care research : a balance of relationship and rigour. Family Medicine and Community Health, 7(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000057
Green, A. (2020). Exploring Language Assessment and Testing: Language in Action. (2nd Edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003105794
Kilickaya, F. (2016). Washback effects of a high-stakes exam on lower secondary school English teachers ’ practices in the classroom. 40(1).
Kirkpatrick, R., & Zang, Y. (2011). The Negative Influences of Exam-Oriented Education on Chinese High School Students: Backwash from Classroom to Child. Language Testing in Asia, 1(3), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1186/2229-0443-1-3-36
Lawrence A. Palinkas, Sarah M. Horwitz, Carla A. Green, Jennifer P. Wisdom, Naihua Duan, K. H. (2016). Purposful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 553–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.
Liang, Y., Siraj, S., & Lo, Y. Y. (n.d.). Exploring washback processes in language teaching through teachers’ beliefs in the Chinese National Matriculation English Test (NMET). 2025, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05345-2.
Miles, Matthew B., Huberman A. Michael., S. J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis (Third Edit). SAGE Publications, Inc.Third Edit). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Mirza, C., Teymoori, H., & Mirza, H. (2023). Washback Effects of High-Stakes Examinations on Teachers’ Perceptions of their Instructional Practices. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(9), 571–591. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.9.31
Muñoz, A. P., & Álvarez, M. E. (2010). Washback of an oral assessment system in the EFL classroom. Language Testing, 27(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209347148
Phuong, H. Y., Bao, N., Tran, C., Thuy, T., Nguyen, L., Lam, T. D., & Bui, N. Q. (2025). From tests to tasks : how Vietnamese EFL teachers navigate washback through formative assessment practices. Language Testing in Asia, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-025-00392-7.
Rahman, K. A., Mahbub, P., Seraj, I., Hasan, K., & Namaziandost, E. (2021). Washback of assessment on English teaching-learning practice at secondary schools. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00129-2
Sadighi, S., Yamini, M., Bagheri, M. S., & Yarmohammadi, L. (2018). Investigating preuniversity EFL teachers’ perceived wash-back effects of university entrance exams and teaching materials on students’ learning objectives and teachers’ class performance. Cogent Social Sciences, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2018.1546448
Safa, M. A., & Jafari, F. (2016). The washback effects of high school third grade exam on EFL teachers’ methodolgy, evaluation and attitude. Applied Research on English Language, 5(1), 77–98.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Focus on Research Methods Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? 334–340. Research in Nursing and Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240x(200008)23:4<334::aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g
Soomro, A. H., Zulfiqar, S., & Shah, A. (2016). Effects of Washback on High School Teachers of English International Journal of English and Education, 5(2), 201-210. https://ijee.org/ijee/article/view/627
Spratt, M. (2005). Washback and the classroom: The implications for teaching and learning of studies of washback from exams. Language Teaching Research, 9(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr152oa.
Sukyadi, D., & Mardiani, R. (2011). The Washback Effect of the English National Examination (ENE) on English Teachers’ Classroom Teaching and Students’ Learning. K@Ta, 13(1), 96–111. https://doi.org/10.9744/kata.13.1.96-111
Suryanto, J. (2025). Washback effect: How it works on EFL students. Celtic : A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 12(1), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v12i1.39710.
Thi, T., Chi, L., Thi, P., & Nhung, H. (2024). EFL Teaching Practices Under the Washback of High-Stakes Tests: What Aspects Are Affected? Hue University Journal of Science: Social Sciences and Humanities, 133(6B), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.26459/hueunijssh.v133i6d.7407.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Putri Alfiana Amalia, Muhammad Farkhan, Nida Husna, Teguh Khaerudin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
