Guru IPA dan Calon Guru IPA Menghadapi Soal-Soal Berkarakter PISA

  • Eka Danti Agustiani PPPPTK IPA Bandung
Keywords: Guru IPA, Calon Guru IPA, PISA

Abstract

Indonesia adalah salah satu negara non anggota Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) yang mengikuti Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) untuk mendapatkan gambaran posisi relatif tingkat literasi peserta didik dalam kisaran usia 15 tahun di dunia internasional. Dalam kategori sains, peringkat Indonesia pada hasil PISA yang terakhir dirilis (tahun 2018) masih berada di lingkup 10 terbawah. Hal tersebut menguatkan dugaan masih adanya kesenjangan antara proses dan evaluasi pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (IPA) dengan kerangka asesmen literasi yang digunakan dalam PISA. Salah satu aspek yang harus menjadi bahan kajian terkait dugaan tersebut adalah pengenalan dan penguasaan para guru IPA terhadap soal-soal yang digunakan dalam PISA. Dalam makalah ini disajikan hasil yang diperoleh oleh mahasiswa calon guru IPA dan guru-guru IPA SMP dengan rata-rata pengalaman mengajar 13 tahun 11 bulan ketika menghadapi 20 soal pilihan ganda yang disadur dari atau mengadaptasi soal-soal sains PISA. Pembahasan dan rekomendasi terkait hasil tersebut juga diajukan dalam makalah ini.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Allchin, D. (2014). From science studies to scientific literacy: A view from the classroom, Science and Education, 23(9), 1911-1932.

Avvisati, F. (2018). How are school performance and school climate related to teachers’ experience?, PISA in Focus 88/September, OECD Publishing:Paris.

Baharuddin, Muhammad Rusli, A. Fitriani, and Jumarniati Jumarniati. "EFEKTIVITAS PENDEKATAN PROBLEM POSING SETTING KOOPERATIF TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN LITERASI MATEMATIS." Pedagogy: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 2.2 (2017).

Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., Swanger, L. P., Staus, N., Back, M., Barriault, C.,... Verheyden, P. (2016). Correlating science center use with adult science literacy: An international, cross-institutional study. Science Education, 100(5), 849–876.

Fitriani, F., Baharuddin, M. R., & Kayanti, J. (2019). Comparison of Cooperative Learning Model Think Pair Share and Think Pair Square Toward Students’ Mathematical Communication Ability. International Conference on Natural and Social Sciences (ICONSS) Proceeding Series, 1(1), 202-208.

Guzzetti, B.J., Bang, E. (2010). The Influence of Literacy-Based Science Instruction on Adolescents' Interest, Participation, and Achievement in Science, Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(1), 44-67.

Heller, J.I., Daehler, K.R., Wong, N., Shinohara, M. & Miratrix, L. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 333-362.

Iskandar, D. & Senam. (2015). Studi kemampuan guru Kimia lulusan UNY dalam mengembangkan soal UAS berbasis HOTS, Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(1), 65-72.

Kazempour, M. & Amirshokoohi, A. (2014). Transitioning to inquiry-based teaching: exploring science teachers’ professional development experiences, International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 9, 285-309.

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Materi Pelatihan Guru Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 SMP/MTs IPA.

Kini, T. & Podolsky, A. (2016). Does Teaching Experience Increase Teacher Effectiveness? A Review of the Research. Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute.

Meroni, E. C., Vera-Toscano, E., & Costa, P. (2015). Can low skills teachers make good students? Empirical evidence from PIAAC and PISA, Journal of Policy and Modelling, 37, 308-323.

Organisation for Economics Co-operation and Development. (2017). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic, Financial Literacy and Collaborative Problem Solving, ed.,Paris:OECD Publishing.

Organisation for Economics Co-operation and Development. (2016). Country Note Results from PISA: Indonesia, Paris: OECD Publishing.

Pisanu, F., Fraccaroli, F., & Gentile, M. (2014). Training Transfer in Teachers Training Program: A Longitudinal Case Study, K. Schneider (ed.), Transfer of Learning in Organizations, 99-120.

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A.M., Osman, K. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110 – 116.

Ryder, J., dan Banner, I. (2013). School Teachers’ Experiences of Science Curriculum Reform, International Journal of Science Education, 35(3), 490-514.

Sari, Y., Cahyaningtyas, A.P., Maharani, M.M., Yustiana, S., & Kusumadewi, R.F. (2019). Meningkatkan kemampuan menyusun soal IPA berorientasi HOTS bagi guru Sekolah Dasar Gugus Pandanaran Dabin IV UPTD Semarang Tengah, Indonesian Journal of Community Services, 1(2), 175-183,

Scully, D. (2017). Constructing Multiple-Choice Items to Measure Higher-Order Thinking, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 22(4).

Sudibyo, E., Qosyim, N., & Sabtiawan, W.B. (2020). Pendampingan pengembangan instrumen penilaian berstandar nasional bagi guru IPA SMP kabupaten Kediri, Jurnal Abdi, 5(2), 127-133.

Turiman, P., Omar, J., Daud, A.M., & Osman, K. (2012) Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, 110 – 116.

Wilson, S. M. (2013, 19 April). Professional Development for Science Teachers, Science, 340, 310-313.

Woods-McConney, A., Oliver, M.C., McConney, Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2013). Science engagement and literacy: A retrospective analysis for students in Canada and Australia, International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1588-1608.

Published
24-02-2020
How to Cite
Agustiani, E. D. (2020). Guru IPA dan Calon Guru IPA Menghadapi Soal-Soal Berkarakter PISA. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.3.1.2020.237
Section
Regular Articles