PROFIL KESULITAN SISWA PADA TAHAP EMPLOY DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PISA
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/jfms7n14
Employ, Kesulitan Siswa, Literasi Matematika, PISA
Abstract
Kemampuan literasi matematika siswa Indonesia berdasarkan hasil Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) masih tergolong rendah, terutama pada proses employ, yaitu kemampuan menerapkan konsep, prosedur, dan penalaran matematika untuk menyelesaikan masalah kontekstual. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis kesulitan siswa SMP pada tahap employ dalam menyelesaikan soal berbasis PISA pada konten Quantity, Space and Shape, dan Uncertainty and Data. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan subjek 32 siswa kelas VIII-C SMP Negeri 1 Muaro Jambi, melalui tes tertulis tiga soal adaptasi PISA dan wawancara dengan guru matematika. Data dianalisis menggunakan model Miles & Huberman (1994) yang meliputi reduksi data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa umumnya telah mampu melewati tahap formulate dengan baik, tetapi pada tahap employ mengalami tiga bentuk kesulitan yang konsisten pada ketiga konten, yaitu tidak menuntaskan prosedur penyelesaian, kesalahan perhitungan, serta kurang tepatnya penerapan konsep atau pemanfaatan data. Temuan ini mengindikasikan adanya kesenjangan antara pemahaman konseptual dan kelancaran prosedural siswa. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan pembelajaran matematika yang lebih menekankan latihan soal kontekstual secara bertahap untuk mengembangkan kelancaran prosedural dan penalaran matematis siswa.
Downloads
References
Alagumalai, S., & Buchdahl, N. (2021). PISA 2012: Examining the influence of prior knowledge, time-on-task, school-level effects on achievements in mathematical literacy processes – Interpret, employ and formulate. Australian Journal of Education, 65(2), 173–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441211031674;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:AEDA;ISSUE:ISSUE:DOI
Angriani, A. D., Nakesya A.S, K., Amrillah, N. A., Alpiyanti, Imansyah, M. R. T., & Maulana, M. I. (2024). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Literasi Matematika PISA berdasarkan Self-efficacy.Prosiding Diskusi Panel Nasional Pendidikan Matematika. 517–526.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Assessing student teachers’ procedural fluency and strategic competence in operating and mathematizing with natural and rational numbers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.scribd.com/document/873342342/7-Best-Scribd-Downloaders-Online-Free-2025
Díaz-Simón, N., & Ansari, D. (2025). Learning arithmetic strategies: The roles of individual and contextual factors. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 68, 187–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/BS.ACDB.2025.03.004
Gusriani, N., Pasaribu, F. T., & Gustiningsi, T. (2025). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA Konten Space and Shape. Pedagogy, 10(4).
Gustiningsi, T., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Hapizah. (2023). Developing a PISA-Like Mathematical Problem: Using Traditional Food Context. IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application), 6(3), 324–337. https://doi.org/10.31764/IJECA.V6I3.20200
Gustiningsi, T., & Somakim, S. (2021). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Tipe PISA Level 5 dengan Konteks Pribadi. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 915. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i2.3535
Gustiningsi, T., Tiona Pasaribu, F., & Ramalisa, Y. (2025). Jambi Batik Pattern: Developing PISA-Like Mathematics Problems. MATHEMATICS TEACHING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 311(6).
Kholid, M. N., Rofi’ah, F., Ishartono, N., Waluyo, M., Maharani, S., Swastika, A., Faiziyah, N., & Sari, C. K. (2022). What Are Students’ Difficulties in Implementing Mathematical Literacy Skills for Solving PISA-Like Problem? Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(2), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.33423/JHETP.V22I2.5057
Lindström-Sandahl, H., Samuelsson, J., Danielsson, H., Samuelsson, S., & Elwér, Å. (2024). A randomized controlled study of a second grade numeracy intervention with Swedish students at‐risk of mathematics difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 1052–1071. https://bpspsychub.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bjep.12705
Lusinda, U., Tiona Pasaribu, F., Gustiningsi, T., Sapta Nusantara, D., & Kunci, K. (2025). Pengembangan Soal Matematika Tipe PISA Konten Uncertaunty and Data Menggunakan Konteks Museum Siginjai Jambi. Numeracy, 12(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.46244/NUMERACY.V12I1.3128
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. In An expanded sourcebook (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528790010406
Mohamed Elsayed, S. A. (2022). The Effectiveness of Learning Mathematics according to the STEM Approach in Developing the Mathematical Proficiency of Second Graders of the Intermediate School. Education Research International, 2022(1), 5206476. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5206476
Nurhayati, H., Hasanah, A., Fitriyah, Y., & Sedya Febrianti, T. (2024). The Process of Mathematical Literacy in Middle School Students: Analyzing the Role of Mathematical Dispositions. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 25(2), 893–913. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i2.pp893-913
Nurhidayati, Nusantara, D. S., & Gustiningsi, T. (2025). Mathematical Literacy Review of PISA-Type Mathematics Tasks: A Focus on the Quantity Content. Numerical: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v9.i2.6969
Nusantara, D. S., Zulkardi, & Putri, R. I. I. (2021). Designing Pisa-like mathematics problem using a COVID-19 transmission map context. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2438. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0071596
OECD. (2010). ISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do (Volume I): Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (PISA, Vol. 1). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264091450-en
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Released Mathematics Items.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en
OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. In PISA (PISA). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53F23881-EN
Schulz, A., & Ch, A. S. (2023). Assessing student teachers’ procedural fluency and strategic competence in operating and mathematizing with natural and rational numbers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education 2023 27:6, 27(6), 981–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10857-023-09590-7
Stacey, K. (2011). The PISA View of Mathematical Literacy in Indonesia (Vol. 2, Number 2). www.oecd.org/pisa
Sulistiani, L., & Zulkardi. (2019). Developing PISA-Like Mathematics Problems Using Indonesian Food Context. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012078
Trapsilasiwi, D., Kurnia, N., Atmadji, P., Wiliandani, I., Putri, S., Safrida, L. N., Oktavianingtyas, E., Dwi, D., Jatmiko, H., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Jatmiko, H. (2025). Profil Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Kontekstual pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Tiga Variabel. Jurnal Axioma: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 10(2).
Wildani, J. (2020). The Analysis of Students’ Difficulties in Solving PISA Mathematics Problems. 246–252. https://doi.org/10.5220/0008520202460252
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arina Amelia, Tria Gustiningsi, Feri Tiona Pasaribu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
