PEMAHAMAN KONSEP BILANGAN PADA SISWA SMP DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/pyw5nx35
Adversity Quotient, Bilangan Rasional, Pemahaman Konsep
Abstract
Pemahaman konsep merupakan tujuan utama pembelajaran matematika, khususnya pada materi bilangan rasional di jenjang SMP, namun kondisi di lapangan menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman konsep bilangan yang dimiliki siswa masih lemah. Selain faktor kognitif, faktor non-kognitif seperti Adversity Quotient (AQ) juga memengaruhi kemampuan siswa dalam menghadapi kesulitan belajar matematika. Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan pemahaman konsep bilangan rasional pada siswa SMP ditinjau dari tipe Adversity Quotient, yaitu Climber, Camper, dan Quitter. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan subjek tiga siswa kelas VII SMP Negeri 15 Surabaya yang dipilih berdasarkan hasil Tes Kemampuan Matematika dan Adversity Response Profile, masing-masing mewakili satu tipe AQ dengan kemampuan matematika dan jenis kelamin yang setara. Data dikumpulkan melalui Tes Pemahaman Konsep dan wawancara semi-terstruktur, kemudian dianalisis melalui tahap kondensasi data, penyajian data, serta penarikan dan verifikasi simpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa siswa dengan tipe Climber mampu mencapai pemahaman konsep bilangan rasional secara konsisten pada empat indikator, meskipun masih terdapat kekurangan pada kelengkapan syarat dan ketepatan istilah saat menyatakan ulang konsep. Siswa dengan tipe Camper mampu mencapai pemahaman konsep, tetapi penjelasan verbalnya masih bersifat dasar dan cenderung bergantung pada satu bentuk representasi. Siswa dengan tipe Quitter belum sepenuhnya mencapai pemahaman konsep bilangan rasional karena masih bergantung pada hafalan prosedur serta kurang mampu menerapkan dan menyajikan konsep dalam berbagai representasi. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa tipe Adversity Quotient berkontribusi terhadap variasi kedalaman pemahaman konsep bilangan siswa SMP.
Downloads
References
School Students' Numeracy Literacy in Solving Minimum Competency Assessment Model (AKM) Questions on Number. Al Khawarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 8(2), 109–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22373/jppm.v8i2.24456
Firdaus, H., & Ismail. (2023). Proses Berpikir Analitis Siswa SMA dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Masalah ditinjau dari Kemampuan Matematika. MATHEdunesa, 12(3), 797–813. https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n3.p797-813 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v12n3.p797-813
Hidayat, R. (2018). Adversity Quotient dan Implikasinya dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Alfabeta.
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Human, P. (1997). Making Sense: Teaching and Learning with Understanding. Heinemann.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. National Academy Press.
Lestari, W. D. L., & Hanifah, H. (2025). Analisis Adversity Quotient Siswa SMP Pada Pembelajaran Matematika. Didactical Mathematics, 7(1), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v7i1.13438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v7i1.13438
Luh, N., Risma, P., Mahayukti, G. A., & Sudiarta, I. G. P. (2025). Profil Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM) Pada Konten Bilangan. Jurnal Ikatan Keluarga Undiksha, 23(1), 23–30.
Meidianti, A., Kholifah, N., & Sari, N. I. (2022). Kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis peserta didik dalam pembelajaran matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 134–144.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Muhayana, I., Setiawan, R., & Wulandari, D. (2021). Pengaruh Adversity Quotient terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Jurnal Cendekia, 5(1), 112.
Musser, G. L., Burger, W. F., & Peterson, B. E. (2013). Mathematics for Elementary Teachers: A Contemporary Approach (9th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
National Council of Teacher of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. NCTM.
Pratiwi, V. E., & Rahayu, W. (2025). Systematic Literature Review: Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient. Griya Journal of Mathematics Education and Application, 5, 1408–1421. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/griya.v5i3.729
Rahmayanti, W., & Leni, M. (2025). The Effect of Adversity Quotient and Self-Efficacy on The Ability of Understanding Mathematical Concepts of Vocational High School Students. TEMATIK: Jurnal Konten Pendidikan, 3(2), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.55210/jkpm DOI: https://doi.org/10.55210/jkpm
Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity Quotient: Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Supardi. (2013). Pengaruh Adversity Quotient terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Jurnal Formatif, 3, 61–71.
Tall, D. (2004). Building Theories: The Three Worlds of Mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(4), 29–32.
Verina, I., & Darhim, D. (2023). Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa SMP Kelas VIII pada Topik Persegi Panjang. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 12(2), 2063–2076. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i2.7581 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v12i2.7581
Wibowo, T., Darmono, P. B., & Azieta, H. N. (2022). An Analysis of the Ability to Understand Mathematical Concepts of Middle School Students in Completing Integer Operations. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.16.1.15324.29-44 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.16.1.15324.29-44
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Syabila Tasya Febia, Ismail
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
