ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN LITERASI MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA SD LENTERA HARAPAN PALOPO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/vefnfp81
Literasi Matematika; Gaya Belajar
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kemampuan literasi matematika pada siswa Sekolah Dasar (SD) Lentera Harapan Palopo dengan mempertimbangkan peran gaya belajar mereka. Penelitian dilakukan untuk memahami sejauh mana hubungan antara gaya belajar, representasi, dan pemahaman konsep matematika pada tingkat dasar. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif analitis dengan melibatkan siswa kelas tinggi sebagai sampel. Data dikumpulkan melalui tes kemampuan literasi matematika, wawancara, dan observasi terkait preferensi gaya belajar siswa. Analisis data dilakukan dengan mengidentifikasi pola-pola kemampuan literasi matematika dan hubungannya dengan gaya belajar yang dominan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat variasi kemampuan literasi matematika di antara siswa SD Lentera Harapan Palopo, dan gaya belajar memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap pola-pola tersebut. Siswa dengan gaya belajar visual cenderung unggul dalam menerapkan representasi grafis, sementara siswa dengan gaya belajar auditori menunjukkan kecenderungan dalam memahami konsep melalui pendekatan lisan. Selanjutnya, siswa dengan gaya belajar kinestetik lebih menyukai pembelajaran yang melibatkan aktivitas fisik dan simulasi. Hasil temuan ini memberikan kontribusi pada pemahaman mendalam mengenai bagaimana gaya belajar memengaruhi kemampuan literasi matematika pada tingkat SD. Implikasi penelitian ini dapat digunakan sebagai dasar untuk pengembangan strategi pembelajaran yang lebih efektif dan berorientasi pada gaya belajar individu, sehingga meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan matematika di sekolah dasar.
Downloads
References
Abidin, Y., Mulyati, T dan Yunansah, H. (2018). Pembelajaran Literasi: Strategi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika, Sains, Membaca, dan Menulis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Adeyemi, O. B. & Adaramola, M. O. (2014). Mathematics Literacy as a Foundation for Technological Development in Nigeria. Journal of Research and Method in Education, 4(5), 28-31.
Afkhami, R., Alamolhodaei, H., & Radmehr, F. (2012). Exploring The Relationship Between Iranian Student’s Mathematical Literacy and Mathematical Performance. Journal of American Sciences, 8(4), 213-222.
Arifin, Zainal. (2015). Penelitan Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2010). Prosedur penelitian: suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bishop, A. J. et.al. (2006). “Values in Mathematics and Science Education: Researchers‟ and Teachers‟ Views on the Similarities and Differences”. For the Learning of Mathematics, an International Journal of Mathematics Education. 26(1), 7-11.
Booker, G., Bond, D., Sparrow, L., & Swan, P. (2011). Teaching Primary Mathematics. Australia: Pearson
Budiyono. (2017). Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Surakarta: UNS Press
Campbell, C., & Sanders, L. (2007). Introduction to Science and Mathematics Education. Allen & Unwin.
Cope, B & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. London: Routledge.
Creswell, John. (2013). Educational research 4th edition. Pearson. England
De Lange, J. (2006). Mathematical Literacy for Living from OECD-PISA Perspective. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics, 25, 13- 35.
Fananta, M. R., Widjiasih, A. E., Setiawan, R., Hanifah, N., Miftahussururi, Nento, M. N., et al. (2017). Materi Pendukung Literasi Sains Gerakan Literasi Nasional. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Fianto, F., Prismayani, R., Wijaya, N. I., Miftahussururi, Hanifah, N., Nento, M. N., et al. (2017). Materi Pendukung Literasi Finansial Gerakan Literasi Nasional. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Garcia, M., & Rodriguez, A. (2020). A Longitudinal Study on the Relationship between Learning Styles and Mathematical Literacy Development in Primary Education. Journal of Educational Research, 28(3), 305–320.
Hadi, S. (2019). Model Literasi Matematika pada Peserta Didik Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 4(1), 43-50.
Hayat, B. dan Yusuf, S. (2010). Benchmark Internasional Mutu Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Jordan, N. C., Levine, S. C., & Huttenlocher, J. (2017). Development of mathematics skills in preschool children: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 53(2), 246-258.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Gerakan Literasi Nasional Materi Pendukung Literasi Numerasi. Jakarta: Tim Gerakan Literasi Nasional.
Kemendikbud. 2017. Panduan Penilaian oleh Pendidik dan Satuan Pendidikan untuk Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah
Khan, L. A. (2015). What is Mathematics – an Overview. International Journal of Mathematics and Computational Science, 1(3), 98-101.
Mahdiansyah dan Rahmawati. 2014. “Literasi Matematika Siswa Pendidikan Menengah: Analisis Menggunakan Desain Tes Internasional dengan Konteks Indonesia”. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 20(4): 452 - 469.
Maulida, Y. (2022). Mengimplementasikan Budaya Literasi Dalam Dunia Pendidikan Untuk Membangun Kualitas Anak Bangsa. https://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/2fqdz
Moleong, Lexy J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya,
Neuman, S.B.& Dickinson, D. K. (2011). Handbook of Early Literacy Research, Volume 1. New York: The Guilford Press.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Assassement and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Diakses dari http://www.oecd.org pada tanggal 24 September 2020, Jam 20.43
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Radtke, H. L. (2011). The Six Literacies Everyone Needs to Know," Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 521-525.
Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S. (2018). Conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: Exploring relations and effects on learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 121-135.
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative Interviewing: The Art Of Hearing Data. Sage Publications.
Setyawan, Ibnu Aji. (2018, Januari 5). Literasi Sekolah: Kupas Tuntas Jenis dan Pengertian Literasi. Diakses dari http://gurudigital.id/jenis-pengertian-literasi-adalah/
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Tindakan. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sukmadinata. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Umaru, Y. &Tukur, H. A. (2013). The Influence of Dependent and Independent Cognitive Styles on Achievement in Mathematics Among Senior Secondary School Students in Bida Educational Zone of Niger State, Nigeria. Journal of Research in Education and Society, 4(2), 60-67
UNESCO. (2004). The Plurality of Literacy and its Implications for Policies and Programmes. Paris: UNESCO.
Wahab, I., & Nuraeni. (2020). The analysis of students’ learning style. Scope of English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 3(1), 41–46.
Wang, H., & Li, J. (2022). Effect of Learning Style-Based Instruction on Mathematical Literacy Scores: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 50(2), 180-195.
World Bank. (2020). Learning Loss during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Diakses dari: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/publication/learning-loss-during-the-covid-19-pandemic
Yarrow, Noah; Masood, Eema; Afkar, Rythia. (2020). Estimates of COVID-19 Impacts on Learning and Earning in Indonesia: How to Turn the Tide. World Bank, Washington, DC. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/34378 License: CC BY 3.0 IGO.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Pedagogy : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
