ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN METAKOGNISI SISWA SMP DI KABUPATEN PANDEGLANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/pedagogy.v10i4.7404
kemampuan metakognisi, pembelajaran matematika
Abstract
Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh pentingnya kemampuan metakognitif dalam pembelajaran matematika yang menuntut siswa tidak hanya memahami konsep, tetapi juga menyadari proses berpikir yang mereka lakukan. Kemampuan metakognisi membantu siswa merencanakan strategi, memantau proses penyelesaian, dan mengevaluasi efektivitas langkah yang digunakan. Observasi awal di beberapa SMP di Kabupaten Pandeglang menunjukkan bahwa siswa masih kesulitan menjelaskan alasan di balik prosedur penyelesaian, yang mengindikasikan rendahnya kesadaran metakognitif. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis tingkat kemampuan metakognisi siswa berdasarkan tiga aspek utama, yaitu planning, monitoring, dan evaluating. Metode yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kuantitatif dengan melibatkan 120 siswa kelas VII dari enam sekolah negeri dan swasta. Selain itu, 87 guru MGMP Matematika mengisi angket persepsi sebagai data pendukung untuk memperkuat interpretasi hasil tes. Instrumen penelitian meliputi tes metakognitif berbentuk soal situasional dan angket skala Likert. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan metakognitif siswa berada pada kategori rendah dengan rata-rata skor 62,5; aspek planning berada pada kategori sedang (68,2), sedangkan monitoring (60,5) dan evaluating (58,7) berada pada kategori rendah. Konsistensi hasil tes dan persepsi guru menunjukkan perlunya strategi pembelajaran yang memberi ruang bagi refleksi diri dan penilaian proses berpikir siswa secara berkelanjutan.
Downloads
References
Astuti, N., & Sari, R. P. (2023). Analisis kemampuan komunikasi matematis ditinjau dari self-efficacy siswa. TIRTAMATH: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengajaran Matematika, 5(1), 1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v16i1.16266
Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 269–290.
Fauziah, L., Pujiastuti, H., & Anriani, N. (2023). Analisis kemampuan komunikasi matematis ditinjau dari self-efficacy siswa. TIRTAMATH: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengajaran Matematika, 5(1), 1–12.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Hayati, R., Pratiwi, U. M., Hasan, H., & Pujiastuti, H. (2024). Pengembangan modul ajar statistika berbasis problem based learning untuk memfasilitasi kemampuan literasi numerasi siswa. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 1763–1775. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v8i2.3344
Hermansyah, P., Pujiastuti, H., & Fathurrohman, M. (2024). Systematic literature review: Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis siswa dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran PBL. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(10), 12219–12224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v7i10.6108
Izzati, M., & Pujiastuti, H. (2020). Pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis masalah terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis matematika. Jurnal MathEduca, 4(2), 89–102.
Kurnia, D., Suryani, T., & Hasanah, L. (2023). Hubungan kemampuan metakognisi dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa. Jurnal Cendekia Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 112–124.
Kurnia, T., Pujiastuti, H., & Fathurrohman, M. (2023). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dengan pendekatan metakognitif: Systematic literature review. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(1), 616–622. DOI: https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i1.1398
Kurniawati, E. F., Umroh, Kusumo, B. J., & Pujiastuti, H. (2024). Modul matematika berbasis problem based learning berbantuan Geogebra untuk memfasilitasi kemampuan HOTS. J-PMat: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 1025–1036. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31932/j-pimat.v6i2.3590
Lai, E. R. (2011). Metacognition: A literature review. Pearson Research Report.
Nenden. (2019). Analisis kemampuan monitoring siswa pada pembelajaran matematika berbasis masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 6(3), 211–220.
Nurfadilah, S., & Kurnia, D. (2023). Aktivitas reflektif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan metakognisi siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Insight, 4(2), 55–66.
Pujiastuti, H., & Haryadi, R. (2023). Enhancing mathematical literacy ability through guided inquiry learning with augmented reality. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 10(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2023.101.43.50 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v10i1.4338
Rahmawati, L., & Widyaningsih, S. (2024). Pengaruh kemampuan metakognisi terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Jurnal Numeracy Education, 5(1), 77–89.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
Suratno, A., Lestari, D., & Pramudiyanti, E. (2024). Analisis metakognisi siswa dalam penyelesaian soal matematika kontekstual. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Integratif, 15(1), 1–13.
Supiandi, A., Sudarsono, U., & Mahyudi, A. (2023). Profil kemampuan metakognitif siswa SMP dalam pembelajaran matematika. International Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 3(2), 94–105.
Sutarto, H., Nugroho, R., & Maulana, A. (2022). The effect of problem-based learning on metacognitive ability in mathematics. Education Research International, 2022, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6437285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2313448
Veenman, M. V. J. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Definitions, distinctions, and research developments. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9267-5
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Pedagogy : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
