Potret Krisis Sosial-Ekologis Generasi Z: Analisis Cerpen Siswa SMA Peserta FLS3N dari Perspektif Sosiologi Sastra
https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i4.7170
Keywords:
krisis sosial-ekologis, generasi Z, sosiologi sastra, cerita pendek, FLS3NAbstract
Penelitian ini menyelidiki pandangan otentik Generasi Z dalam merespons krisis sosial-ekologis kontemporer melalui ciptaan sastra mereka. Berpijak pada kerangka sosiologi sastra, studi ini menganalisis korpus unik yang terdiri dari 13 cerita pendek karya siswa SMA untuk Festival dan Lomba Seni dan Sastra Siswa Nasional (FLS3N) di Kabupaten Sumedang, Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan Strukturalisme Genetik Lucien Goldmann dan prinsip-prinsip Ekokritik, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan pandangan dunia kolektif yang diekspresikan oleh para penulis muda dalam cerita pendek, di antarannya: (1) Ekonomi, (2) Ekologi, (3) Ruang Privat (Keluarga/Gender), dan (4) Psikologis (Kesehatan Mental). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan dominasi krisis di ranah personal, konflik ruang privat dan kerapuhan psikologis teridentifikasi secara signifikan di 12 dari 13 cerpen. Hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa krisis makro (ekonomi dan ekologi) dirasakan dan diekspresikan paling mendesak melalui dampaknya di ranah personal. Penelitian ini juga mengungkap adanya interseksionalitas isu yang kuat, di mana krisis ekonomi seringkali berfungsi sebagai pemicu konflik keluarga dan trauma psikologis. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa narasi-narasi tersebut menggambarkan potret sosiologis vital, yang mengartikulasikan sebuah kesadaran generasional yang ditandai oleh kewaspadaan kritis, kerentanan, dan harapan pada agensi kolektif sebagai respons terhadap krisis sistemik di lingkungan sosial siswa sebagai generasi Z
Downloads
References
American Psychological Association. (2018). Stress in America: Generation Z. APA Stress in America™ Survey.
Buell, L. (2005). The future of environmental criticism: Environmental crisis and literary imagination. Blackwell Publishing.
Crandon, T., & Scott, H. (2022). Voicing the unspeakable: The role of climate fiction (cli-fi) in processing eco-anxiety. Journal of Environmental Humanities, 14(3), 606–626. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-9941913
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage publications.
Dewi, N. (2016). Ekokritik dalam Sastra Indonesia: Kajian Sastra yang Memihak. Adabiyyāt: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 15(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2016.15102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14421/ajbs.2016.15102
Fischer, F., Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Goldman, S.R., & Reimann, P. (Eds.). (2018). International Handbook of the Learning Sciences (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617572 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315617572-1
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Harvard University Press.
Goldmann, L. (1975). Towards a Sociology of the Novel. Tavistock Publications.
Hickman, C., Marks, E., Pihkala, P., Clayton, S., Lewandowski, R. E., Mayall, E. E., Wray, B., Mellor, C., & van Susteren, L. (2021). Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: A global survey. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5(12), e863–e873. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00278-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00278-3
Juanda, J., Djumingin, S. ., R, M., Afandi, I. ., & Intang, D. (2024). Ecoliteracy digital short stories among students in Indonesia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(2), 254-270. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2024.014
Larasati, M. M. B., & Manut, A. M. (2022). Kajian Ekokritik Sastra: Representasi Lingkungan dan Alam dalam 50 Cerpen Tani Karya E. Rokajat Asura dkk. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra, 8(2), 715–725. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v8i2.1967 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v8i2.1967
Mattoni, A. (2017). A situated understanding of digital technologies in social movements: Media ecology and media practice approaches. Social Movement Studies, 16(4), 494–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1326978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1311250
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Nixon, R. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of the poor. Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061194
Ojala, M. (2021). Eco-anxiety and the climate-concerned youth: The role of emotions, hope, and agency. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 50, 208-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.03.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.04.009
Priporas, C. V., Stylos, N., & Fotiadis, A. K. (2017). Generation Z consumers’ expectations of interactions in smart retailing: A future agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 374–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.058
Schoon, I., & Henseke, G. (2022). Social inequalities in young people's mental distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: Do psychosocial resource factors matter? Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 820270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.820270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.820270
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.
Stephens, J. (2013). New directions in children's literature research. Routledge.
Swingewood, A., & Laurenson, D. (1972). The Sociology of Literature. MacGibbon & Kee.
Tsevreni, I., Proutsos, N., Tsevreni, M., & Tigkas, D. (2023). Generation Z worries, suffers and acts against climate crisis—The potential of sensing children’s and young people’s eco-anxiety: A critical analysis based on an integrative review. Climate, 11(8), 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11080171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cli11080171
Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today's super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy-and completely unprepared for adulthood--and what that means for the rest of us. Atria Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dedi Irawan, Syihabuddin Syihabuddin, Desi Ratna Ayu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
