Pemetaan Kompetensi Membaca dan Menulis Akademik Mahasiswa dan Artificial Intelligence dalam Praktik Literasi Ilmiah
https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i4.6884
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Keterampilan Akademik, Literasi Digital, Membaca Akademik, Menulis AkademikAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingkan keterampilan membaca dan menulis akademik antara mahasiswa dan AI guna mengidentifikasi perbedaan performa serta implikasinya terhadap literasi digital di perguruan tinggi. Data diperoleh dari 129 mahasiswa dan 8 output AI, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan uji Independent Samples T-Test berbasis pendekatan nonparametrik Mann-Whitney U karena asumsi normalitas tidak terpenuhi. Analisis dilakukan dengan bantuan program Jamovi 2.6.26 yang menghasilkan nilai statistik, p-value, interval kepercayaan, serta ukuran efek. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perbedaan signifikan pada keterampilan membaca (U = 181; p = 0,002; r = 0,650) maupun menulis akademik (U = 0,00; p < 0,001; r = 1,00). AI secara konsisten memperoleh skor lebih tinggi dibandingkan mahasiswa. Temuan ini menegaskan keunggulan teknis AI dalam mengolah teks akademik, sementara mahasiswa masih memiliki kelebihan pada aspek refleksi kritis, kreativitas, dan sensitivitas kontekstual. Penelitian ini berkontribusi dalam memperkaya kajian literasi akademik dengan menghadirkan perspektif komparatif antara manusia dan mesin, sekaligus memberikan dasar bagi pengembangan strategi pembelajaran yang lebih adaptif terhadap era digital berbasis kecerdasan buatan.
Downloads
References
Aladini, A., Ismail, S. M., Ahmad Saleem Khasawneh, M., & Shakibaei, G. (2025). Self-directed writing development across computer/AI-based tasks: Unraveling the traces on L2 writing outcomes, growth mindfulness, and grammatical knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 17, 100566. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100566
Alkamel, M. A. A., & Alwagieh, N. A. S. (2024). Utilizing an adaptable artificial intelligence writing tool (ChatGPT) to enhance academic writing skills among Yemeni university EFL students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, 101095. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101095
Alzubi, A. A. F., & Nazim, M. (2024). Students’ intrinsic motivation in EFL academic writing: Topic-based interest in focus. Heliyon, 10(1), e24169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24169
Arievitch, I. M. (2020). The vision of Developmental Teaching and Learning and Bloom’s Taxonomy of educational objectives. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 25, 100274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.01.007
Fontenelle-Tereshchuk, D. (2024). Academic writing and ChatGPT: Students transitioning into college in the shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic. Discover Education, 3(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00076-5
Gebremeskel, T. A., Bachore, M. M., & Bushisho, E. W. (2024). The effects of multiple intelligence based reading tasks on EFL students reading skills achievements: The case of university students in Ethiopia. Heliyon, 10(13), e33591. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33591
Goulart, L., Matte, M. L., Mendoza, A., Alvarado, L., & Veloso, I. (2024). AI or student writing? Analyzing the situational and linguistic characteristics of undergraduate student writing and AI-generated assignments. Journal of Second Language Writing, 66, 101160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101160
Herrmann-Werner, A., Festl-Wietek, T., Holderried, F., Herschbach, L., Griewatz, J., Masters, K., Zipfel, S., & Mahling, M. (2024). Assessing ChatGPT’s Mastery of Bloom’s Taxonomy Using Psychosomatic Medicine Exam Questions: Mixed-Methods Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2196/52113
Hou, J., Lee, J. F., & Doherty, S. (2024). What is next in mobile-assisted reading? Insights from a decade of eye tracking research into cognitive processes. Educational Research Review, 45, 100643. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100643
Huang, K.-J. (2024). Evaluating GPT-4’s Cognitive Functions Through the Bloom Taxonomy: Insights and Clarifications. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2196/56997
Huang, L., & Li, Y. (2023). Revisiting the relationships of n-gram measures to L2 writing proficiency: Comparisons between genres and connections to vocabulary levels. System, 118, 103136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103136
Jo, C. W. (2021). Short vs. extended adolescent academic writing: A cross-genre analysis of writing skills in written definitions and persuasive essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 53, 101014. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101014
Juanda, & Afandi, I. (2024). Assessing text comprehension proficiency: Indonesian higher education students vs ChatGPT. XLinguae, 17(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2024.17.01.04
Juanda, Azis, & Djumingin, S. (2024). Comparative Study of Local Wisdom Comprehension in Short Stories Between College Students and Ai Chatbots (Chatgpt and Gemini). Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 102(18), 6659–6668.
Juanda, Mahmudah, & Alfian Tuflih, M. (2024). Eco-literacy in the digital age: Comparing student comprehension with AI capabilities. Language Testing in Focus: An International Journal, 10, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltf.2024.10.01
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2025). Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1265–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
Li, J., & Mak, L. (2022). The effects of using an online collaboration tool on college students’ learning of academic writing skills. System, 105, 102712. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102712
Li, L., Yu, Q., Guan, Q., Li, H., & Luo, Y. (2024). Attention allocation in foreign language reading anxiety during lexical processing − An ERP study with cue-target paradigm. Brain and Cognition, 182, 106225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106225
Lin, Y. (2025). A reflection of learners’ motivation to read, self-assessment, critical thinking, and academic well-being in extensive and intensive reading offline instruction: A focus on self-determination theory. Learning and Motivation, 89, 102093. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2024.102093
Liu, M., Zhang, L. J., & Biebricher, C. (2024). Investigating students’ cognitive processes in generative AI-assisted digital multimodal composing and traditional writing. Computers & Education, 211, 104977. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104977
Liu, X., & Cui, Y. (2025). Eye tracking technology for examining cognitive processes in education: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 229, 105263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105263
Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
Meniado, J. C., Huyen, D. T. T., Panyadilokpong, N., & Lertkomolwit, P. (2024). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Experiences and perceptions of EFL learners in Thailand and Vietnam. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100313
Orschiedt, J., Schmickler, J., Nußer, V., Fischer, T., Hermsdörfer, J., & Krüger, M. (2023). Writing while walking: The impact of cognitive-motor multi-tasking on collision avoidance in human locomotion. Human Movement Science, 88, 103064. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2023.103064
Ou, A. W., Stöhr, C., & Malmström, H. (2024). Academic communication with AI-powered language tools in higher education: From a post-humanist perspective. System, 121, 103225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103225
Peng, P. B. T.-A. in C. D. and B. (2025). Understanding the relations between cognition and academic skills in the context of instruction. JAI. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.acdb.2024.10.003
Pérez-Fargallo, A., Marín-Restrepo, L., Diaz, M., & Arcas, J. A. P. (2024). Limitations in the Academic Writing Process of Postgraduate Students Between 2010 and 2020: What Tools Do We Have? In Teaching Innovation in Architecture and Building Engineering (pp. 615–629). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59644-5_35
Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2017). Exploring the relationship of organization and connection with scores in integrated writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 31, 98–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2016.08.005
Scherbakov, D. A., Hubig, N. C., Lenert, L. A., Alekseyenko, A. V, & Obeid, J. S. (2025). Natural Language Processing and Social Determinants of Health in Mental Health Research: AI-Assisted Scoping Review. JMIR Mental Health, 12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2196/67192
Seah, L. H. (2023). An exploratory study of teachers’ metalanguage use to support student writing in science: Foregrounding the science-language connections. Linguistics and Education, 78, 101253. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2023.101253
Tan, X. (2023). Stories behind the scenes: L2 students’ cognitive processes of multimodal composing and traditional writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 59, 100958. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2022.100958
Trakhman, L. M. S., Alexander, P. A., & Fusenig, J. (2025). Reading in print and digitally: Profiling and intervening in undergraduates’ multimodal text processing, comprehension, and calibration. Learning and Individual Differences, 118, 102627. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102627
Wang, Y., Gao, X., & Gui, M. (2025). Impact of retrieval prompts with posterior L1 glossing on novel words learning and processing during L2 reading: An eye-tracking study. System, 129, 103596. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103596
Wei, H., Yang, Y., & Chen, Y.-W. (2025). Multimodal review helpfulness prediction with a multi-level cognitive reasoning mechanism: A theory-driven graph learning model. Decision Support Systems, 191, 114406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2025.114406
West, J. (2023). Utilizing Bloom’s taxonomy and authentic learning principles to promote preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1), 100620. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100620
Yang, W., & Lin, C. (2025). Translanguaging with generative AI in EFL writing: Students’ practices and perceptions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 67, 101181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101181
Yao, Y., Sun, Y., Zhu, S., & Zhu, X. (2025). A Qualitative Inquiry Into Metacognitive Strategies of Postgraduate Students in Employing ChatGPT for English Academic Writing. European Journal of Education, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12824
Zhang, H., Shulgina, G., Fanguy, M., & Costley, J. (2022). Online peer editing: effects of comments and edits on academic writing skills. Heliyon, 8(7), e09822. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09822
Zhao, D. (2025). The Impact of AI-Enhanced Natural Language Processing Tools on Writing Proficiency: An Analysis of Language Precision, Content Summarization, and Creative Writing Facilitation. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 8055–8086. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13145-5
Zhao, Y., Liu, J., Ma, X., Huang, Z.-G., & Zhao, J. (2025). Microstructural lateralization of thalamocortical connections in individuals with a history of reading difficulties. NeuroImage, 308, 121071. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121071
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Juanda Juanda, Azis, Zul Fitrah Ramadhan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
