Islamic Education Teachers' Concerns and Curriculum Use in Implementing the Merdeka Curriculum: A CBAM-Based Study in Rural Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.9.1.2026.7907Keywords:
Curriculum Implementation, Merdeka Curriculum, Islamic Education, Teachers' Concerns, Concerns-Based Adoption Model, Rural EducationAbstract
This research is important to understand Islamic Education teachers’ concerns and their use of the curriculum in implementing the Merdeka Curriculum in rural areas, so that educational policies can be applied effectively and in alignment with local needs. The implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum represents a significant shift toward flexible, student-centred learning in Indonesian education. However, limited empirical evidence exists regarding how Islamic Education teachers, particularly in rural contexts, experience and enact this curriculum reform. Understanding teachers' concerns and instructional practices is crucial, as ineffective implementation may result in procedural compliance rather than meaningful pedagogical change. Addressing this gap, the present study investigates the implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum by Islamic Education teachers through the lens of the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). This study employed a qualitative case study design involving five Islamic Education teachers in rural secondary schools. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews, non-participant classroom observations, and document analysis of lesson plans, teaching modules, and assessment records. The research instruments were developed based on the Stages of Concern and Levels of Use constructs of CBAM. Data analysis was conducted through iterative qualitative coding guided by CBAM dimensions, supported by data triangulation across interviews, observations, and documents to enhance credibility. The findings reveal that teachers predominantly experienced informational and management concerns, indicating an early stage of curriculum adoption. Classroom practices were largely situated at mechanical, routine levels of use, characterized by procedural implementation rather than reflective adaptation. Although teachers reported increased student engagement, formative assessment practices remained inconsistent. These findings highlight the need for sustained, subject-specific professional development and structured mentoring to support more effective implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum in Islamic Education.
References
Alfikalia, A., Haryanto, H. C., & Widyaningsih, A. (2022). Dinamika Pengelolaan Program Merdeka Belajar - Kampus Merdeka Pada Kampus Swasta. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.5.1.2022.1557
Angelina, Bistari, & Halidjah, S. (2024). Development of Teaching Module for the Merdeka Curriculum with Nuances Critical Reasoning for Elementary School Students. Jurnal Paedagogy: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 11(3), 580–592. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v11i3.11815
Arfani, A. A. D. (2024). Challenges in Evaluating Islamic Education Learning in Schools: Implications for Educational Objectives. Tadibia Islamika, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.28918/tadibia.v4i1.2277
Bakar, A. S., Osaki, K., & Mwila, P. M. (2025). Influence of the Concern-Based Adoption Model (CBAM) and Tablet Use on Student Academic Performance in Geography: Evidence from Mikalama District, Tanzania. Data Plus, 03(02), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.62887/dataplus.003.02.0072
Barua, L., & Lockee, B. B. (2024). A Review of Strategies to Incorporate Flexibility in Higher Education Course Designs. Discover Education, 3(1), 127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00213-8
Bhaswara, N. A. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka dan Platform Merdeka Mengajar. In Kemendibudristek.
Brown, C., White, R., & Kelly, A. (2021). Teachers as Educational Change Agents: What Do We Currently Know? Findings from a Systematic Review. Emerald Open Research, 1(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1108/EOR-03-2023-0012
Buabeng, I., & Amo-Darko, B. (2025). Curriculum Reforms Without Foundation: The Effects of Inadequate Preparation in Curriculum Reforms on Ghanaian Teachers and the Education System. Curriculum Perspectives, 45(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-025-00309-7
Drayton, B., Bernstein, D., Schunn, C., & McKenney, S. (2020). Consequences of Curricular Adaptation Strategies for Implementation at Scale. Science Education, 104(6), 983–1007. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21595
Gunawan, G., Yanti, P. R., & Nelson. (2023). Methods for Achieving Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor Aspects in Islamic Religious Education Learning: A study at Senior High School in Rejang Lebong. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 981–991. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2793
Hakim, M. N., Solihah, K. Z., Ismail, F., Arhanuddin, I., & Prasetiyo, N. T. (2024). Optimizing the Merdeka Curriculum for Developing the Pancasila Student Profile through Project-Based Learning. Munaddhomah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 5(4), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.31538/munaddhomah.v5i4.1396
Hall, G. E. (1974). The Concerns-base Adoption Model: A Developmental Conceptualization of the Adoption Process within Educational Institutions. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1–23. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED111791.pdf
Ingtias, F. T., Ampera, D., Farihah, F., Amal, B. K., & Purba, A. S. (2022). Implementation of Teaching Practitioners In Improving The Quality of Learning and Implementing The Curriculum Merdeka Belajar. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.5.2.2022.1927
Jenkins, G. (2020). Teacher Agency: The Effects of Active and Passive Responses to Curriculum Change. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(1), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00334-2
Leavy, P. (2022). Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. Guilford Publications.
Lee, T., Cheng, Y. C., & Ko, J. (2018). Curriculum Reform with a School-Based Approach: Intellectual, Structural and Cultural Challenges. School Leadership & Management, 38(3), 278–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1386647
Lutfi, S., Fauzan, M., Surawan, S., & Arman, D. (2025). Application of Joyful Learning Method in Learning Tafsir Tarbawi for Islamic Religious Education (PAI) Students. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 8(3), 1412–1430. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.8.3.2025.6733
Magallanes, K., Chung, J. Y., & Lee, S. (2022). The Philippine Teachers Concerns on Educational Reform Using Concern Based Adoption Model. Frontiers in Education, 7(May), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.763991
Marthawati, C. R., & Adi, B. S. (2024). Learning Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 10(7), 4342–4348. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v10i7.7247
Min, M. (2017). Teachers who Initiate Changes with an Ebook-Integrated Curriculum: Revisiting the Developmental Assumptions of Stages of Concerns in the Concerns-Based Adoption Model. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 63(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/ajer.v63i1.56146
Mir, A. H. (2025). Learner-Centered Pedagogies: Transforming Education for the 21st Century. Journal of Accounting Research, Utility Finance and Digital Assets (JARUDA), 4(4), 383–387. https://doi.org/10.54443/jaruda.v3i4.217
Mujiburrahman, Ratnaya, I. G., Parwata, I. G. L. A., & Budhyani, I. D. A. M. (2025). Evaluation of the Merdeka Curriculum in Educational Institutions: A Systematic Literature Review of Strategies, Challenges, and Student Learning Outcomes. Jurnal Paedagogy: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 12(4), 1255–1268. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v12i4.17078
Rahmawatie, R., Rizal, S. U., & Syabrina, M. (2025). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Dasar. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(4), 4465–4471. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i4.7443
Ramli, M., & Ilhamsyah, R. (2024). Foundations and Contemporary Relevance of Salafi Islamic Education in Indonesia: Principles, Curriculum, and Moral Development. Heutagogia: Journal of Islamic Education, 4(2), 287–299. https://doi.org/10.18860/ua.v17i1.3252.5
Rogers, A. P. (2022). Exploring Secondary Teachers’ Perspectives on Implementing Competency‐Based Education. The Journal of Competency‐Based Education, 6(4), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1265
Romanowski, M. H., & Du, X. (2022). Education Transferring and Decentralized Reforms: The Case of Qatar. PROSPECTS, 52(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09478-x
Shahjahan, R. A., Estera, A. L., Surla, K. L., & Edwards, K. T. (2021). “Decolonizing” Curriculum and Pedagogy: A Comparative Review Across Disciplines and Global Higher Education Contexts. Review of Educational Research, 92(1), 73–113. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211042423
Wachidi, Jamu’in, M., Inayati, N. L., Rifai, A., Wicaksono, E., Maksum, M. N., & Vambudi, V. N. (2024). Teachers’ Stages of Concern in Implementing the Independent Curriculum and its Contribution to Achieving the Pancasila Student Profile in Indonesia. CAMA Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, 7(3), 285–292.
Zhao, G., Fan, B., Wang, Y., Aliyev, M., & Sun, X. (2024). Investigating Chinese In-service Teachers’ Concerns About Teaching Thinking Using the Concern-Based Adoption Model (CBAM). Journal of Education and Development, 8(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.20849/jed.v8i2.1426
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Irawadi Irawadi, Bustanul Iman RN, Bulu Bulu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with JSGP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
