Enhancing Elementary School Students’ Understanding of the Character Values of the Formulators of Pancasila through Problem-Based Learning and Character Dilemma Cards

Authors

  • Nurma Febriana Hariyono Universitas Muhammadyah Gresik
  • Nourma Yunita Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik
  • Ismail Marzuki Universitas Muhammadiyah Gresik

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30605/cjpe.10.1.2027.9761

Keywords:

Problem-Based Learning, Kartu Dilema Tokoh, Pancasila Education, Character Education, Elementary Education

Abstract

The urgency of this research lies in enhancing elementary school students’ understanding of the character values of the formulators of Pancasila through problem-based learning and character dilemma cards. Character learning in Pancasila Education at the elementary school level should extend beyond factual knowledge of historical figures by enabling students to interpret character values and connect them with decision-making in everyday situations. The urgency of this study arises from the initial condition of fourth-grade students, whose understanding of the characters of the formulators of Pancasila remained suboptimal, indicating the need for more contextual, dialogic, and problem-oriented learning. This study aimed to examine the implementation of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) assisted by Kartu Dilema Tokoh and its changes in students’ understanding of the characters of the formulators of Pancasila. The study employed Classroom Action Research based on the Kemmis and McTaggart model through two cycles of planning, action, observation, and reflection. The participants were 25 fourth-grade students at UPT SD Negeri 52 Gresik, Indonesia. Data were collected through learning outcome tests, student activity observations, PBL implementation observations, student worksheets, and documentation, and were analyzed descriptively. The findings showed that the mean score increased from 67.28 at the pre-action stage to 78.40 in Cycle I and 88.00 in Cycle II. Classical mastery increased from 52% to 64% and 88%, exceeding the 75% success criterion. Observations also indicated improved participation, dilemma analysis, reasoning, consideration of consequences, and connections between character values and everyday situations. The findings suggest that integrating PBL with Kartu Dilema Tokoh can support more active, contextual, and meaningful character learning.

References

Ahdhianto, E., Marsigit, M., Haryanto, H., & Nurfauzi, Y. (2020). Improving fifth-grade students’ mathematical problem-solving and critical thinking skills using problem-based learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 2012–2021. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080539

Bamkin, S. (2020). The taught curriculum of moral education at Japanese elementary school: The role of classtime in the broad curriculum. Contemporary Japan, 32(2), 218–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/18692729.2020.1747780

Cheng, E. W. L. (2022). Revisiting the concept of values taught in education through Carroll’s corporate social responsibility. Sustainability, 14(18), 11280. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811280

Erdem, C. (2024). A comparative meta-analysis of the effects of problem-based learning model on K-12 students’ cognitive outputs. Educational Studies, 50(6), 1498–1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2022.2103650

Hong, R., & Hong, Y. (2022). Experience, imagination and integration: Creative drama for values education. Sustainability, 14(18), 11113. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811113

Huo, Y., Cheng, H., & Xie, J. (2025). Laying the foundations of phronesis (practical wisdom) through moral dilemma discussions in Chinese primary schools. Journal of Moral Education, 54(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2023.2291990

Jegstad, K. M., Heggernes, S. L., Jøsok, E., Ryen, E., Svanes, I. K., & Tørnby, H. (2025). Approaches to critical thinking in primary education classrooms: A systematic review. Educational Research Review, 48, 100711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100711

Khotimah, K., Ajat, A., & Priyanti, N. (2026). Developing local culture-based puzzle books to increase reading interest in children aged 5–6 years. Cokroaminoto Journal of Primary Education, 9(4), 1779–1794. https://doi.org/10.30605/cjpe.9.4.2026.9568

Kilby, B. (2025). Philosophy for/with children: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 12(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijcer.2025.12.1.703

Merritt, J., Lee, M. Y., Rillero, P., & Kinach, B. M. (2017). Problem-based learning in K–8 mathematics and science education: A literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1674

Nurasiah, I., Sumantri, M. S., Nurhasanah, N., & Casmana, A. R. (2022). Cultural values’ integration in character development in elementary schools: The Sukuraga as learning media. Frontiers in Education, 7, 849218. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.849218

Omeje, H. O., & Ogwo, B. A. (2022). Students achievement and interest in elementary structural design: The fixed vs floating facilitator approaches of problem based learning. International Journal of Training Research, 20(2), 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1989012

Parker, R., Thomsen, B. S., & Berry, A. (2022). Learning through play at school: A framework for policy and practice. Frontiers in Education, 7, 751801. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.751801

Pinquart, M., & Fischer, A. (2022). Associations of parenting styles with moral reasoning in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Moral Education, 51(4), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2021.1933401

Sarkadi, S., Casmana, A. R., Hisyam, C. J., & Wardatussa’idah, I. (2022). Integrating character education into the RECE learning model through Pancasila and Citizenship Education subjects. Frontiers in Education, 7, 841037. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.841037

Sidiq, Y., Ishartono, N., Desstya, A., Prayitno, H. J., Anif, S., & Hidayat, M. L. (2021). Improving elementary school students’ critical thinking skill in science through HOTS-based science questions: A quasi-experimental study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.30891

Wei, C., & Chen, L. (2025). The effects of Philosophy for Children on children’s cognitive development: A three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Intelligence, 13(10), 130. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13100130

Wu, C. (2021). Training teachers in China to use the Philosophy for Children approach and its impact on critical thinking skills: A pilot study. Education Sciences, 11(5), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050206

Yuliana, Y., Ashadi, F., & Siswono, H. (2026). Improving letter recognition ability in children aged 4–5 years through the letter card play method. Cokroaminoto Journal of Primary Education, 9(4), 1856–1867. https://doi.org/10.30605/cjpe.9.4.2026.9628

Zhu, X., Shek, D. T. L., & Yu, L. (2022). Parental and school influences on character attributes among Chinese adolescents. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 10, 817471. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.817471

Downloads

Published

2026-10-20

How to Cite

Enhancing Elementary School Students’ Understanding of the Character Values of the Formulators of Pancasila through Problem-Based Learning and Character Dilemma Cards. (2026). Cokroaminoto Journal of Primary Education, 9(4), 1928-1945. https://doi.org/10.30605/cjpe.10.1.2027.9761