Personal Experience-Based Direct Writing Activity And Elementary Students’ Descriptive Writing: A Quasi-Experimental Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30605/cjpe.9.4.2026.9669Keywords:
Direct Writing Activity, Personal Experience, Guided Writing, Writing Skills, Descriptive Text, Elementary SchoolAbstract
Abstract. The urgency of this study lies in the need for personal experience-based writing activities to improve elementary students’ descriptive writing skills. This study compared the development of descriptive writing skills among students who received a personal experience-based Direct Writing Activity (DWA) and those who received Guided Writing. A quasi-experimental non-equivalent control-group pretest–posttest design was used. Thirty fifth-grade students from two intact classes were included in the analysis, with 15 students in each condition. The intervention group completed prewriting, drafting, draft exchange, revision, and sharing stages, whereas the comparison group received teacher guidance through models, keywords, and guiding questions. Writing performance was assessed using an analytic rubric covering content, organization, grammar, word and sentence choice, and writing mechanics. The intervention group’s mean score increased from 61 to 80, with a normalized gain of 0.49, whereas the comparison group’s mean increased from 55 to 67, with a normalized gain of 0.18. Posttest scores differed significantly between groups (Z = −3.206, p = .001, r = .585), and the normalized gains also differed significantly, Welch’s t(16.033) = 6.318, p < .001. Teacher and student activities were rated very good in both groups. These findings provide preliminary evidence that students in the personal experience-based DWA class demonstrated greater growth in descriptive writing performance than those in the Guided Writing class. Interpretation is limited by the use of two classes from one school, a small sample, a short intervention, and the absence of interrater reliability evidence.
References
Allal, L. (2021). Involving primary school students in the co-construction of a formative assessment tool for writing. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1951164
Baron, L. S., & Arbel, Y. (2022). An implicit–explicit framework for intervention methods in developmental language disorder. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 31(4), 1557–1573. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00172
Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2013). Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029692
Camacho, A., Alves, R. A., & Boscolo, P. (2021). Writing motivation in school: A systematic review of empirical research in the early twenty-first century. Educational Psychology Review, 33, 213–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09530-4
De Smedt, F., Graham, S., & Van Keer, H. (2019). The bright and dark side of writing motivation: Effects of explicit instruction and peer assistance. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(2), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1461598
De Smedt, F., Graham, S., & Van Keer, H. (2020). ‘It takes two’: The added value of structured peer-assisted writing in explicit writing instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101835
Faturohmah, R., Pratiwi, I. M., Carlian, Y., Ramdhan, D. F., & Mangkuwibawa, H. (2025). Development of Math Fun: An Android-based learning media assisted by iSpring for elementary mathematics. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 12(2), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v12i2.20743
Faturohmah, R., Pratiwi, I. M., Carlian, Y., Ramdhan, D. F., & Mangkuwibawa, H. (2025). Development of Math Fun: An Android-based learning media assisted by iSpring for elementary school mathematics. Al Ibtida: Journal of Islamic Primary Teacher Education 12(2), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v12i2.20743
Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(6), 396–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.488703
Graham, S., Collins, A. A., & Ciullo, S. (2024). Evidence-based recommendations for teaching writing. Education 3–13, 52(7), 979–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2024.2357893
Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. A., McKeown, D., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029185
Graham, S., Liu, X., Bartlett, B., et al. (2018). Reading for writing: A meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions on writing. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 243–284. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654317746927
Habibi, M., Sukirno, Taufina, Sukma, E., Suriani, A., & Putera, R. F. (2020). Direct Writing Activity: A strategy in expanding narrative writing skills for elementary schools. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4374–4383. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081003
Harris, K. R., Graham, S., & Adkins, M. (2015). Practice-based professional development and Self-Regulated Strategy Development for Tier 2, at-risk writers in Grade 2. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.02.003
Kent, S. C., & Wanzek, J. (2016). The relationship between component skills and writing quality and production across developmental levels. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 570–601. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315619491
Khotimah, H., Saefuddin, A., & Pratiwi, I. M. (2025). Enhancing basic science process skills through Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL): A classroom action research at a Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Al-Aulad: Journal of Islamic Basic Education, 8(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.15575/al-aulad.v8i1.45544
Kim, Y. S. G., Schatschneider, C., Wanzek, J., Gatlin, B., & Al Otaiba, S. (2017). Writing evaluation: Rater and task effects on the reliability of writing scores for children in Grades 3 and 4. Reading and Writing, 30(6), 1287–1310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9724-6
Kim, Y. S. G., Yang, D., Reyes, M., & Connor, C. (2021). Writing instruction improves students’ writing skills differentially depending on focal instruction and children. Educational Research Review, 34, 100408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100408
Martalina, M. N., Ramdhani, S., & Nurcahyono, N. A. (2026). The Effect of the Experiential Learning Model on Elementary School Students’ Writing Skills and Critical Thinking Skills. Cokroaminoto Journal of Primary Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.30605/cjpe.9.1.2026.8038
Nazmudindireja, M. G., Suciati, & Nirmala, S. D. (2025). The Effect of the Multimodal-Based Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) Learning Model on Improving Elementary School Students’ Basic Literacy and Critical Thinking Skills. Cokroaminoto Journal of Primary Education, 8(2), 761–776. https://doi.org/10.30605/cjpe.8.2.2025.6165
Puranik, C., Lemons, C., Balasubramanian, L., McRae, M., Hallman, B., Petscher, Y., & Al Otaiba, S. (2026). Peer assisted writing strategies (PAWS) for kindergarten: An efficacy study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 30(3), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2026.2618089
Uzun, N. B., Alici, D., & Aktas, M. (2019). Reliability of the analytic rubric and checklist for the assessment of story writing skills: G and decision study in generalizability theory. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.169
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Restia Khoerunisa, Hilman Mangkuwibawa, Inne Marthyane Pratiwi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with CJPE agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
