Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Menengah Pertama pada Materi Geometri Berdasarkan Teori Polya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v9i2.9578Keywords:
Problem solving ability, Geometry, PolyaAbstract
This study aims to describe the mathematical problem-solving abilities of junior high school students in geometry, particularly right triangles using the Pythagorean Theorem, based on Polya’s problem-solving steps. This study employed a descriptive qualitative method involving 18 eighth-grade students selected through purposive sampling in the even semester of the 2027 academic year. Data were collected through a mathematical problem-solving ability test, interviews, and documentation. The research instrument consisted of six essay questions that met the criteria of validity, reliability, difficulty level, and discrimination index, making them suitable for measuring students’ problem-solving abilities. Data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, which included data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing. Polya’s problem-solving indicators were used as a framework for organizing and interpreting the test and interview data. The results showed that the average mathematical problem-solving ability score was 44.11. Based on the ability categories, 15.79% of students were categorized as very good, 35.39% as good, 24.18% as sufficient, and 8.82% as poor. Based on Polya’s problem-solving indicators, students demonstrated the highest ability in carrying out the solution plan (96.29%), followed by devising a solution plan (88.88%), understanding the problem (50%), while the lowest ability was in reviewing the solution (11.11%). Students’ difficulties generally occurred in understanding the problem and drawing conclusions from the solutions obtained. Overall, the mathematical problem-solving ability of students in geometry at SMPN 10 Kerinci was categorized as sufficient, with an average score of 44.11%.References
Amelia, R., Chotimah, S., & Putri, D. (2021). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Daring Pada Materi Geometri SMP dengan Pendekatan Project Based Learning Berbantuan Software Wingeom. 05(01), 759–769. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/CENDEKIA.V5I1.417
Asdamayanti, N., Yanty, E., Nasution, P., & Sari, M. (2023). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Madrasah Aliyah pada Materi SPLTV. 07(January), 1141–1152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i1.2084 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i2.2084
Christ Sarah, Nyoman Karma, A. K. R. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Digugus III Cakranegara. 2(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.29303/prospek.v2i1.60 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/prospek.v2i1.60
Fariha, R. (2016). ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH. 6, 43–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v6i1.8080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v6i1.8080
Handayani, U. F. (2024). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa smp dalam menyelesaikan soal bangun datar ditinjau dari level van hiele. 03(02), 271–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v3i2.1731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/pme.v3i2.1731
Himawan, R. F., & Sulaiman, R. (2021). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Matematika Menurut Teori Polya Ditinjau Berdasarkan Kecemasan Matematika. 10(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v10n1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.26740/mathedunesa.v10n1.p1-9
Komarudin. (2016). Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pada Materi Peluang Berdasarkan High Order Thinking Dan Pemberian Scaffolding. VIII(1), 202–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30739/darussalam.v8i1.96
Luthfiyah, I., Simamora, R. E., & Rahayu, S. W. (2024). EKSPLORASI PROSES PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS 8 SEKOLAH MENENGAH PERTAMA DALAM. 6(1), 30–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35334/meta.v6i1.5427
Mahfudy, S., & Afriana, H. (2024). Identifikasi Kesulitan Siswa dalam Memecahkan Masalah Geometri Berdasarkan Tingkatan Berfikir Van Hiele. 4(2), 97–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.55099/jmt.v4i2.163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55099/jmt.v4i2.163
Midawati. (2022). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Masalah Berdasarkan Langkah Polya. 8(3), 831–837. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i3.2589 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v8i3.2589
Mulin Nu’man, R. A. (2023). Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Geometri. 3, 49–55.
Rahmayanti, I., & Maryati, I. (2021). PLUSMINUS : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Kesalahan Siswa SMP pada Soal Pemecahan Masalah Berdasarkan Tahapan Teori Newman. 1(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v1i1.873 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/plusminus.v1i1.1026
Risma Amelia1, Siti Chotimah2, D. P. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Daring Pada Materi Geometri SMP dengan Pendekatan Project Based Learning Berbantuan Software Wingeom. 2, 45–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i1.417
Safa Melinda, T., Sugeng Sutiarso, & Rangga Firdaus. (2026). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis peserta didik pada materi statistika. Mandalika Mathematics and Educations Journal, 8(1 SE-Articles), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.29303/jm.v8i1.11269 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jm.v8i1.11269
Sagita, D. K., Ermawati, D., & Riswari, L. A. (2023). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. 9(2), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i2.4609 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i2.4609
Saija, L. M. (2024). Analisis dan Upaya Peningkatan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP Kelas VII dan VIII dalam Empat Tahun Terakhir. 10(November), 160–173. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52166/inspiramatika.v10i2.8035 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52166/inspiramatika.v10i2.8035
Syarifah, R., Permadi, H., Qohar, A., & Anwar, L. (2023). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Geometri Siswa berdasarkan Self-Regulated Learning Students ’ Problem Solving Abilities of Geometry Transformation Based on Self- Regulated Learning. 13(03). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v13i03.22185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v13i03.22185
Ully, A. C., & Hakim, D. L. (2022). Jurnal Didactical Mathematics Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa dengan Tahapan Polya. 4(April), 156–162. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/dmj.v2i2.2074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/dm.v4i1.2014
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Deyang Hazila, Eline Yanty Putri Nasution, M.Pd

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.












