Integrasi Proyek dan Asesmen dalam Pembelajaran Matematika: Studi Literatur tentang Paradigma Baru Evaluasi Autentik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v9i1.7973Keywords:
Authentic Assessment, Project-Based Learning, Evaluation ParadigmAbstract
The transformation of 21st-century education demands a fundamental shift in the paradigm of mathematics learning, from one that initially focused on mastering abstract concepts to one that is more meaningful, contextual, and oriented towards developing students' authentic competencies. This study aims to examine in depth the integration of projects and assessments in mathematics learning as an effort to build a new paradigm of authentic evaluation that is in line with the demands of modern education. The method used is a systematic literature review of various previous studies discussing the implementation of authentic assessment and project-based learning, especially in the context of mathematics education. The results of the review indicate that most studies still position projects and assessments as two separate components, rather than as a mutually supportive unit within a complete learning framework. This study reveals conceptual and practical gaps in the integration of these two approaches, particularly regarding the design of evaluation instruments that can assess both the process and learning outcomes holistically. Thus, this study offers a conceptual synthesis that the integration of projects and authentic assessments can become a new paradigm of evaluation in mathematics learning, which not only assesses cognitive abilities but also develops students' creativity, collaboration, reflection, and higher-order thinking skills. The implications of this study are expected to strengthen the theoretical foundation and provide direction for the development of assessment models that are contextual, adaptive, and aligned with the Independent Learning policy and the needs of 21st-century learning.
Downloads
References
Dewi, R. K., Yusuf, M., & Subagya, S. (2025). Implementation of Vygotsky’s Theory of Social Constructivism in Learning Pancasila Education in Elementary Schools As Strengthening Cooperation Attitudes. Jurnal Paedagogy: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan, 12(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v12i1.13949
Jamaluddin, M., & Faroh, N. (2025). Developing Authentic Assessment: Project Assessment on Mathematics Learning Evaluation by Using E-Learning. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v5i3.729
Kasimatis, K., Papageorgiou, T. (2020). Creating authentic learning and assessment environments. International Conference on Education and New Developments. 58-62. https://doi.org/10.36315/2020end013
Masamah, L., Tuslim, T., Ningrum, A., Hidayati, Y. M., & Sutarni, S. (2025). Analisis Implementasi Asesmen Autentik dalam Pembelajaran Matematika di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. JIPMat (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 10(2), 304–311. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v10i2.2295
Ningsih, D. P., & Martoni, A. (2025). Asesmen berbasis proyek dalam pendidikan STEM: Pendekatan untuk mendorong problem solving dan inovasi siswa. Mandala Widya: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.71094/mandalawidya.v1i2.106
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The state of learning outcomes worldwide. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/
Pahriah, P., Ratnaya, I. G., Parwata, I. G. L. A., & Budhyani, I. D. A. M. (2015–2025). Authentic Assessment in Chemistry Education at Senior High Schools and Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review (2015–2025). Traektoriâ Nauki, 11(7), 1013. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.120-10
Paudel, M. (2024). Teachers’ Understanding and Implementation of Authentic Assessment in the Integrated Curriculum for Grades 1 to 3: The Case of Nepal. 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.58197/prbl/ycpe2495
Putri, I. D., Adisel, A., Sari, D. I. P., Novera, A., & Albab, N. (2022). Problematika dalam Implementasi Penilaian Autentik pada Kurikulum 2013. Journal of Education and Instruction, 5(1), 140–147. https://doi.org/10.31539/joeai.v5i1.3410
Robi’ah, W. R. (2025). Authentic Assessment in Kurikulum Merdeka: Benefits, Challenges, and Implementation Strategies. Deleted Journal, 3(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.61787/a9zpxd36
Syaifuddin, M. (2020). Implementation of authentic assessment on mathematics teaching: Study on junior high school teachers. International Journal of Education and Research, 8(9), 101–110. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1272387
Tan, H., & Kidman, G. (2021). Authentic assessment in stem education: an integrative review of research. In T. Barkatsas, & T. McLaughlin (Eds.), Authentic Assessment and Evaluation Approaches and Practices in a Digital Era: A Kaleidoscope of Perspectives (1st ed., pp. 24-52). (Global Education in the 21st Century Series). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501577002
Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2024). A Systematic Literature Review on Authentic Assessment in Higher Education: Best Practices for the Development of 21st Century Skills, and Policy Considerations. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, Article 101425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101425
Widana, I. W., & Sopandi, A. T. (2021). Development of an authentic assessment model in mathematics learning: A STEM approach. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 5(2), 99–112. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/irje/article/view/12992
Zannurrain, M. F., Sari, D. P., & Prasetyo, E. (2024). Systematic Literature Review (SLR): Efektivitas Penilaian Autentik pada Pembelajaran Matematika. Diferensial: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 89–98. Retrieved from https://jurnal.unimen.cloud/diferensial/article/view/8702
Zhang, Q., Zhang, X., & Liu, J. (2021). A holistic review of authentic assessment in mathematics education. Brill Publications. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501577_005
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Baharuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
