Gender Representation In The English Textbook: “My Next Words” For Fourth-Grade Students

https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i4.4443

Authors

  • Reviana Azzahra Karsena Universitas Sebelas Maret
  • Ellisa Indriyani Putri Handayani Universitas Sebelas Maret

Keywords:

gender representation; textbook; English for young learner

Abstract

This study was aimed to investigate gender representation in an English Textbook entitled Student’s Book My Next Words for Elementary School which published by The Republic of Indonesia’s Ministry of Education and Culture in 2021 and students opinion related gender equality. This study used a qualitative research with content analysis design. Porecca’ (1984) framework was adopted for analyzing the female and male representation in the English textbook: omission (the ratio of females to males) in texts and illustrations, firstness, occupational visibility, noun, masculine generic construction, and adjective. The result of gender omission is not too high with the average ratio of females to male 1:1.03. For social dominance was not found in the textbook. The result of this study from the variants of firstness, occupation, noun, and  masculine generic for males are varier than for females. Some stereotypes were found such as cooking for females’ activity and the breadwinner role for males. A limitation of the study is this research focuses on one textbook only. Thus, this study can’t be generalized. For this purpose, another study with a larger sample would be required a deeper analysis of the picture of the EFL textbook. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilar, J. S. (2021). Gender Representation in EFL Textbooks in Basic Education in Mexico. MEXTESOL Journal, 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v45n1-11

Al-Qatawneh, S., & Al Rawashdeh, A. (2019). Gender representation in the Arabic language textbook for the ninth grade approved by the Ministry of Education for use in schools in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.12.001

Aljuaythin, W. (2018). Gender Representation in EFL Textbooks in Saudi Arabia: A Critical Discourse Analysis Approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(5), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.7575/AIAC.IJALEL.V.7N.5P.151 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.5p.151

Cameron D (2014) Gender and language ideologies. In: Ehrlich S, Meyerhoff M, Holmes J (eds) The handbook of langauge, gender, and sexuality. Blackwell, London DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248.ch14

Catalán, R. M. J. (2010). Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign and second languages. . Macmillan UK: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274938

Cunningsworth , A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Heineman: Oxford.

Creswell, J. W. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Second Edition. U.S.A: SAGE Publications.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis the critical study of language. London: Routledge DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368

Mortelmans, T. (2022). Generic he, invisible others Contrastive study on the gendering of pronouns in Dutch, English, and German. Thesis. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366123069_Generic_he_invisible_others_Contrastive_study_on_the_gendering_of_pronouns_in_Dutch_English_and_German

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images (Second Edition). London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203619728

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. California: Sage Production.

Lee, J. F. K. (2016). Gender representation in Japanese EFL textbooks – a corpus study. Gender and Education, 30(3), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1214690 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2016.1214690

L. Zhang, Y. Zhang and R. Cao. (2022). “Can we stop cleaning the house and make some food, Mum?”: A critical investigation of gender representation in China's English textbooks. Linguistics and Education 69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2022.101058

Maesaroh, D.T., Asih, Y.U., & Suhatmady, B. (2022). Does the English Textbook for Young Learners in Indonesia Promote Gender Equality?. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 35-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v7i1.1152 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v7i1.1152

Medawattegedera, V. V. (2018). Representing women ‘Our Way’: An english language teaching television programme in Sri Lanka. Society and Culture in South Asia, 4(1), 94–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/2393861717730621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2393861717730621

Porreca, K. L. (1984). Sexism in current ESL textbooks. TESOL Quarterly, 18(4), 705. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586584

Ramadani, R. F., & Novianti, M. (2021). Gender Representations In Indonesian English Language Teaching (Elt) Textbook Titled “Bahasa Inggris Untuk Sma/Ma/Smk/Mak Kelas X”. Eltr Journal, 5(2), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.37147/eltr.v5i2.121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37147/eltr.v5i2.121

Reeves, H., & Baden, S. (2000). Gender and Development: Concepts and Definitions. University of Sussex.

Rezai, A., Farokhipour, S., & Azizi, Z. (2021). A Comparative Study of Gender Representation in Iranian English High School Books and TouchStone Series: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Iranian Journal of Comparative Education, 1458-1475. 10.22034/ijce.2021.262839.1283

Su, Q., Liu, P., Wei, W. et al. Occupational gender segregation and gendered language in a language without gender: trends, variations, implications for social development in China. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 8, 133 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00799-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00799-6

SOLO, R., & TORAJA, M. T. (2023). Universitas Cokroaminoto Palopo, suparman@ uncp. ac. id. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 8(1).

Wang,Y., Barmby, P., & Bolden, D. (2015). Understanding Linear Function: A Comparison of Selected Textbooks from England and Shanghai. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(1), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9674-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9674-x

Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics 5th Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Widaningsih, L. (2017). Relasi gender dalam keluarga: Internalisasi nilai-nilai kesetaraan dalam memperkuat fungsi keluarga. Tim Pokja Gender Bidang Pendidikan Dinas Pendidikan Provinsi Jawa Barat, 1-7.

Wijayanti, F., Miqawati, A. H., Huda, I., & Mujib, A. (2022). Revealing Gender Bias on ELT Textbook: A Critical Discourse Analysis. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Science, Humanity and Public Health (ICOSHIP 2021), 645, 158–161. https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.220207.025 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220207.025

Yulizar, Y. (2016). An Analysis of Aims and Approach of a Textbook: “Look Ahead English Course For Senior High School Students Year X”. Jurnal As-Salam, 1(2), 129–138. Retrieved from https://jurnal-assalam.org/index.php/JAS/article/view/65

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Karsena, R. A., & Ellisa Indriyani Putri Handayani. (2024). Gender Representation In The English Textbook: “My Next Words” For Fourth-Grade Students. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 10(4), 4291–4304. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i4.4443

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories