Pengaruh Beban Administrasi Guru dan Kesejahteraan Guru terhadap Efektivitas Pengajaran dalam Implementasi Kebijakan Merdeka Belajar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.9.2.2026.9031Keywords:
Beban Administrasi, Efektivitas Pengajaran, Kesejehteraan Guru, Merdeka BelajaraAbstract
Latar belakang penelitian ini didasari oleh pentingnya peran guru dalam menjaga kualitas pengajaran di tengah tuntutan administrasi pembelajaran dan kebutuhan kesejahteraan profesional. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh beban administrasi guru dan kesejahteraan guru terhadap efektivitas pengajaran pada implementasi kebijakan Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Dasar Kecamatan Gedung Meneng, Kabupaten Tulang Bawang. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan analisis regresi linear berganda. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner dan dianalisis menggunakan aplikasi JASP melalui uji parsial, uji simultan, dan koefisien determinasi. Hasil analisis deskriptif menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata skor beban administrasi guru sebesar 55,84, kesejahteraan guru sebesar 47,40, dan efektivitas pengajaran sebesar 91,78. Hasil regresi menunjukkan bahwa beban administrasi guru berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap efektivitas pengajaran dengan koefisien regresi B = 0,200, t = 2,191, dan p = 0,033. Kesejahteraan guru juga berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap efektivitas pengajaran dengan koefisien regresi B = 0,401, t = 2,615, dan p = 0,012. Secara simultan, beban administrasi guru dan kesejahteraan guru berpengaruh signifikan terhadap efektivitas pengajaran dengan nilai F = 6,017 dan p = 0,005. Nilai R² = 0,204 menunjukkan bahwa kedua variabel menjelaskan 20,4% variasi efektivitas pengajaran, sedangkan 79,6% sisanya dipengaruhi oleh faktor lain di luar model penelitian. Dengan demikian, meskipun kedua variabel berpengaruh signifikan, kontribusinya masih terbatas. Temuan ini menegaskan pentingnya pengelolaan administrasi yang efektif dan peningkatan kesejahteraan guru untuk mendukung kualitas pengajaran.
References
Abdillah, C., & Rahayu, P. Y. R. (2023). Media pembelajaran inovatif berbasis edutainment untuk pengembangan keprofesian berkelanjutan bagi guru sekolah dasar. Jurnal IPMAS, 3(2), 88–96. https://doi.org/10.54065/ipmas.3.2.2023.305
Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018). Teaching and learning international survey (TALIS): Conceptual framework. OECD Education Working Papers, 187, 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
Collie, R. J. (2020). COVID-19 and teachers’ somatic burden, stress, and emotional exhaustion: Examining the role of principal leadership and workplace buoyancy. Educational Psychology, 40(9), 1058–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1796027
Collie, R. J. (2021). Teacher wellbeing and social-emotional competence: Implications for educational practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 646739. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646739
Collie, R. J., Granziera, H., & Martin, A. J. (2018). Teachers’ perceived autonomy support and adaptability: An investigation employing the job demands-resources model as a motivational framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.001
Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2018). The dynamic approach to school improvement: Main features and impact. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1384443
Dreer, B. (2023). On the outcomes of teacher wellbeing: A systematic review of research. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1205179. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1205179
Eddy, C. L., Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M. (2020). Single-item teacher stress and coping measures: Concurrent and predictive validity. School Psychology, 35(4), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000368
Fackler, S., Malmberg, L. E., & Sammons, P. (2021). An international perspective on teacher well-being and job satisfaction. Oxford Review of Education, 47(6), 757–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2021.1905617
Fikriansyah, D. A., Al Maliki, M., Salendu, F. S., & Fadillah, R. (2023). Flipbook sebagai inovasi media pembelajaran digital: Mempersiapkan pendidikan menghadapi dan memfasilitasi pembelajaran abad 21. Jurnal Literasi Digital, 3(3), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.54065/jld.3.3.2023.369
Hascher, T., & Waber, J. (2021). Teacher well-being: A systematic review of the research literature from the year 2000–2019. Educational Research Review, 34, 100411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100411
Jumarniati, & Fitriani. (2023). Optimizing the freedom teaching platform application (PMM) through the cluster PAUD learning community. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Bagi Masyarakat, IPMAS, 3(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.54065/ipmas.3.1.2023.295
Jusniani, N., Nopianti, H., Arreski, D. F., & Kewajiban, T. H. (2025). Peningkatan kompetensi guru Sekolah Dasar Islam Kreatif Kabupaten Cianjur melalui pelatihan numerasi berbasis kearifan lokal Cianjur dalam mendukung Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal IPMAS, 5(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.54065/ipmas.5.2.2025.615
Kemendikdasmen. (2026). Apa itu Ruang GTK? Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2018 tentang Pemenuhan Beban Kerja Guru, Kepala Sekolah, dan Pengawas Sekolah. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Kim, K. N. (2019). Teachers’ administrative workload crowding out instructional activities. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1572592
Kim, L. E., & Asbury, K. (2020). Like a rug had been pulled from under you: The impact of COVID-19 on teachers in England. Frontiers in Education, 5, 582664. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.582664
Klusmann, U., Richter, D., & Lüdtke, O. (2016). Teachers’ emotional exhaustion and teaching quality. Educational Psychology, 36(5), 1202–1220. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2015.1035698
Kurrle, L. M., & Warwas, J. (2025). Teacher well-being—A conceptual systematic review (2020–2023). Education Sciences, 15(6), 766. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060766
Lubis, R., Harahap, N., & Siregar, D. (2025). Dampak beban administratif dalam implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka terhadap efektivitas pengajaran guru sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 11(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.29407/jpdn.v11i1.23456
Madigan, D. J., & Kim, L. E. (2021). Towards an understanding of teacher attrition: A meta-analysis of burnout, job satisfaction, and teachers’ intentions to quit. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 103425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103425
Muhammadi, M., Meizatri, R., Yolanda, E., & Anggria, V. D. (2026). Implementasi evaluasi pembelajaran berbasis digital di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Literasi Digital, 6(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.54065/jld.6.1.2026.1133
Mulyasa, E. (2021). Menjadi guru penggerak Merdeka Belajar. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Norman, E. (2024). Exploring teacher workload challenges in the Merdeka Curriculum era: A NASA-TLX-based analysis of administrative task impact on performance and well-being. Proceeding of International Conference on Education, Society and Humanity, 2(2). https://ejournal.unuja.ac.id/index.php/icesh
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d0bc92a-en
OECD. (2025). The demands of teaching: Results from TALIS 2024. OECD Publishing.
Pressley, T. (2021). Factors contributing to teacher burnout during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 642304. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.642304
Prihatien, D., Suryana, A., & Kusnadi, E. (2023). Pengaruh beban administrasi guru terhadap efektivitas pengajaran pada sekolah dasar. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Indonesia, 15(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.23887/jmpi.v15i2.62345
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2022). Organizational behavior (19th ed.). Pearson Education.
Saloviita, T., & Pakarinen, E. (2021). Teacher workload and stress in inclusive classrooms. Education Sciences, 11(9), 560. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090560
Siswanto, D. H., Hanama, A., & Apriwulan, H. F. (2025). Teacher well-being and its influence on school effectiveness: A quantitative study. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.70376/jerp.v3i2.348
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Teacher stress and teacher self-efficacy as predictors of engagement, emotional exhaustion, and motivation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006
Sokal, L., Trudel, L. G. E., & Babb, J. (2020). Canadian teachers’ attitudes toward change, efficacy, and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, 100016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100016
Toropova, A., Myrberg, E., & Johansson, S. (2021). Teacher job satisfaction: The importance of school working conditions and teacher characteristics. International Journal of Educational Research, 107, 101518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101518
Wang, H., Hall, N. C., & Rahimi, S. (2015). Self-efficacy and causal attributions in teachers: Effects on burnout, job satisfaction, and well-being. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 120–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.01.005
Yin, H., Huang, S., & Lv, L. (2018). A multilevel analysis of job characteristics, emotion regulation, and teacher well-being. Teaching and Teacher Education, 76, 235–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.001
Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes and student outcomes: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ita Septia Indrawati, Garianto Garianto, Marzuki Noor
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with JSGP agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
