UJI EFEKTIVITAS FUNGISIDA KIMIA TERHADAP JAMUR PATOGEN Fusarium sp. SECARA IN VITRO

Authors

  • Cleoraissa Insyira Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Bayo Alhusaeri Siregar R&D PT. Arara Abadi
  • Moralita Chatri Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30605/biogenerasi.v11i1.8001

Keywords:

Fusarium sp, chemical fungicide, in vitro, Acacia crassicarpa

Abstract

Fusarium sp. is a pathogenic fungus causing wilt disease in Acacia crassicarpa nurseries and reducing seedling quality in industrial forest plantations. The control of this disease is generally done with chemical (synthetic) fungicides, but the most effective one is not yet known. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of several chemical fungicides against Fusarium sp. growth in vitro. The study was conducted from February to June 2025 at the Plant Protection Department (PPD) Laboratory, R&D Division of PT. Arara Abadi using a Completely Randomized Design with four treatments: control, Octave (prochloraz–manganese chloride complex), Besromil (metalaxyl), and Odeon (chlorothalonil), with three replications. The observed parameter was the percentage of fungal growth inhibition. Data were analyzed using ANOVA followed by Duncan’s test at a 5% significance level. The results showed that Octave exhibited the highest inhibitory effect with 100% inhibition and was significantly different from other treatments. Besromil and Odeon showed low inhibition and were not significantly different from the control. Therefore, prochloraz–manganese chloride complex was the most effective fungicide in inhibiting Fusarium sp. growth in vitro.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Budiyanto. (2018). Pengendalian penyakit tanaman. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Chen, Q., Yuan, Y., Chen, G., Li, N., Li, X., Lan, Y., & Wang, H. (2024). Evaluating two fungicides, prochloraz–manganese chloride complex and sebocotylamine acetate, to control cobweb disease in white button mushroom caused by Cladobotryum mycophilum. Journal of Fungi, 10(10), Article 676.

El-Saman, R. M. A., Emara, A. R., Selim, N. M. M., & Ibrahim, H. M. (2023). Study of chemical stability for chlorothalonil and their fungicidal effect against Fusarium solani and Botrytis cinerea. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences.

Kurniati, E., Zul, D. & Tjahyono, B. (2020). Isolasi Dan Identifikasi Jamur Terbawa Benih Acacia crassicarpa A. Cunn. Ex Benth. JUATIKA (Jurnal Agronomi Tanaman Tropika), 2(1): 19–30.

Lihyati, Wihdatun., Sopialena. (2022). PENGELOLAAN TERPADU PATOGEN JAMUR TUMBUHAN. Deepublish.

Miguel, T. de Á., Bordini, J. G., Saito, G. H., Andrade, C. G. T. de J., Ono, M. A., Hirooka, E. Y., Vizoni, É., & Ono, E. Y. S. (2015). Effect of fungicide on Fusarium verticillioides mycelial morphology and fumonisin B₁ production. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 46(1), 293–299.

Oktavia, U., Elfina, Y. & Yoza, D. (2017). 1 1. Mahasiswa Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Riau 2. Dosen Fakultas Pertanian. JOM Faperta, 4(1).

Pánek, M., Ali, A., & Helmer, Š. (2022). Use of metalaxyl against some soil plant pathogens of the class Peronosporomycetes: A review and two case studies. Plant Protection Science, 58(2), 92–109. https://doi.org/10.17221/42/2021-PPS

Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2021 tentang Penyelenggaraan Kehutanan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2021 Nomor 33. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/161853/pp-no-23-tahun-2021

Santoso, S. E., Soesanto, L. dan Haryanto, T. A. D. (2007). Penekanan Hayati Penyakit Moler Pada Bawang Merah dengan Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma koningii, dan Pseudomonas fluorescens P60. Jurnal HPT Tropika. Vol. 7(1): 53-61.

Sugesty, S., kardiansyah, T. & Pratiwi, W. (2015). Potensi Acacia crassicarpa sebagai bahan baku PulP kertas untuk hutan tanaman industri. Jurnal Selulosa, 5(1): 21–32.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-25

How to Cite

Insyira, C., Alhusaeri Siregar, B., & Chatri, M. (2026). UJI EFEKTIVITAS FUNGISIDA KIMIA TERHADAP JAMUR PATOGEN Fusarium sp. SECARA IN VITRO. Jurnal Biogenerasi, 11(1), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.30605/biogenerasi.v11i1.8001