Hubungan Kemampuan Representasi Visual Dan Pengetahuan Faktual Mahasiswa Pada Materi Anatomi Tumbuhan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30605/biogenerasi.v10i3.7047Keywords:
Anatomy plant, Factual Knowledge, Visual representationAbstract
During practical work, students tend to have difficulty describing the objects they are observing. This research aims to analyze the relationship between visual representation and students' factual knowledge on plant anatomy material. This type of research is descriptive correlational. The sample in this study included 33 students from a biology education study program at one of the universities in Bandung. The instruments used in this research include image analysis rubrics and tests. The image analysis rubric instrument is used to obtain data related to image representation abilities, while the test instrument is used to obtain data on students' factual knowledge. Before the correlation test is carried out, a prerequisite test is carried out first to obtain normal distribution results and linear regression. Based on the results of the correlation test, results were obtained with a significance of 0.031 < 0.05. Based on these results it can be concluded that there is a relationship between the two variables, namely between visual representation and factual knowledge. Furthermore, an r value of 0.377 was obtained, indicating that the relationship between visual representation and students' factual knowledge was categorized as low
Downloads
References
Ahmadi, W. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. Skripsi. Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo : Tidak diterbitkan.
Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl, D.R. (2010). Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen. Terjemahan oleh Agung Prihantoro. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Cheng, M. & Gilbert, J. (2015). Students’ Visualization Of Diagrams Representing The Human Circulatory System: The Use Of Spatial Isomorphism And Representational Conventions. International Journal of Science Education, 37 (1), 136-161.
Diana, S. (2014). Pemberdayaan Asisten Praktikum Untuk Pelaksanaan Peer Assisted Learning (PAL). Disertasi. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Tidak diterbitkan.
Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: A drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essay, 5 (2), 235-247.
Duda, H.J. (2010). Pembelajaran berbasis praktikum dan asesmennya pada sistem ekskresi untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa kelas XI. Vox Edukasi. 1 (2): 29-39.
Goldin, G.A. (1998). Representational system, learning, and problem solving. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 17 (2): 137-165.
Hasan, M. I. (2012). Pokok-Pokok Materi Statistik 1 (Statistik Deskriptif). Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Irvani, A. I. (2019). Korelasi Minat Terhadap Fisika dengan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA Pada Domain Pengetahuan Faktual dan Konseptual. Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Garut, 13 (1): 115-120.
Isfiani, I. R. (2014). Analisis hubungan antara habits of mind, tingkat kecemasan kognitif, dan hasil belajar biologi pada siswa kelas XI dan XII di SMA Kota Bandung. Tesis. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Tidak diterbitkan.
Natonis, S. F. M., Daniel, F., & Gella, N. J. M. (2022). Analisis Representasi Matematis Siswa Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(2), 3025–3033.
Nuraeni, E. (2016). Program Perkuliahan Anatomi Tumbuhan Berbasis Kerangka Instruksional Dimensi Belajar Marzano untuk Mengembangkan Literasi Kuantitatif Mahasiswa. Disertasi. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia: Tidak diterbitkan.
Prain, V. & Waldrip, B. (2008). A study of teachers’ perspectives about using multimodal representations of concepts to enhance science learning. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 8 (1), 5-24.
Purwanto, M.N. (2009). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: T. Remaja Rosdakarnya.
Puspandari, I., Praja, E.S., & Muhtarulloh, F. (2019). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Dengan Pendekatan Induktif Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa SMP,‖ Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8 (2) :307–18, https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v8i2.460.
Roth, W.-M, & Pozzer-Ardenghi, L. (2013). Pictures in Education. In Tsui, C. & Treagust, D. F. (Ed.), Multiple Representations in Biological Education : 3-18. Springer, London.
Rustaman, N. Y. (2011). Perjalanan Sebuah Pembaharuan Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Hands-On dan Minds-On dalam Pendidikan Sains. Bandung: UPI.
Saptono et al. (2013). Model Integrasi Atribut Asesmen Formatif (IAAF) Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Sel Untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Penalaran Dan Berpikir Analitik Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 2, (1), 31-40.
Savinainen, A., Makyen, A., Nieminen, P., & Viiri, J. (2015). The effect of using a visual representation tool in a teaching-learning sequence for teaching newton’s third law. Research Science Education, (1): 1-17.
Scharfenberg, F. J. dan Bogner, F.X. (2011). Teaching gene technology in an outreach lab : Students' assigned cognitive load clusters and the clusters' relationships to learner characteristics, laboratory variables, and cognitive achievement. Research in Science Education, 43 (1), 141-161.
Suningsih, A., Istiani, A., Ahmad, J. K., Pringsewu, D., & Id;, A. S. A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematis Siswa. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 225–234.
Suswati, L., Subhan, M., & Hermansyah, H. (2022). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Berbasis Problem Based Learning Untuk Pemahaman Konsep Fisika Pembelajar Siswa Kelas X SMK. Gravity Edu: Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran Fisika, 5(2), 22-25.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Nur Hidayah, Nukhbatul Bidayati Haka, Akbar Handoko, Laila Puspita, Ayu Reza Ningrum, Yani Suryani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.