Application of The Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) and Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (Dematel) Methods for E-Wallet Selection

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v9i3.9619

Keywords:

E-wallet, Decision Support System, Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC), Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL)

Abstract

The rapid growth of digital transactions in Indonesia has increased e-wallet adoption; Bank Indonesia recorded a 34.62% rise in electronic money transaction value to Rp2,503.96 trillion in 2024 (GoodStats, 2025). However, differences among e-wallet services in security, transaction cost, ease of use, promotions, and additional features make e-wallet selection a multi-criteria decision problem that is not always easy for users, so an appropriate decision-making method is needed. This study applies the Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) and Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) methods to e-wallet selection, comparing MABAC's capability to rank alternatives against DEMATEL's capability to analyze the relationships and influence levels among selection criteria. Data were collected through questionnaires distributed to e-wallet users, covering seven alternatives (Dana, GoPay, OVO, LinkAja, ShopeePay, Sakuku, and iSaku) evaluated against six criteria (usage rate, security, transaction fees, ease of use, promotions, and additional features). The MABAC results show that GoPay ranked first with a score of 0.679, followed by Dana (0.591) and ShopeePay (0.113), while the DEMATEL results indicate that security, transaction cost, and ease of use are the most influential criteria in e-wallet selection. These findings show that MABAC is effective for ranking alternatives, whereas DEMATEL is effective for analyzing inter-criteria relationships, so combining both methods provides more comprehensive support for e-wallet selection decisions.

References

Ahmad, I., Fatmayati, F., Sinlae, A. A. J., Sudipa, I. G. I., Alamsyah, D., Arisantoso, Muharrom, M., Ida Bagus Gede Sarasvananda, Anak Agung Gde Bagus Ariana, R. N., & Akmaludin. (2023). Multi-Attribute Decision Making Methods in Decision Support Systems.

Anriani, A., Astuti, I. F., & Agus, F. (2024). Rubber Latex Quality Determination Model Using the Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) Method. IKRA-ITH Informatika: Journal of Computer Science and Informatics, 8(2), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.37817/ikraith-informatika.v8i2.2954

Febri, B., Sopian, T., Studi, P., Teknologi, M., Selatan, S., & Keputusan, S. P. (2021). Application of the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method in a Decision Support System for Selecting Internet Service Packages. April, 502–512.

GoodStats. (2025). Nilai Transaksi Uang Elektronik Sepanjang 2024 Capai Rp2,5 Kuadriliun. https://goodstats.id/article/nilai-transaksi-uang-elektronik-sepanjang-2024-capai-rp2-5-kuadriliun-iFpMa

Hidayat, A., Siregar, D., & Handoko, D. (2023). Application of the MABAC Method in Determining Best-Selling Coffee Based on Price Level at Kopi Kenangan Company. Algoritma: Journal of Computer Science and Informatics, 7(1), 64–76. https://doi.org/10.30829/algoritma.v7i1.15368

Laila, F., & Hasibuan, N. A. (2021). Permanent Employee Recruitment Selection Applying the Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison Method. Journal of Informatics Management and Information Technology, 1(1), 5–12. https://hostjournals.com/

Nguyen, P. V. (2023). An Integrated and Comprehensive Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Model for Electronic Wallet Selection. Computers, Materials & Continua, 74(1), 2279–2301. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2023.030019

Pamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015). The Selection of Transport and Handling Resources in Logistics Centers Using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016–3028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057

Rhamadan, R. F., Suhendar, E., Prasasty, A. T., Industri, P. T., Teknik, F., Ilmu, D., & Pgri, U. I. (2022). Sugiyono. (2020). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methodology.

Suyanto. (2023). Getting to Know Digital Wallets in Indonesia.

Trisnawati, Y. (2021). Analysis of DANA E-Wallet User Acceptance Using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Muslim Daily Religiosity Assessment Scale. Repository.Uinjkt.Ac.Id. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/65294

Turban, E. (2011). Decision support and business intelligence systems. Pearson Education India.

Widiyanti, W. (2020). The Effect of Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Promotion on the Decision to Use the OVO E-Wallet in Depok. Moneter - Journal of Accounting and Finance, 7(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.31294/moneter.v7i1.7567

Downloads

Published

2026-08-29

How to Cite

Application of The Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC) and Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (Dematel) Methods for E-Wallet Selection. (2026). Proximal: Jurnal Penelitian Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3), 749-762. https://doi.org/10.30605/proximal.v9i3.9619