Kemampuan Literasi Membaca Mahasiswa PGSD dalam Menginterpretasi Wacana Ilmiah
DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/gwjqpe20
literasi membaca, wacana ilmiah, membaca akademik, mahasiswa PGSD, interpretasi
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan kemampuan literasi membaca mahasiswa PGSD semester IV dalam menginterpretasi wacana ilmiah. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif deskriptif dengan partisipan 74 mahasiswa PGSD Universitas Muhammadiyah Gorontalo yang dipilih melalui total sampling. Data utama diperoleh melalui tes literasi membaca berbasis wacana ilmiah yang mencakup lima indikator: menemukan informasi eksplisit, memahami isi bacaan, menginterpretasi makna, menganalisis hubungan antargagasan, dan menarik simpulan. Data motivasi membaca dikumpulkan melalui angket sebagai informasi pendukung deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 39 mahasiswa (52,7%) berada pada kategori rendah, 26 mahasiswa (35,1%) kategori sedang, dan 9 mahasiswa (12,2%) kategori tinggi. Capaian tertinggi terdapat pada indikator menemukan informasi eksplisit (64,15%), sedangkan capaian terendah terdapat pada indikator menarik simpulan (48,51%). Rata-rata capaian indikator sebesar 55,25% menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan mahasiswa masih dominan pada level literal dan belum optimal pada level inferensial-analitis. Data pendukung menunjukkan 49 mahasiswa (66,2%) memiliki motivasi membaca rendah. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penguatan literasi akademik mahasiswa PGSD perlu diarahkan pada pembacaan interpretatif, analitis, penyimpulan, dan strategi metakognitif agar mahasiswa lebih siap memahami teks ilmiah dan menjalankan peran profesional sebagai calon guru sekolah dasar.
Downloads
References
Afdal, H. W., Spernes, K., & Hoff-Jenssen, R. (2023). Academic reading as a social practice in higher education. Higher Education, 85(6), 1337–1355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00893-x
Ashour, M., Minato, E., Alawadhi, A., Berrahmoune, S., Simard-Tremblay, E., Poulin, C., & Myers, K. A. (2022). Diagnostic utility of specific abnormal EEG patterns in children for determining epilepsy phenotype and presence of structural brain abnormalities. Heliyon, 8(8), e10172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10172
Baker, S., Bangeni, B., Burke, R., & Hunma, A. (2019). The invisibility of academic reading as social practice and its implications for equity in higher education: a scoping study. Higher Education Research & Development, 38(1), 142–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1540554
Banat, S. M., & Pierewan, A. C. (2019). READING LITERACY AND METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY FOR PREDICTING ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. LITERA, 18(3), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v18i3.24806
Bernardo, A. B. I., & Mante-Estacio, M. J. (2023). Metacognitive reading strategies and its relationship with Filipino high school students’ reading proficiency: insights from the PISA 2018 data. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 400. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01886-6
Creswell, J. W. ., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dangin, D. (2020). Students’ Awareness of Metacognitive Reading Strategies in Academic Reading. Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues, 3(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.21043/jetli.v3i1.7145
de-la-Peña, C., & Luque-Rojas, M. J. (2021). Levels of Reading Comprehension in Higher Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.712901
Eriksson, L. (2023). “Gruelling to read”: Swedish university students’ perceptions of and attitudes towards academic reading in English. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 64, 101265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101265
Fauzi, C., & Ashadi, A. (2019). An Analysis on Reading Strategies based on Metacognitive Awareness and Gender. Lingua Pedagogia, Journal of English Teaching Studies, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.21831/lingped.v1i1.23912
Krismadayanti, A., & Zainil, Y. (2022). THE LEVEL OF THE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ANALYZED BY USING BARRETT TAXONOMY. Journal of Cultura and Lingua, 3(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.37301/culingua.v3i1.110
Li, H., & Gan, Z. (2022). Reading motivation, self-regulated reading strategies and English vocabulary knowledge: Which most predicted students’ English reading comprehension? Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041870
Mulyawan, R., Guntur, G., & Rismayanthi, C. (2022). LITERASI MEMBACA MAHASISWA OLAHRAGA. LITERA, 20(3), 502–516. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v20i3.43997
Nur, A., & Hidayatullah, S. (n.d.). Literasi Bahasa di Sekolah Dasar Berbasis Video Ghibli Animation. PEDAGOGIKA, 16, 2025–2121.
Nur Syarif Hidayatullah, A., Muhammadiyah Gorontalo, U., Negeri Gorontalo, U., Mansoer Pateda, J. H., Telaga Biru, K., & Gorontalo, K. (2024). PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NATURE BASED LEARNING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MENULIS TEKS DESKRIPSI. JPSS: Jurnal Pendidikan Sang Surya, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.56959
Nurbaya, S., Rahman, F., Rustono, R., & Subyantoro, S. (2018). PENGARUH SKEMATA TERHADAP KOMPETENSI MEMBACA PEMAHAMAN BERBASIS TAKSONOMI RUDDELL. LITERA, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v17i1.18785
Park, Y., & Derakhshan, A. (2026). From Gutenberg to the classroom: large-scale generation and validation of vocabulary-controlled EFL reading materials. Language Testing in Asia, 16(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-026-00429-5
Prawira, N. N. P., Artini, L. P., Marsakawati, N. P. E., Padmadewi, N. N., Ratminingsih, N. M., & Utami, I. G. A. L. P. (2023). The Implementation of Literacy Activities in Primary School. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 150–156. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v7i1.56108
Putro, N. H. P. S. (2022). Profiles of undergraduate students reading attitude. LITERA, 21(1), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v21i1.47909
Sari, E. S., & Pujiono, S. (2017). BUDAYA LITERASI DI KALANGAN MAHASISWA FBS UNY. LITERA, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v16i1.14254
Wang, L., Luo, G., Yang, J., Zhang, W., Yang, P., Sun, B., Liang, Z., & Wang, D. (2026). A reading model of English as a foreign language accommodated by programming-oriented computational thinking: An interdisciplinary approach. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 61, 102162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102162
Warnby, M. (2025). Relating academic reading with academic vocabulary and general English proficiency to assess standards of students’ university-preparedness – the case of IELTS and CEFR B2. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 69(3), 506–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2024.2318434
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andi Nur Syarif Hidayatullah, Samid Saripi, Nurfadliah Nurfadliah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
