Indonesian EFL Students' Perspective on Free4Talk: A Novice vs. Expert User Study
https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i3.6844
Keywords:
Free4Talk, EFL students, speaking skills, novice vs. expert usersAbstract
This study investigates the perceptions of final-year English major students toward the Free4Talk platform by comparing novice and expert users. A total of 15 participants were purposively selected from a public university in North Sumatra, Indonesia, comprising 12 novice users (with less than three months of experience) and 3 expert users (with more than one year of experience). Adopting a qualitative descriptive-comparative design, data were collected through questionnaires from all participants and interviews with eight volunteers. Thematic analysis was applied to interpret the data. Findings reveal that both groups perceived Free4Talk positively, particularly for its accessibility, discussion rooms, and opportunities for authentic speaking practice. Novice users frequently encountered initial anxiety, challenges in comprehending various accents, and inconsistent motivation, whereas expert users exhibited greater confidence, consistent engagement, and long-term motivation. Both groups shared common challenges related to technical issues and limited content moderation. The study highlights that user experience, affective readiness, and prior familiarity with the platform significantly impact engagement, confidence, and speaking development, offering practical insights for online speaking platforms and English language instruction.
Downloads
References
Alifah. (2021). Difficulties in understanding diverse accents and constructing accurate responses in EFL learning. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 45–56.
Apandi, N. M., Rahmat, N. H., Aziz, A. A., & Hamat, A. (2022). Language learners’ perceptions towards online speaking platform Free4Talk: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 10(3), 45–56.
Bahar, I., & Dalimunte, A. M. (2025). The impact of Free4Talk on university students' speaking fluency and grammar accuracy. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations, 7(1), 34–47.
Borg, S. (2009). Language teacher cognition. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 163–171). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139042710.022
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Dumas, J. S., & Redish, J. C. (1999). A practical guide to usability testing. Exeter, England: Intellect Books.
Essabari, S., & Hiba, B. (2025). Democratizing the EFL classroom: The impact of a negotiated syllabus on student voice and critical engagement. Curriculum Perspectives. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-025-00303-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-025-00303-z
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Farhani, N., Putri, A., & Rahman, T. (2020). Challenges in developing English speaking proficiency among Indonesian students. Indonesian Journal of Language Education, 8(2), 112–125.
Gelen, I., & Tozluoglu, E. (2021). Using Free4Talk as a language exchange platform: Motivations and benefits. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 9(2), 102–111.
Hamdi, S. (2023). Critical language awareness in EFL curriculum: A pathway to global engagement. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 12(4), 22–29.
Handayani, S. (2024). Impact of consistent engagement with HelloTalk on EFL learners. Journal of Digital Education and Communication, 6(1), 58–70.
Hasibuan, M., & Rahman Hz, B. I. (2025). The use of English Central application to improve students' speaking skill. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Sastra, 11(3), 3699–3714.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia. (2013). Kurikulum 2013: Kompetensi dasar Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jakarta, Indonesia: Kemendikbud.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Salhy, A., & Darir, H. (2024). English as a global language: A necessity for academic and career success. Journal of Global Language Education, 11(1), 1–12.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
Saputri, R. A., & Fuady, A. (2023). User engagement and content-sharing behavior on Free4Talk: The role of enjoyment and media appeal. Journal of Digital Language Learning, 5(2), 67–78.
Sarmento, J. A. (2024). Challenges of EFL learners in non-native environments: A case study. Global Journal of Language Teaching, 8(1), 88–101.
Silverman, D. (2011). Interpreting qualitative data (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sukardi. (2013). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan: Kompetensi dan praktiknya. Jakarta, Indonesia: Bumi Aksara.
Tao, Y. (2021). Anonymous platforms and reduced social anxiety in language learning. Journal of Language and Technology in Education, 4(2), 21–33.
Tobing, R. A., & Damanik, I. (2025). Building EFL learners’ speaking confidence through Free4Talk: Student perceptions and outcomes. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 9(1), 55–69.
Tresna, A. R., & Handayani, D. (2024). Student engagement in real-time speaking practice using Free4Talk: Benefits and challenges. ELT Perspective, 12(2), 123–135.
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds. & Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Cansa Namira Sitanggang, Maslathif Dwi Purnomo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
