An Analysis Of Teachers’ Strategies In Teaching Reading Comprehension In Junior High School
https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i2.3586
Keywords:
Analysis, Junior High School, Reading Comprehension, Tanjungbalai, Teacher Strategy.Abstract
The goal of this study is to identify the strategies and methods used by English teachers at junior high schools in Tanjungbalai to teach reading comprehension. This research is a combination of qualitative and quantitative research (mixed methods). Data collection techniques in this study include surveys (questionnaires), interviews, and observations. The sample for this study consisted of 10 survey and interview participants. In the implementation of the survey/questionnaire, the researcher gave questionnaires to 10 survey participants, consisting of English teachers who taught reading comprehension materials in grades 7-9. The result of this study shows that English teachers in junior high schools in Tanjungbalai apply several strategies to teaching reading comprehension in class, namely directed reading activity (DRA), reading aloud in class, and no strategy (collecting vocabulary or difficult vocabulary).
Downloads
References
Abdussamad, Z. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Makassar : Syakir Media Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/juwxn
Adler, C.R. (2001). Put Reading First: The Research Building Blocks of Reading Instruction. Kindergarten Through Grade 3, Second Edition. The National Institute for Literacy.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman.
Armbruster, B.B., Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2001). Put reading first: The research building blocks for teaching children to read. Jessup, MD: National institute for Literacy
Audina, Y. et.al. (2020). An Analysis of Teacher’s Strategies in Teaching Reading Comprehension. https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v11i1.3689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v11i1.3689
Betts. 2012. DRA (Directed Reading Activity), retrieved on May 23, 2012, <http://www.nea.org/tools/DRA-directed-reading-activity.html>
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (2017). Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theories and Methods (6th ed.). Pearson
Suparman, N. F. N. (2018). Glotokronologi Bahasa Rampi Dan Bahasa Wotu Glotocronology Language Rampi And Wotu Languages. Telaga Bahasa, 6(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.36843/tb.v6i1.15
Braskamp, L. A., & Ory, J. C. (1994). Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective Faculty Evaluation: Enhancing Teaching and Determining Faculty Effectiveness. Jossey-Bass.
Cleveland, L. M., Olimpo, J. T., & DeChenne-Peters, S. E. (2017). Investigating The Relationship between Instructors’ Use of Active-learning Strategies and Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Affective Changes in Introductory Biology: A Comparison of Two Active-Learning Environments. CBE—Life Sciences Education, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-06-0181
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications
Dwiningtiyas, G. N., Sofyan, D., & Puspita, H. (2020). Teachers’ Strategies in Teaching Reading Comprehension. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy), 4 (2). https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v4i2.3682
Fox, E., & Alexander, P. A. (2009). Text comprehension: A retrospective, perspective, and prospective. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 227–239). New York, NY: Routledge.
Graesser, A. C. (2007). An introduction to strategic reading comprehension. In D. S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 3–26). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Hasan, M. S. R, & Chumaidah, N. (2020). Strategi Pembelajaran PAI Anti Radikalisme di SMP Negeri 1 Ngoro Jombang. Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 6(1), 36–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35309/alinsyiroh.v6i1.3815
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The Diference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. EDUCAUSE Review, 27. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-diference-between-emergency-remote-teaching and-online-learning.
Jovanović, J., Gašević, D., Dawson, S., Pardo, A., & Mirriahi, N. (2017). Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 33(4), 74–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.02.001
Karwono and Muzni, A. I. (2020). Strategi Pembelajaran dalam Profesi Keguruan. Depok. PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
LESGOLD, A. M., & PERFETTI, C. A. Interactive processes in reading comprehension. Discourse Processes, 1978, 1, 323-336. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01638537809544443
Majid, Abdul. (2017). Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung. PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
McNamara DS, & Magliano J (2009). Toward a comprehensive model for comprehension. In Ross B (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 297–384). New York, NY: Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(09)51009-2
McVee, M. B., Dunsmore, K., & Gavelek, J. R. (2005). Schema theory revisited. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 531–566. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075004531 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075004531
Nur HS, A. O., Salija, H., & Munir. (2023). Teachers’ Strategies in Teaching Reading Comprehension to the Second-Grade Students of Senior High School. Journal of Excellence in English Language Education Volume 2 No. 1 (2023).
Pearson, P.D. & Raphael, T. 1990.Reading Comprehension as a Dimension of Thinking. In B.F. Jones &L.I. Idol (Eds.). Dimensions of Thinking and Cognitive Instruction: Implications for Reform, Vol.I. Hillsdale: Erlbaum, 209-240.
Ragin, G, Refando, A, & Utami, D. C. (2020). Implementasi Strategi Pembelajaran Ekspositori untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika di Sekolah Dasar. PANDAWA, 5(1), 54–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31332/dy.v1i1.1819
Rosari, I. (2019). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran dan Gaya Kognitif Spasial terhadap Hasil Belajar Ikatan Kimia SMA. IJIS Edu: Indonesian Journal of Integrated Science Education, 1(2), 163–168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v1i2.1966
Ruddell, R. B.& Unrau, N. J. (2013). Reading as a Motivated Meaning-Construction Process: The reader, the Text, and the Teacher. In D. E. Alvermann, N. K. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.) Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (6th Ed.) (pp. 1015-1068). Newark: International Reading Association. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1598/0710.38
Sajjad, S. (2010). Effective teaching methods at higher education level. Pakistan Journal of Special Education, 11, 29–43.
Sanjaya, Wina. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta Prenada Media.
Santosa, D. S. S, Sampaleng, D, & Amtiran, A. (2020). Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran SIKIP. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Kristen, 1(1), 11–24 DOI: https://doi.org/10.52220/sikip.v1i1.34
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Ulfa, A. A., Jabu, Baso., & Ariyani, A. (2023). AN ANALYSIS OF TEACHERS’ STRATEGIES IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION. Journal of Technology in Language Pedagogy (JTechLP) Vol. 2, No. 3, (2023), p. 549 – 559.
Wibowo, W. et.al. (2020). An Analysis of English Teachers’ Strategies in Teaching Reading Comprehension. JALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy) Vol. 4 No. 1, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25157/jall.v4i2.3682
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
