Comparing Malangan And Mataraman Javanese Dialect: A Case Study in The Border Area of Malang And Blitar
Abstract
This study aims to observe differences in the Javanese dialect of Malangan and Mataraman and the factors that influence the phenomenon, as both dialects are spoken in the border region of Malang and Blitar. The method used in this research is qualitative, which is to provide a general description of a situation as clearly as possible without any treatment of the object under study. This research is a sociolinguistic study based on the language phenomenon that occurs in the community in the cultural border area of a language, especially regarding the form of dialect differences that occur. The results suggest that the differences lie in the description markers in Ngoko Javanese. Such phenomenon is observed based on various words spoken in various situations in both regions. In addition, despite the differences of the description markers between the two dialects, the meanings behind them are not significantly different. As for the factors that make the differences between the Malangan and Mataraman dialect spoken in the Malang and Blitar border areas, they are divided into four: speakers’ habits, self-identity, region/geography, and feeling of having a different dialect/language.
Downloads
References
Burridge, K., & Stebbins, T. N. (2015). For the Love of Language: An Introduction to Linguistics. Cambridge University. https://books.google.com.
Chaer, Abdul. 2003. Linguistik Umum. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta
Chaer, Abdul dan Leonie Agustina. (2010). Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan Awal.
Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Fishman, JA. (1972). Readings in the Sociology of Language. Giglio: Mouton & C.o.
Kesuma, Tri Mastoyo Jati Kesuma. (2007). Pengantar (Metode) Penelitian Bahasa. Yogyakarta. Carasvatibooks
Latif, Saiful. (2016). Pengaruh Mobilitas Sosial terhadap Perubahan Bahasa. EDUKASI - Jurnal Pendidikan, Vol. 14 No.1 Januari.
Mahsun. (2005). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jakarta: Raja Grasindo.
Moleong, Lexi J. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja
Rosdakarya.
Mardikantoro, Hari Bakti. (2012). Pilihan Bahasa Masyarakat Samin dalam Ranah Keluarga. Jurnal Humaniora vol. 24, nomor 3, edisi Oktober, hal. 345-357.
Pangaribuan, Tangson R. (2011). Hubungan Variasi Bahasa Dengan Kelompok Sosial Dan Pemakaian Bahasa. Jurnal Bahasa Unimed. https://www.neliti.com/publications/78731/hubungan-variasi-bahasa-dengan-kelompok-sosial-dan-pemakaian-bahasa.
Rizkiansyah, Rio Anugrah dan Rustono. (2017). Perilaku Berbahasa Pengembang Perumahan, Pengelola Hotel, dan Pengelola Toko. SELOKA 6 (1): Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka
Rusmawati, Roosi dan Khasanah, Ismatul. (2020). Penelitian Hibah Doktor: Pemertahanan Bahasa Jawa pada Masyarakat Tapal Batas: Kajian Sosiolinguistik di Wilayah Perbatasan Kabupaten Blitar dan Malang. Malang: BPPM FIB Universitas Brawijaya.
Sina, Peter Garlans. (2020). Ekonomi Rumah Tangga di Era Pandemi Covid-19. Journal of Management (SME’s) vol. 12, no.2, 2020, p239-254
Subana, M. (2001). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Ilmiah. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Subroto, Edi. (2006). Liku-liku Verba Berafiks /a/ dalam Bahasa Jawa Baku.
Surakarta: Cakra Books Solo.
Sumarsono dan Paina, Partana. (2004). Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Sabda
Sumarsono. (2011). Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Sabda.
_________. (2012). Sosiolinguistik. Yogyakarta: Sabda.
Sasangka, Sry Satriya Tjatur Wisnu. (2004). Unggah-ungguh Bahasa Jawa. Jakarta: Yayasan Paramalingua.
Susilowati, Ellya. (2020). Covid-19: Pandemi dalam Banyak Wajah (Peranan Keluarga Menghadapi Pandemi Covid-19 di Indonesia). Depok: Rajawali Press.
Zulaeha, Ida. (2010). Dialektologi Dialek Geografi & Dialek Sosial. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Yule, George. (2016). The Study of Language. 6th Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Copyright (c) 2023 Roosi Rusmawati, Ismatul Khasanah, Ismi Prihandari, Khilmi Mauliddian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
