Ambition and Self-Actualization of Modern Women in The Queen’s Gambit: A Hierarchy of Needs Perspective

Nadya Malika Putri; M. Suryadi; Ken Widyatwati; Annisa Rinjani

doi:10.30605/onoma.v11i4.7172

Ambition and Self-Actualization of Modern Women in The Queen’s Gambit: A Hierarchy of Needs Perspective

https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i4.7172

Authors

Nadya Malika Putri Diponegoro University
M. Suryadi Diponegoro University
Ken Widyatwati Diponegoro University
Annisa Rinjani Diponegoro University

Keywords:

ambition, hierarchy, self-actualization, The Queen’s Gambit, women

Abstract

This study examines the ambition of the main female character, Beth Harmon, in The Queen's Gambit series through Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs theory. This study analyzes how the main character's journey reflects the fulfillment of five levels of human needs: physiological, safety, love and belonging, esteem, and self-actualization. This study contributes to broadening the insight into modern women's ambitions through the representation of fictional characters in popular media. The method used is descriptive-qualitative with a character analysis and narrative approach. Data are analyzed based on the psychological development of the character and the social challenges she faces in the male-dominated chess world. Each level of need shows complex emotional and social dynamics. Beth successfully demonstrates perseverance, courage, and a competitive spirit that reflect women's ambition today in pursuing education and careers amidst gender challenges. This study found that modern women's ambitions relate to achievement and seeking identity and recognition in social and professional spaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amanda, N. Z. (2025). Bidak Ratu dalam Catur Patriarki: Analisis Psikoanalitik Feminis Terhadap The Queens Gambit (2020). Jurnal IMAJI, 16(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.52290/i.v16i1.257

Breda, T., Jouini, E., Napp, C., & Thebault, G. (2020). Gender Stereotypes Can Explain The Gender-Equality Paradox. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(49), 31063–31069. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008704117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008704117

Bridges, D., Wulff, E., & Bambrry, L. (2021). Resilience for Gender Inclusion: Developing a Model for Women in Male‐Dominated Occupations. Work and Organization, 30(1), 263–279. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gwao.12672 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12672

Dar, S. A., & Sakthivel, D. P. (2022). Maslow’s Hierarchyy of Needs is Still Relevant in the 21’s Century. Journal of Learning and Educational Policy, 2(5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55529/jlep25.1.9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.55529/jlep.23.1.9

Desmet, P., & Fokkinga, S. (2020). Beyond Maslow’s Pyramid: Introducing a Typologhy of Thirteen Fundamental Needs for Human-Centered Designed. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 38(4), 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/mti4030038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/mti4030038

Dewi, A. A. S. N., & Pratama, A. D. Y. (2023). The Analysis of Sexist Language in the Queen’s Gambit Drama Series. LINGUA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 20(1), 127–160. https://doi.org/10.30957/lingua.v20i1.815 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30957/lingua.v20i1.815

Frank, S. (2020). The Queen of Gambit. Netflix.

Giannetti, L. (2014). Understanding Movies. In Pearson Education, Inc.

Giligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice. Cambridge. https://archive.org/details/indifferentvoice0000unse/page/n5/mode/2up

Kaufman, S. B. (2023). Self-Actualizing People in the 21st Century: Integration with Contemporary Theory and Research on Personality and Well-Being. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 63(1), 51–83. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0022167818809187 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167818809187

Lect, A., & Abdulhasan, Z. (2024). A Marxist Feminist Study in Walter Tevis ’ The Queen ’ s Gambit. 24(February), 33–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0055/CGP/v24i01/33-55

Lung, D., Maru, M. G., & Rorimpandey, R. S. (2022). Ambition As Seen in Robert Louis Stevenson’S Themaster of Ballantrae: a Winter’S Tale. Kompetensi, 2(02), 1143–1153. https://doi.org/10.53682/kompetensi.v2i02.4742 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53682/kompetensi.v2i02.4742

Maslow, A. (1970). Motivation and Personality (2Har ed.). Harper and Row. https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.198216/mode/2up

Mustofa, A. Z. (2022). Hierarchy of Human Needs: A Humanistic Psychology Approach of Abraham Maslow. Kawanua International Journal of Multicultural Studies, 3(2), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.30984/kijms.v3i2.282 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30984/kijms.v3i2.282

Prasetyaningrum, D. A., & Ahdiani, U. (2024). The intersectionality of gender discrimination impact on Beth Harmon’s identity development in The Queen’s Gambit. NOTION: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Culture, 6(2), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v6i2.10522 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/notion.v6i2.10522

Rojas, M., Meendez, A., & Watkins-Fassler, K. (2023). The Hierarchy of Needs Empirical Examination of Maslow’s Theory and Lessons for Development. World Development, 165. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106185

Tabassum, N., & Nayak, B. S. (2021). Gender Stereotypes and Their Impact on Women’s Career Progressions from a Managerial Perspective. IIM Kozhikode Society and Management Review, 10(2), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975220975513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2277975220975513

Wolf, N. (1991). The Beauty Myth: How Images of Beauty are Used Againts Women. New York:W.Morrow. https://archive.org/details/beautymyth0000naom/mode/2up

Downloads

PDF BAHASA INGGRIS

Published

2025-11-15

How to Cite

Malika Putri, N., Suryadi, M., Widyatwati, K., & Rinjani, A. (2025). Ambition and Self-Actualization of Modern Women in The Queen’s Gambit: A Hierarchy of Needs Perspective . Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 11(4), 4683–4695. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i4.7172

Download Citation

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 4 (2025): Penulis dari 2 negara (Indonesia dan Turki)

Section

Articles

License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.