Teachers’ Perceptions towards the implementation of Neuro-Linguistics Programming (NLP) Techniques in Teaching Speaking at Indonesian Senior High School Context

https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i4.6924

Authors

  • Asia Masita Haidir Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Syarifuddin Dollah Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Muhammad Basri Universitas Negeri Makassar

Keywords:

Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP); teachers’ perceptions; speaking skills; EFL classroom ; Affective Barriers

Abstract

This study examines teachers’ perceptions of Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) in teaching speaking within Indonesian senior high schools. A qualitative design was employed, using purposive sampling to select three English teachers. Data were collected through interviews and analyzed thematically. The findings indicate that teachers held a clear understanding of NLP as an approach linking language, cognition, and behavior. They expressed positive attitudes toward its implementation, identifying techniques such as pacing, modeling, elicitation, visualization, anchoring, and reframing as effective in fostering interactive classrooms, lowering anxiety, and enhancing students’ confidence. Teachers also acknowledged challenges, particularly large class sizes, limited instructional time, and cultural factors that influenced classroom dynamics. The primary motivation for applying NLP was to overcome affective barriers such as low self-confidence and fear of mistakes considered more problematic than linguistic limitations. Overall, NLP was perceived to enrich speaking instruction by addressing both cognitive and affective aspects of learning. It provides a holistic framework that supports learner-centered, engaging, and confidence-building English speaking classrooms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Begum, A. J., Paulraj, I. J. M., & Banu, S. H. (2022). Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) as a Promising Technique of Communicative English Language. 5(3), 100–104. https://doi.org/10.36348/sijll.2022.v05i03.004

Brown, H. D. (2003). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. Longman.

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2013). Teaching thematic analysis. The Psychologist, 26(2), 120–123.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches(4th ed.). Sage Publications Inc.

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction (7th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.

Haidir, A. M. (2024, November). Neuro-Linguistic Programming As A Teaching Method To Improve Foreign Language Teaching In Indonesian Efl Classrooms. In Hybrid National Conference Proceeding (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 11-18).

Kurniasari, M. D., & Mbato, C. L. (2018). Indonesian Students’ Language Attitudes Towards Indonesian and English Through Education and Working Frame. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 21(7), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.2018.suppl2107

Muamaroh, & Prihartanti, N. (2013). Willingness To Communicate in English: a Case Study of Indonesian University Students. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 25(1), 71–81. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/bitstream/handle/11617/4564/6.pdf

Muamaroh, & Prihartanti, N. (2013). Willingness To Communicate in English: a Case Study of Indonesian University Students. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 25(1), 71–81. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/bitstream/handle/11617/4564/6.pdf

Muamaroh. (2013). Improving Indonesian University Students’ Spoken English Using Group Work and Cooperative Learning, 16,(4), 43-56. https://doi.org/10.25913/5ea1126a07706

Nety, Asti Wahyuni, N. (2020). Students ’ Self Confidence in Speaking English. English Education Journal (E2J), 6(1), 8–16.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Rahmawati, F. E., & Nuryono, W. (2014). The Application of Therapy NLP (Neuro Linguistic Programming) to Reduce Anxiety in Public Speaking in Front of Class XI Senior High School 2 Pare. BK Journal, 4(3), 675–682.

Rosemarin, S. (2016). Enhancing Creativity by Using NLP ( Neurological- Linguistic Programming ) and Guided Imagery. 4(9), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040931

Suparman, S., & Charmilasari, C. (2017). Analysis of Phase Structure Realization in Classroom Discourse: A Study of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 4(2), 120-126.

Rustan, E. (2022). Language Learning with Neurolinguistic Programming: An Integrative Review. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(6), 1251–1258. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1306.13

Vaezi, S., & Reza Shahroosvand, H. (2015). Iranian EFL Learners’ and Teachers’ Sensory Preferences and the Learners’ Speaking Ability. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v3i2.7627

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Harvard University Press.

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Published

2025-09-10

How to Cite

Asia Masita Haidir, Syarifuddin Dollah, & Muhammad Basri. (2025). Teachers’ Perceptions towards the implementation of Neuro-Linguistics Programming (NLP) Techniques in Teaching Speaking at Indonesian Senior High School Context. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 11(4), 3904–3913. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i4.6924

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories