Vocabulary Mastery Is Not Everything: The Impact of Reading Habits on Popular Scientific Article Writing Skills
https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i4.6911
Keywords:
Vocabulary Mastery, Writing Skills, PPopular Scientific Articles, Reading Habits, Data Visualization, Junior High SchoolAbstract
Popular scientific articles require not only linguistic accuracy but also the ability to adapt style and structure for a broad audience. This study examines the association between vocabulary mastery and the quality of popular scientific article writing, and describes learner profiles related to reading exposure to popular science texts among junior high school students. Using a quantitative correlational design, data were collected from one Grade VIII class at SMP Negeri 5 Cilacap (AY 2024/2025) selected through purposive sampling. Instruments included a multiple-choice vocabulary test and a writing task assessed with an analytic rubric covering Creativity & Engagement, Structure & Organization, and Vocabulary & Sentence Variety. Because one variable was non-normally distributed, Spearman’s rho was applied, complemented by scatter/box-plot visualizations and quadrant mapping to profile outliers and compensation patterns. Results showed a weak, positive, and non-significant correlation between vocabulary mastery and writing quality (ρ = 0.233; p = 0.199). Visualization revealed heterogeneous profiles: some students with limited vocabulary achieved adequate writing through organization and rhetorical strategies (Low-High quadrant), while some with higher vocabulary underperformed when structure and audience adaptation were weak (High-Low quadrant). Groups with higher reading exposure to popular science tended to obtain consistently higher rubric scores. For that, vocabulary supports writing, but it is not a sufficient determinant of success in popular science writing. Instruction should integrate vocabulary development, regular reading of popular science texts, and explicit teaching of rhetorical organization and audience adaptation.
Downloads
References
Aaron, D. (2001). Biblical ambiguities: metaphor, semantics, and divine imagery. In The Brill Reference Library of Judaism. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=_UTq6dfDZJYC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=Biblical+Ambiguities:+Metaphor,+Semantics+and+Divine+Imagery&ots=XNHrpZCUsq&sig=4-X1pVRUS81ZqRMF3UzXKNeRUtY%5Cnhttp://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=_UTq6dfDZJYC&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&d
Arsyad, S., Purwo, B. K., Adnan, Z., & Maisarah, I. (2020). Panduan Menembus Jurnal Internasional. Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya. http://library1.nida.ac.th/termpaper6/sd/2554/19755.pdf
Asadi, M., Ebadi, S., & Mohammadi, L. (2025). The impact of integrating ChatGPT with teachers’ feedback on EFL writing skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101766
Başar, M., & Batur, Z. (2025). The Effect of Writing Operation Scenarios on Higher-Order Thinking Skills. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education , 17(3), 353–366. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2025.384
Buterbaugh, A. (2025). Strengthening the Multiple-Choice Assessment: Improving Item-Writing Skills of Physician Assistant Educators. Journal of Physician Assistant Education, 36(1), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/JPA.0000000000000636
Calderón, M., & Soto, I. (2018). Academic Language Mastery: Vocabulary in Context. In Academic Language Mastery: Vocabulary in Context. Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506338293
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Fahnestock, J. (2011). Rhetorical style: The uses of language in persuasion. OUP USA.
Graham, S., Liu, X., Aitken, A., Ng, C., Bartlett, B., Harris, K. R., & Holzapfel, J. (2018). Effectiveness of Literacy Programs Balancing Reading and Writing Instruction: A Meta-Analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.194
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A Meta-Analysis of Writing Instruction for Adolescent Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 445–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445
Gusfitri, M., & Delfia, E. (2018). Bahasa Indonesia Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Keperawatan Malang, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.36916/jkm.v1i1.45
Jiang, X., & Cohen, A. D. (2018). Learner strategies for dealing with pronunciation issues in Mandarin. System, 76(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.04.012
Kittle, N., & McCarthy, V. (2015). Teaching Corner: Raising the Bar: Ethical Considerations of Medical Student Preparation for Short-Term Immersion Experiences. In Journal of Bioethical Inquiry. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84928239026&doi=10.1007%2Fs11673-014-9601-9&partnerID=40&md5=0495824a03cedfe9e8dee95e3ff2c370
McPherson, S. (2011). Reading class, examining men: Anthologies, education and literary cultures. In The Masculine Middlebrow, 1880-1950: What Mr Miniver Read (pp. 24–37). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230316577_2
Ölmez, E., & Can Aran, Ö. (2025). The Effect of Digital Storytelling on High School Students’ English Writing Skills and Foreign Language Anxiety Levels. Participatory Educational Research, 12(3), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.25.42.12.3
Orr, Z., & Romem, A. (2021). Teaching the holocaust in nursing schools: The perspective of the victims and survivors. In International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85113429967&doi=10.3390%2Fijerph18178969&partnerID=40&md5=2ebf540c7a31d3977c39534eea924c0e
Robbins-Welty, G., May, D., Shirey, K., Strong, C., Carosa, C., Vanderloo, C., Hildenbrand, J., Vestal, H., Riordan, P., Yanez, D., Lerebours, R., & Niu, K. (2025a). “Read One, Write One”: Improving Medical Student Clinical Documentation on the Psychiatry Clerkship Using Example Notes. Academic Psychiatry, 49(4), 350–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-025-02168-w
Robbins-Welty, G., May, D., Shirey, K., Strong, C., Carosa, C., Vanderloo, C., Hildenbrand, J., Vestal, H., Riordan, P., Yanez, D., Lerebours, R., & Niu, K. (2025b). “Read One, Write One”: Improving Medical Student Clinical Documentation on the Psychiatry Clerkship Using Example Notes. Academic Psychiatry, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-025-02168-w
Sholeh, K., Pamungkas, O. Y., & Sufanti, M. (2025). The Character Education Revolution: The Impact of Multiple Intelligence-Based Reading Learning on Student Development. Educational Process: International Journal, 15(1), 1–21.
Strong, J. Z., Tortorelli, L. S., & Anderson, B. E. (2025). Read STOP Write: Teaching foundational skills in a multicomponent informational reading and writing intervention. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 68(4), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1389
Swathi, M., Ramesh, M., Sathyaseelan, T., Muralikrishnan, S. S., Pettela, R., & Arun, G. (2025). Factors Influencing Students’ Performance in Second Language Writing Skills. World Journal of English Language, 15(5), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n5p189
Suparman, S., & Charmilasari, C. (2017). Analysis of Phase Structure Realization in Classroom Discourse: A Study of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 4(2), 120-126.
Taufik, O. A., & Pamungkas, O. Y. (2025). Mapping Determinants of Success through Information Systems in Higher Education: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Educational Process: International Journal, 33(5), 505–519.
Tiew, K. G., Basri, N. E. A., Deng, H., Watanabe, K., Zain, S. M., & Wang, S. (2019). Comparative study on recycling behaviours between regular recyclers and non regular recyclers in Malaysia. Journal of Environmental Management, 237, 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.033
Wildemuth, B. M. (2007). Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science. Libraries Unlimited. https://doi.org/10.1075/hop.11.thi1
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Heni Kurniawati, Eko Suroso
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
