Cultural Pedagogy in Practice: Embedding Torajan Heritage in Language Learning Resources

https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v9i2.6557

Authors

  • Elim Trika Sudarsi Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja

Keywords:

Cultural pedagogy, Torajan Heritage, Learning Resources

Abstract

This study explores how the integration of Torajan cultural elements into English language learning materials can enhance language acquisition and students’ understanding of local culture. Employing a qualitative approach, data were collected through observations and interviews with lecturers and students from the English Department. The findings reveal that the integration of Torajan culture in the classroom is achieved through curriculum adaptation, context-based approaches, and creative projects. Specific cultural elements included folklore (e.g., ulelean pare), traditional arts, dances, rituals, culinary heritage, traditional clothing, and everyday life in Toraja society.

The study shows that embedding these cultural components had a highly positive and significant impact on students’ comprehension. It fostered greater engagement and motivation, improved language proficiency, deepened cultural awareness, and encouraged an appreciation for cultural diversity and multiculturalism. Additionally, the integration allowed students to form emotional connections with learning materials and strengthened their critical thinking, evaluative, and reflective skills. These findings suggest that the application of local cultural content not only enriches language learning but also contributes to students’ holistic development as culturally aware and globally competent individual.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing Women's Worlds: Bedouin Stories. University of California Press.

Abu-Lughod, L. (1991). Writing Against Culture. In R. G. Fox (Ed.), Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. School of American Research Press.

Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press.

Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77-101.

Creswell JW, Clark P, V.L. . Designing and conducting mixed methods research. second ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2010.

Eriksen, T. H. (1993). Ethnicity and Nationalism: Anthropological Perspectives. Pluto Press.

Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American journal of theoretical and applied statistics. 2016;5(1):1-4.

Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books.

Herskovits, M. J. (1947). Man and His Works: The Science of Cultural Anthropology. Alfred A. Knopf.

Gupta, A., & Ferguson, J. (1997). Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology. Duke University Press.

Hewitt-Taylor J. Use of constant comparative analysis in qualitative research. Nursing Standard (through 2013). 2001;15(42):39.

Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Vintage Books.

Parker C, Scott S, Geddes A. Snowball sampling. SAGE research methods foundations. 2019.

Rai N, Thapa B. A study on purposive sampling method in research. Kathmandu: Kathmandu School of Law. 2015;5.

Suryani A. Comparing case study and ethnography as qualitative research approaches. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi. 2008;5(1).

Turner, V. (1967). The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Elim Trika Sudarsi. (2023). Cultural Pedagogy in Practice: Embedding Torajan Heritage in Language Learning Resources. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 9(2), 1795–1801. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v9i2.6557

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories