Challenges Faced by Generation Z Learners in Using Video Tasks to Enhance English Speaking Skills through the TPACK Approach

https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i2.5743

Authors

  • Anida Fadhilah Jati Sekolah Tinggi Bahasa Asing Cipto Hadi Pranoto, Bekasi, Indonesia

Keywords:

Generation Z, TPACK, video-based tasks, English speaking skills

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the challenges faced by Generation Z students in utilizing video-based tasks to enhance their English-Speaking skills through the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework. Generation Z, born between 1997 and 2012, has grown up surrounded by digital technology, which makes them highly familiar with digital tools but also presents challenges when traditional teaching methods fail to align with their tech-driven learning preferences. This study aims to identify the barriers these students encounter when using video-based tasks in language learning, particularly in terms of technology, pedagogy, and content integration. The research was conducted with 30 English Literature students at a private university in Bekasi, Indonesia. A narrative inquiry methodology was used, involving semi-structured interviews, observations, and document analysis, which were analyzed thematically using a multiple case study approach. The findings reveal key challenges such as limited access to technology, time management difficulties, and psychological barriers like embarrassment or lack of confidence when speaking on camera. Despite these challenges, the study highlights that, with appropriate support and integration of the TPACK framework, video-based tasks significantly improve students' speaking proficiency and creativity. This research underscores the importance of considering both technological and psychological factors to optimize language learning experiences for Generation Z students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, A. A. A., Hassan, I., Pallathadka, H., Keezhatta, M. S., Noorman Haryadi, R., Al Mashhadani, Z. I., Yahya Attwan, L., & Rohi, A. (2022). MALL and EFL learners’ speaking: Impacts of Duolingo and WhatsApp applications on speaking accuracy and fluency. Education Research International, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6716474

Ahmed, V., & Opoku, A. (2022). Technology supported learning and pedagogy in times of crisis: the case of COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 365–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10706-w

Ajloni, M., & O’Toole, M. (2021). Conceptualizing pedagogical processes in video-based learning: cognitive, behavioral, and affective roles of video technology in teaching practice. LUMAT-B: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 6(1), 1–17.

Alenezi, M., Wardat, S., & Akour, M. (2023). The need of integrating digital education in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 15(6), 4782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064782

Babelyuk, O., Koliasa, O., Lopushanskyy, V., Smaglii, V., & Yukhymets, S. (2021). Psychological difficulties during the covid lockdown: Video in blended digital teaching language, literature, and culture. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.13

Chen, S., van Tilburg, W. A. P., & Leman, P. J. (2023). Women’s self-objectification and strategic self-presentation on social media. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 47(2), 266–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843221143751

Chunta, K., Shellenbarger, T., & Chicca, J. (2021). Generation Z students in the online environment: Strategies for nurse educators. Nurse Educator, 46(2), 87–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000000872

de Vaate, N. A. J. D. B., Veldhuis, J., & Konijn, E. A. (2020). How online self-presentation affects well-being and body image: A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 47, 101316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101316

Feiyue, Z. (2022). Edutainment methods in the learning process: Quickly, fun and satisfying. International Journal of Environment, Engineering and Education, 4(1), 19–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55151/ijeedu.v4i1.41

Goldsmith, L. J. (2021). Using framework analysis in applied qualitative research. Qualitative Report, 26(6), 2061–2076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.5011

Haryadi, R. (2023). Opportunities And Challenges In Integrating Technology In Learning English. Jolali (Journal of Applied Language and Literacy Studies), 2(2).

Haryadi, R. N., & Usman, H. M. (2024). The Influence Of Heutagogy In Measuring The Effectiveness Of Student Learning. Jurnal Tahsinia, 5(5), 793–803.

Hensley, L., Sayers, R., Brady, A., & Cutshall, J. (2021). Supporting autonomy, competence, and relatedness in a learning-to-learn course: College students insights into effective instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 48(3), 236–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320977270

Klofutar, Š., Jerman, J., & Torkar, G. (2022). Direct versus vicarious experiences for developing childrens skills of observation in early science education. International Journal of Early Years Education, 30(4), 863–880. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2020.1814214

Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044

Mujallid, A. (2021). Instructors’ Readiness to Teach Online: A Review of TPACK Standards in Online Professional Development Programmes in Higher Education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(7), 135–150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.7.8

Neufeld-Wall, M. E. (2023). Being Real: Gen-Z, Self-Presentation, and Authenticity on Social Media.

Pugu, M. R., Riyanto, S., & Haryadi, R. N. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian; Konsep, Strategi, dan Aplikasi. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Ragatz, M. E. (2022). Tech-Savvy Educators Perceptions of Using Smartphones for Self-Directed Professional Development. Walden University.

Sablić, M., Mirosavljević, A., & Škugor, A. (2021). Video-based learning (VBL)past, present and future: An overview of the research published from 2008 to 2019. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 1061–1077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09455-5

Salmons, J., & Wilson, L. A. (2023). Learning to collaborate, collaborating to learn: Engaging students in the classroom and online. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003445708

Sari, H., Liu, M.-C., Anshari, A., Yang, C. C., Wahida, A., & Nurhayati, A. (2024). The Role of Socio-Cultural on Online Learning Performance: The Role of Students Experience. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 10(2), 1549–1558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i2.3532

Ümmet, D., Tekiner, B., & Ericstiren, .Izel. (2021). Examining university students’ feelings of the inadequacy in the context of their relationship with their parents and friendship quality. {.I}zmir Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 84–95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.47899/ijss.20213108

Vetrivel, S. C., Arun, V. P., Maheswari, R., & Saravanan, T. P. (2024). Technology Integration in Online Learning Platforms: Blended Learning Gamification. In Transdisciplinary Teaching and Technological Integration for Improved Learning: Case Studies and Practical Approaches (pp. 219–247). IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-8217-2.ch011

Yevdokymova, N. (2024). The Psychology of Personalized Education: Enhancing Learning through Individualization. Available at SSRN 4732923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4732923

Published

2025-04-25

How to Cite

Jati, A. F. (2025). Challenges Faced by Generation Z Learners in Using Video Tasks to Enhance English Speaking Skills through the TPACK Approach. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 11(2), 1974–1986. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i2.5743

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories