Writing Strategies Used by High-Achieving Students in Academic Writing
https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v11i2.5652
Keywords:
Academic writing, Writing strategies, High-achieving students, Thematic analysisAbstract
Academic writing is a fundamental competency in higher education, requiring students to develop structured arguments, integrate credible sources, and maintain coherence throughout their writing. This study investigates the academic writing strategies employed by high-achieving students, focusing on five key themes: pre-writing strategies, effective use of academic sources, drafting and structuring arguments, revision and self-editing techniques, and time management. Employing a qualitative case study approach, this research was conducted at Universitas Muhammadiyah Enrekang, involving 15 fifth-semester students from the English Education Department who had successfully completed the Academic Writing course with outstanding academic performance. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns in students’ writing strategies. The findings reveal that high-achieving students systematically engage in pre-writing planning, utilize effective citation and paraphrasing techniques, structure their arguments logically and coherently, revise their work through multiple drafts and peer feedback, and employ disciplined time management strategies to optimize their writing process. These results suggest that explicit instruction in academic writing strategies, integrated peer-review practices, and the use of digital writing tools can significantly enhance students' academic writing proficiency. The study provides pedagogical implications for improving academic writing instruction, particularly in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts.
Downloads
References
Al-Jarf, R. (2009). Enhancing freshman students’ writing skills with a mind-mapping software. The Asian EFL Journal, 11(4), 4–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3901075
Asbar, A., Mahmud, M., Halim, A., & Solli, N. (2024, August). Innovative Tech-Enhanced Genre-Based Instruction In English Language Teaching. In Proceeding The 3rd English National Seminar 2024" Tech Trends in English Language Teaching" (pp. 7-14). English Education Study Program Stkip Pgri Pacitan.
Boice, R. (1994). How writers journey to comfort and fluency: A psychological adventure. Praeger. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400667015
Bremner, S. (2018). Genre and second language academic writing. Springer.
Britton, B. K., & Tesser, A. (1991). Effects of time-management practices on college grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(3), 405–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.3.405 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.83.3.405
Ferris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607201
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198115885
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2018). An examination of the design principles underlying effective writing instruction for students with learning disabilities. Cambridge University Press.
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools. Carnegie Corporation of New York.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.
Harwood, N., & Petrić, B. (2012). Performance in paraphrasing source material: A study of students’ strategies. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(2), 95–111.
Howard, R. M., Serviss, T., & Rodrigue, T. K. (2010). Writing from sources, writing from sentences. Writing & Pedagogy, 2(2), 177–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.v2i2.177
Hyland, K. (2018). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108635547
Kellogg, R. T. (2008). Training writing skills: A cognitive developmental perspective. Journal of Writing Research, 1(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2008.01.01.1
Li, J. (2020). The role of automated feedback in improving student writing. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(1), 79–103.
Liu, J., & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8952
MacArthur, C. A. (2007). Best practices in teaching evaluation and revision. In S. Graham, C. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (pp. 141–162). Guilford Press.
McCulloch, S. (2012). Investigating the reading-to-write process of competent student writers: A case study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 1–9.
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009030199
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Ong, J. (2014). An investigation of the pre-writing strategies of EFL proficient and less proficient writers. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 18(3), 1–23.
Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J. (2014). Development of rhetorical and genre moves in undergraduate literature reviews. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 48–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.001
Suparman, S., Herdiana, B., & Nuruahmad, M. (2025). Analisis Nilai pada Lagu" Sandaran Hati" Karya Letto. DEIKTIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 5(1), 89-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53769/deiktis.v5i1.1326
Pecorari, D. (2013). Teaching to avoid plagiarism: How to promote good source use. Open University Press.
Steel, P. (2007). The nature of procrastination: A meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 65–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65
Wingate, U. (2012). Argument! Helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2), 145–154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
