Social Phenomena Related to Fraudulent General Election Results in Indonesia 2024: Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective

https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i2.3623

Authors

  • Eko Sugiarto Universitas Bali Dwipa

Keywords:

Fraudulent election results, Systemic Functional Linguistics, Language manipulation, Public trust, Indonesian society

Abstract

This research delves into the societal implications of fraudulent general election results in Indonesia, with a specific focus on the 2024 presidential election. Applying Systemic Functional Linguistics, the study examines the language use in elections, the repercussions of fraudulent activities on public trust, and the broader impact on Indonesian society. Through detailed data collection and analysis methods, the study uncovers linguistic patterns in fraudulent clauses, discourse strategies employed, and the manipulation of language to influence public sentiment. By identifying fraudulent clauses in news reports, the research sheds light on the intricate nature of election fraud and its historical context. The findings underscore the significant role of language in shaping perceptions and behaviors within the electoral system, emphasizing the need for valid data in understanding and addressing fraudulent practices. Ultimately, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of election fraud's complexities and its far-reaching consequences on Indonesian society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dr. I Ketut Suardana, M.Hum. (2021). Klausa SudutPandang: Systemic functional linguistics. Denpasar: SwastaNulus.

Alan Davies (1998). An introduction to applied linguistics, Second edition. Edinburgh.

Yule, G. (1996). A language will have functions in the context of its use, (p. 4).

Halliday, M. (1973). Language has three metafunctions: the ideational, the interpersonal, and the textual. The Essential Halliday. London and New York: Continuum. Chapter 12: Metafunctions.

Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1989). The transitivity system is a resource for making choices about how experience is to be represented in language; it is concerned with the way in which a clause represents what it is about, (p. 25). Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford, OUP.

Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.

O’Donnell, M. (2012). Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics for Discourse Analysis. Language, Function and Cognition, pp. 1-8.

Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress. (1988). Social semiotics. Cambridge: Polity.

Michael Hoey. (1991). Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford University Press.

Suparman, S., & Charmilasari, C. (2017). Analysis of Phase Structure Realization in Classroom Discourse: A Study of Systemic Functional Linguistics. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 4(2), 120-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30605/ethicallingua.v4i2.624

Sarundajang, SH. (2009). Birokrasi dalam Otonomi Daerah Upaya Mengatasi Kegagalan. Jakarta: Kata.

Clawson, R. A. & Oxley, Z. M. (2020). Public opinion: Democratic ideals, democratic practice.

Published

2024-05-02

How to Cite

Eko Sugiarto. (2024). Social Phenomena Related to Fraudulent General Election Results in Indonesia 2024: Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 10(2), 1877–1889. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i2.3623

Issue

Section

Articles

Categories