The Analysis of Gender Position in English Language Teaching Coursebooks: Pathway to English for The Senior High School
Abstract
The gender status in ELT (English Language Teaching) textbooks for Eleventh Grade Students is examined in this study. The study goals are as follows: to determine what gender position is equal in the textbook Pathway to English and to identify what male and female roles are appropriate for their gender position in the textbook. Content analysis was employed as the study approach. The data from this study were studied in six areas of gender, and they are: Female or male graphical depiction or illustration, female and male characters who play professional/occupational roles, proper nouns, pronouns, common nouns, and titles are all stated as female or male. Female and male role models: The number of role models, female/male activities are any actions performed by a female or a man. The pattern of mentioning female/male names refers to female and male characters in the same sentence. The data shows that the numerical representation of females in this book is less than males in all aspects.
Downloads
References
Anjarwati, D. (2020). Gender Representation in The English Textbook (Vol. 2507, Issue February). Insitute of Islamic Studies Purwokerto.
Ariyanto, S. (2018). A Portrait of Gender Bias in the Prescribed Indonesian ELT Textbook for Junior High School Students. Sexuality and Culture, 22(4), 1054–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-018-9512-8
Azhari, H. (2021). an Analysis of Gender Construction in English Textbook for Secondary School. http://repository.iainbengkulu.ac.id/5359/
Barton, A., & Sakwa, L. N. (2012). The representation of gender in English textbooks in Uganda. Pedagogy, Culture, and Society, 20(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.669394
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
Brugeilles, S. C. & C. (2009). Analyzing gender representations in school textbooks. In Les Collections du CEPED.Les Clefs pour.
Chan, C. K. Y. (2015). Use of animation in engaging teachers and students in assessment in Hong Kong higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 52(5), 474–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.847795
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. In Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980902922143
Davies J, Sandra Richardson, Ken Gaudet, Lois Adams, K. J. (2008). Evaluation and Selection of Learning Resources : A Guide. In Canada: Prince Edward Island Department of Education. www.gov.pe.ca/educ
Dewiki, S. (2008). Perspektif Gender dalam Bahan Ajar Cetak pada Pendidikan Jarak Jauh. Jurnal Pendidikan Terbuka Dan Jarak Jauh, 9, 41–50.
Donald Ary; Lucy C. Jacobs, and C. K. S. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education 8th Edition. Cengage Learning.
Fadhila Yonata & Yan Mujiyanto. (2017). The Representation of Gender in English Textbooks in Indonesia. Journal Lof Language and Literature, 12(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.669394
Fahriany, F., Alek, A., & Wekke, I. S. (2019). Gender Representation in English Textbooks for Islamic Junior High School Students. Kafa`ah: Journal of Gender Studies, 8(2), 149. https://doi.org/10.15548/jk.v8i2.221
Hall, M. (2014). Gender representation in current EFL textbooks in Iranian secondary schools. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(2), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.5.2.253-261
Hamdan, S., & Jalabneh, A. (2009). Topics in EFL Textbooks and the Question of Gender Dominance : A Case Study from Public Schools of Jordan. International Journal, 28, 52–56.
Holmes, Janet and Meyerhoff, M. (2003). The Handbook of Language and Gender. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. Blackwell Publisher.
Johansson, S., & Malmsjö Bachelder, K. (2009). Gender bias in EFL textbook dialogues. http://muep.mau.se/handle/2043/8217
Lee, J. F. K., & Mahmoudi-Gahrouei, V. (2020). Gender Representation in Instructional Materials: A Study of Iranian English Language Textbooks and Teachers’ Voices. Sexuality and Culture, 24(4), 1107–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-020-09747-z
Lewis, M., & Lupyan, G. (2020). Gender stereotypes are reflected in the distributional structure of 25 languages. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(10), 1021–1028. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0918-6
Mustapha, A. S. (2013). Gender and Language Education Research: A Review. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.3.454-463
Muthali’in, A. (2001). Bias Gender dalam Pendidikan. Muhammadiyah University Press.
Prior, L. (2008). Using Document in Social Research. Sociology, 42(5), 821–836. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094564
Stockdale, D. A. (2006). Gender representation in an EFL textbook. Bulletin of Niigata Institute of Technology, 13(October), 900–906. www.niit.ac.jp/lib/contents/kiyo/genko/13/14_MINESHIMA.pdf
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (SIDA). (2015). Gender Analysis – Principles & Elements Sida definitions. March, 1–4.
Weninger, C. (2018). Textbook Analysis. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1489
Yang, C. C. R. (2011). Gender representation in a Hong Kong primary English textbook series: The relationship between language planning and social policy. Current Issues in Language Planning, 12(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2011.541390
Zhao, J., Wang, T., Yatskar, M., Cotterell, R., Ordonez, V., & Chang, K. W. (2019). Gender bias in contextualized word embeddings. NAACL HLT 2019 - 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies - Proceedings of the Conference, 1, 629–634. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-1064
Copyright (c) 2024 Afifah Nur Amalia, Didin Nuruddin Hidayat, Nida Husna, Alek Alek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.