Reinventing Corrective Feedback Strategies In A Higher Education Academic Writing Synchronous Course
https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i2.3384
Keywords:
Academic writing, corrective feedback, higher education, synchronousAbstract
Corrective feedback (CF) for academic writing is essential to improve writing skills. This study discovers how CF strategies are reinvented in an academic writing synchronous course. Therefore, within the framework of sociocultural and humanistic approaches in education, 71 students from two non-quasi classes in a university contributed by sharing their points of view for the CF they received. Class observations and surveys were conducted to gather data on how the CF was given and how the students perceived it. The main findings indicate that the CF was choral to the class, explicit, unfocused, and mixed of oral and written. Furthermore, peer reviews were conducted as the follow-up activity. Through these CF strategies, most participants have positive acceptance and comprehension. They also approve that their academic writing skills improved after the course ended. Despite a small number of students who preferred a direct one-on-one basis, this research shows pedagogical CF strategies and efficacies towards independent learning that are prevalent and feasible to the continuous online or hybrid learning systems nowadays.
Downloads
References
Amini, D. (2014). Teacher and Learner in Humanistic Language Teaching. Journal Od Applied Linguistics and Applied Literature: Dynamics and Advances, 2(1), 13–24. http://jalda.azaruniv.ac.ir/article_13515.html#
Banaruee, H., Khoshsima, H., & Askari, A. (2017). Corrective Feedback and Personality Type: A Case Study of Iranian L2 Learners. Global Journal of Educational Studies, 3(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.5296/gjes.v3i2.11501 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5296/gjes.v3i2.11501
Beuningen, catherine van. (2010). Corrective Feedback in L2 Writing: Theoretical Perspectives, Empirical Insights, and Future Directions. 10(0), 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119171
Bitchener, J., & Knotch, U. (2010). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1060374310000421 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269930410_Thematic_analysis DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/13620-004
CARL ROGERS AND HUMANISTIC EDUCATION. (1977). In Chapter 5 in Patterson, C. H. Foundations for a Theory of Instruction and Educational Psychology. Harper & Row, 1977). http://www.sageofasheville.com/pub_downloads/CARL_ROGERS_AND_HUMANISTIC_EDUCATION.pdf#
Chen, L. S., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Writing Instruction: A Meta-Analysis A Need to Examine Factors That Mitigate the Effect of Corrective Feedback (Vol. 24, Issue 3). www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume24/ej95/ej95a3/
Cherciov, M. (2012). Investigating the impact of attitude on first language attrition and second language acquisition from a Dynamic Systems Theory perspective. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006912454622 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006912454622
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conducting, andEvaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, 4th edition. http://repository.unmas.ac.id/medias/journal/EBK-00121.pdf#
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Approaches. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=908773
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2009). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292424113_Implicit_and_explicit_corrective_feedback_and_the_acquisition_of_L2_grammar DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691767-015
Erlam, R., Ellis, R., & Batstone, R. (2013). Oral corrective feedback on L2 writing: Two approaches compared. System, 41(2), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.03.004
Eslami, E. (2014). The Effects of Direct and Indirect Corrective Feedback Techniques on EFL Students ’ Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.438 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.438
Farikah, & Yuwono, A. (2018). Carl Ransom Rogers’ Theory in Paragraph Writing Class. English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings, 2(87), 102–107.
Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161–184. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S106037430100039X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X
Guichon, N., & Bét, M. (2012). Managing written and oral negative feedback in a synchronous online teaching situation. January 2012, 37–41. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09588221.2011.636054?journalCode=ncal20 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.636054
Hassen, S. K., Adugna, E. T., & Bogale, and Y. N. (2023). Effects of Scffolding Strategies Instruction on EFL Students’ Writing Achievement and Perceptions. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Learning, 26(1), 272–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i1.6109
Hosseiny, M. (2014). The Role of Direct and Indirect Written Corrective Feedback in Improving Iranian EFL Students ’ Writing Skill. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 668–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.466 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.466
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Jamalinesari, A., Rahimi, F., Gowhary, H., & Azizifar, A. (2015). The Effects of Teacher-Written Direct vs . Indirect Feedback on Students ’ Writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 116–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.018
James P. Lantolf, Thorne, S. L., & Poehner, M. E. (2015). heories in Second Language Acquisition. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313795407_Lantolf_J_Thorne_S_L_Poehner_M_2015_Sociocultural_Theory_and_Second_Language_Development_In_B_van_Patten_J_Williams_Eds_Theories_in_Second_Language_Acquisition_pp_207-226_New_York_Routledge
Jingna, D. (2012). Application of Humanism Theory in the Teaching Approach. Higher Education of Social Science, 3(1), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.hess.1927024020120301.1593
Kenza, T. (2021). The effect of self-assessment on the development of EFL reading comprehension skills. Journal of English Education and Teaching , 5(2), 231–247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.5.2.231-247
Kim, B.-J. (2011). Incorporating Oral Corrective Feedback into the Business English Writing Class *. In English Language & Literature Teaching (Vol. 17, Issue 3).
Kongsuebchart, J., & Suppasetseree, S. (2016). A WEBLOG-BASED ELECTRONIC PORTFOLIO TO IMPROVE ENGLISH WRITING SKILLS OF THAI EFL. 148–158.
Lee, G., & Scallet, D. L. (2008). Meeting in the margins: Effects of the teacher–student relationship on revision processes of EFL college students taking a composition course. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222973128_Meeting_in_the_margins_Effects_of_the_teacher-student_relationship_on_revision_processes_of_EFL_college_students_taking_a_composition_course DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.002
Liu, Q., & Brown, D. (2015). Methodological synthesis of research on the effectiveness of corrective feedback in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.08.011
Magno, C., & Amarles, A. (2015). Teachers ’ Feedback Practices in Second Language Academic Writing Classrooms. May. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277405360_Teachers’_Feedback_Practices_in_Second_Language_Academic_Writing_Classrooms
Mali, Y. C. G. (2023). LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Learning http://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT
Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Learning, 26(1), 293–310. https://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT/article/view/5296
Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian Perspective on Corrective Feedback in L2 : The Effect of Random Versus Negotiated Help on the Learning of English Articles A Vygotskian Perspective on Corrective Feedback in L2 : The Effect of Random Versus Negotiated Help on the Learning of . January 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410008667135 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410008667135
Öztürk, G. (2016). JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND LINGUISTIC STUDIES An investigation on the use of oral corrective feedback in Turkish EFL classrooms. In Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies (Vol. 12, Issue 2). www.jlls.org
Purwanti, M. S., & Kastuhandani, F. C. (2023). Students Perceived Confidence in Writing Published Articles. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 26(1), 153–167. https://e-journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/LLT/article/view/5407 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v26i1.5407
Rahayu, D. (2016). Bilingualism of Two Indonesian Siblings Living in Australia. 3(2). https://doi.org/10.17969/siele.v3i2.4959 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v3i2.4959
Rahayu, D. (2020). Interaction in collaborative writing between international and domestic students in an Indonesian university. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15773 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i1.15773
Razali, R., & Jupri, R. (2014). Exploring Teacher Written Feedback and Student Revisions on ESL Students’ Writing. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(5), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-19556370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-19556370
Romrome, A. Y., & Mbato, C. L. (2022). Exploring EFL students’ motivation in essay writing through writing beliefs, self-efficacy, and attitudes: a case from Papua, Indonesia. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 13(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v13i1.4561 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v13i1.4561
Sarvestani, M. S. (2015). The Effect of Written Corrective Feedback on Writing Accuracy of Intermediate Learners. 5(10), 2046–2052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0510.10
Sepehrinia, S., & Mehdizadeh, M. (2018). Oral corrective feedback: teachers’ concerns and researchers’ orientation. Language Learning Journal, 46(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1172328 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1172328
Sermsook, K., Liamnimitr, J., & Pochakorn, R. (2017). The Impact of Teacher Corrective Feedback on EFL Student Writers’ Grammatical Improvement. English Language Teaching, 10(10), 43. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n10p43 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n10p43
Sharp, A. (2012). Humanistic Approaches to Learning. In Seel, N.M. (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_530
Sobhani, M., & Tayebipour, F. (2015). The Effects of Oral vs. Written Corrective Feedback on Iranian EFL Learners’ Essay Writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(8), 1601. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0508.09 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0508.09
Srichanyachon, N. (2012). Teacher Written Feedback for L2 Learners ’ Writing Development. 12(1), 7–17.
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing: Case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532
Tayebipour, F. (2019). The impact of written vs. Oral corrective feedback on omani part-time vs. full-time college students’ accurate use and retention of the passive voice. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(1), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1001.17 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1001.17
Tootkaboni, A. A., & Khatib, M. (2014). The Efficacy of Various Kinds of Error Feedback for Improvement in the Writing Accuracy of Iranian EFL Learners. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 7(3). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329315860_The_Efficacy_of_Various_Kinds_of_Error_Feedback_for_Improvement_in_the_Writing_Accuracy_of_Iranian_EFL_Learners#fullTextFileContent DOI: https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.529
Westmacott, A. (2017). Direct vs . Indirect Written Corrective Feedback : Student Perceptions Direct vs . Indirect Written Corrective Feedback : Student Perceptions. 22(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a02
Zand-Moghadam, A., & Alizadeh, M. (2015). The Effect of Corrective Feedback on the Development of Discoursal and Meta Discoursal Aspects of Writing: Written vs. Oral Feedback. In Language Related Research (Vol. 6, Issue 3).
Zumbrunn, S., Marrs, S., & Mewborn, C. (2016). Toward a better understanding of student perceptions of writing feedback: a mixed methods study. Reading and Writing, 29(2), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9599-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9599-3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
