How is The Grammatical Relation of Batak Toba Wedding Ceremony?
Abstract
This article discusses grammatical relations in Toba Batak language. Toba Batak language has formal markings, both predicates and arguments that show the relationship between clause elements, and the coding of words in the language. arguments are integrated syntactically. This research uses descriptive qualitative research. Qualitative is used to investigate an issue in order to gain a clear understanding of a particular phenomenon. The main data of this research are sentences. Sentence data in this study were obtained through traditional Toba Batak documents, namely 'marhata sinamot' which is commonly used Grammatical relations have an important role and function to identify the correctness of the syntactic process because they are considered to connect arguments with clauses. The grammatical relationship and the semantic role of the Toba Batak language are S = A/P and S = P/A. That is, the Toba Batak language treats S as A and S as P. A language is said to be of ergative type if the patient (P) of a transitive verb is treated with or coreferential with the subject (S) in an intransitive clause and different from the agent (A) of the verb transitive.
Downloads
References
Anderson, J. M. (2018). On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. In On Case Grammar (pp. 188–280). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429460869-3
Blake, B. (2002). Relational Grammar. In Relational Grammar. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203221761
Bril, I. (2022). Lexical restrictions on grammatical relations in voice constructions (Northern Amis). STUF - Language Typology and Universals, 75(1), 21–71. https://doi.org/10.1515/stuf-2022-1048
Clemens, L. E., Coon, J., Mateo Pedro, P., Morgan, A. M., Polinsky, M., Tandet, G., & Wagers, M. (2015). Ergativity and the complexity of extraction: a view from Mayan. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33(2), 417–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-014-9260-x
Damanik, S. F., & Mulyadi, M. (2020). Ergativity Case-Marking in Batak Toba Language. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(1), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i1.755
Farrell, P. (2005). Grammatical Relations (Oxford Surveys in Syntax and Morphology). Oxford Surveys in Syntax And Morphology, 245.
Frantz, D. G. (1979). Grammatical relations in universal grammar. Work Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics, University of North Dakota Session, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.31356/silwp.vol23.03
Info, A. (2019). 2598-1803 2581-2130. 3(2), 107–117.
Jufizal. (2020). Ergativity and Subject Deletion in Stylistic-Grammatical Constructions of Minangkabaunese. Jurnal Lazuardi, 3(3), 529–540. https://doi.org/10.53441/jl.vol3.iss3.40
Jufrizal, J. (2018). Fenomena Tipologi Gramatikal Bahasa Minangkabau: Akusatif, Ergatif, Atau Campur? Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajarannya, 3(1), 14–28.
Khanina, O., & Shluinsky, A. (2019). Intransitive verbs in enets: A contribution to the typology of split intransitivity. Zeitschrift Fur Sprachwissenschaft, 38(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfs-2019-0001
Kosmas, J. (2017). Masalah Relasi Gramatikal Bahasa Rongga: Sebuah Kajian Awal. Linguistik Indonesia, 35(1), 1--10.
Mutiara, N. G. (2016). the Analysis of Grammatical Relations Subject and Object in Seven Short Stories of Nasreddin “ the Wise Man .” 4(1), 20–51.
Naibaho, S., & Putri, I. P. (2016). Pola Komunikasi Prosesi Marhata Sinamot Pada Pernikahan Adat Batak Toba Dalam Membentuk Identitas Budaya Suku Batak Toba Di Bandung Communication Patterns of Marhata Sinamot Procession in Batak Toba Traditional Wedding Ceremony To Form the Cultural Identi. Vol. 15, N.
Oghoghophia Famous, I. (2021). Valency in the Urhobo Language. Indian Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(2), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.34256/ijll2125
Pascasarjana, P., & Udayana, U. (2016). Tesis Relasi Gramatikal Bahasa Makasae : Relasi Gramatikal Bahasa Makasae :
Primus, B. (2015). Grammatical relations. Syntax - Theory and Analysis, 1(July), 218–246. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110377408.218
Putri, R., & Yusdi, M. (2020). NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial RELASI GRAMATIKAL SUBJEK BAHASA INDONESIA DALAM SURAT KABAR REPUBLIKA. Tahun, 7(1), 149–161. nusantara: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial available online http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/nusantara/index
Raupova, L. (2020). Logical and Grammatical Relations in Word Categories: The Factor of Difference and Incarnation. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(4), 6828–6833. https://doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24i4/pr2020494
Sanfilippo, A. (1991). Grammatical relations, thematic roles and verb semantics. January 1991. https://www.era.lib.ed.ac.uk/handle/1842/6585
Schlüter, J. (2005). Rhythmic Grammar. In Linguistics.
Sinaga, L. D., & Mulyadi, M. (2023). Grammatical Alliance and Pivot System of Batak Simalungun Language: a Syntactic Typology Study. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa Dan Sastra, 17(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v17i2.16673
Sitompul, M., & Mulyadi, M. (2020). Relasi Gramatikal Dalam Bahasa Batak Toba Dan Gayo Lut. Lingua, 16(1), 1–7.
Suparmin. (2018). Relasi gramatikal. 241, 241–254.
Suzuki, H. (2022). Grammatical relations in Caucasian languages : Preliminary mapping Grammatical relations in Caucasian languages : Preliminary mapping. January.
Tjia, J. (2015). Grammatical relations and grammatical categories in Malay. the Indonesian prefix meN- revisited. Wacana, 16(1), 105–132. https://doi.org/10.17510/wjhi.v16i1.368
.
Copyright (c) 2023 Usman Sidabutar, Mulyadi Mulyadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
