Revitalisasi Nilai Kearifan Lokal melalui Pembelajaran Debat Bahasa Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v8i1.1726
Keywords:
Pembelajaran Debat, Kearifan Lokal, Hibua LamoAbstract
Era globalisasi menggerus nilai dan jati diri bangsa Indonesia. Salah satu nilai yang dimiliki oleh bangsa Indonesia itu adalah Hibualamo. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini akan fokus membahas proses revitalisasi karakter bangsa melalui pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia berbasis nilai kearifan lokal. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan memanfaatkan studi pustaka sebagai strateginya. Hasilnya, nilai Hibualamo yaitu O dora, O Hayangi, O baliara, O adili, dan O adiai dapat diintegrasikan dalam materi debat bahasa Indonesia dan berpotensi besar dalam materi pembelajaran yang lain. Nilai-nilai tersebut dapat masuk dalam setiap sintak pembelajaran, khususnya pada materi debat. Hal ini juga akan menjaga esensi debat sebagai pembelajaran kolaboratif. Artinya, esensi debat tidak sebatas pada kompetitif, tetapi pada proses pemecahan masalah secara bersama. Simpulan yang dapat dirumuskan dari penelitian ini yaitu, guru harus lebih inovatif dalam mengambangkan model pembelajaran dalam K-13. K-13 memungkinkan guru untuk menginternalisasi nilai budaya lokal sebagai wujud kontekstualisasi dalam kegiatan pembelajaran.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1989). The construct validation of self-ratings of communicative language ability. Language Testing. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228900600104
Berdine, R. (1984). Increasing Student Involvement in the Learning Process Through Debate on Controversial Topics. Journal of Management Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256298700900303
Blanche, P., & Merino, B. J. (1989). Self‐Assessment of Foreign‐Language Skills: Implications for Teachers and Researchers. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00595.x
Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. In Handbook I: Cognitive Domain.
Boediman, L. S. (2018). Belajar dari Spiritualitas Masyarakat Hibualamo untuk Pengembangan Teologi Kontekstual. 2, 51–56.
Bourke, J. M. (2006). Designing a topic-based syllabus for young learners. ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl008
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language teaching and learning. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Buttjes, D. (1990). Teaching foreign language and culture: Social impact and political significance. Language Learning Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739085200471
Chen, C. C., & Huang, T. C. (2012). Learning in a u-Museum: Developing a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.003
Chen, C. M., & Li, Y. L. (2010). Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective english vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820802602329
Chen, M. P., Wang, L. C., Zou, D., Lin, S. Y., & Xie, H. (2019). Effects of caption and gender on junior high students’ EFL learning from iMap-enhanced contextualized learning. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103602
Choesin, E. M. (2014). Connectionism: Alternatif dalam Memahami Dinamika Pengetahuan Lokal dalam Globalisasi. Antropologi Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v0i69.3440
De Leger, D. Saint. (2009). Self-Assessment of speaking skills and participation in a foreign language class. Foreign Language Annals. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01013.x
Forsyth, H., & Evans, J. (2019). Authentic assessment for a more inclusive history. Higher Education Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1581140
Goodwin, J. (2003). Students’ perspectives on debate exercises in content area classes. In Communication Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520302466
Grice, H. P. (1975). Grice (1975)- Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics 3: Speech arts.
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Bastioens, T. J. (2010). A Five-Dimensional Framework Authentic Assessment for. Educational Teachnology Research and Development.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, K. (2014). Cohesion in English. In Cohesion in English. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315836010
I.J., W., A., A., S., V., F., S., K.-K., L., P., J., J., D., D., D., & B.R., F. (2011). Effects of a Social-Emotional and Character Development Program on the Trajectory of Behaviors Associated with Social-Emotional and Character Development: Findings from Three Randomized Trials. Prevention Science.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1985). Classroom Conflict: Controversy Versus Debate in Learning Groups. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312022002237
Kim, D., & Gilman, D. A. (2008). Effects of text, audio, and graphic aids in multimedia instruction for vocabulary learning. Educational Technology and Society.
Kinginger, C., & Wu, Q. (2018). Learning Chinese through Contextualized Language Practices in Study Abroad Residence Halls: Two Case Studies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190518000077
Korkmaz, S., & Korkmaz, Ş. Ç. (2013). Contextualization or De-contextualization: Student Teachers’ Perceptions about Teaching a Language in Context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.299
Kuat, F. (2009). Nilai-nilai adat Hibua Lamo dan implikasinya bagi pembangunan Halmahera Utara. Hein Dan Hibua Lamo.“Tobelo Pos” Menelusuri Jejak Kepemimpinannya, 53-74.
Lan, T. J. (2011). Heterogeneity, politics of ethnicity, and multiculturalism What is a viable framework for Indonesia? Wacana, Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.17510/wjhi.v13i2.24
Mahsun, M. S. (2014). Teks dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kurikulum 2013. In Teks dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indoensia Kurikulum 2013.
Muharom Albantani, A., & Madkur, A. (2018). Think Globally, Act Locally: The Strategy of Incorporating Local Wisdom in Foreign Language Teaching in Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.2p.1
Mungmachon, M. R. (2012). Knowledge and Local Wisdom : Community Treasure. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science.
Musselman, E. G. (2004). Using Structured Debate to Achieve Autonomous Student Discussion. The History Teacher. https://doi.org/10.2307/1555673
Nakrowi, Z. S. (2018). Revitalisasi Budaya Hibualamo melalui Implementasi Teknik Pembelajaran Ethnodrama. 2, 18–25.
Nasional, K. P. (2010). Pengembangan pendidikan budaya dan karakter bangsa. Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pusat Kurikulum.
Parwati, N. N., Tegeh, I. M., & Mariawan, I. M. (2018). Integrating the Values of Local Wisdom into the Learning Model: Building Positive Student Character. In Educational Technology to Improve Quality and Access on a Global Scale. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66227-5_23
Plato. (2005). Plato: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus. In Loeb Classical Library.
Rasna, I. W., & Tantra, D. K. (2017). Reconstruction of Local Wisdom for Character Education through the Indonesia Language Learning: An Ethno-pedagogical Methodology. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0712.09
Ross, S. (1998). Self-assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229801500101
Roy, A., & Macchiette, B. (2005). Debating the issues: A tool for augmenting critical thinking skills of marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475305280533
Sahin, M. C. (2009). Instructional design principles for 21st century learning skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.258
Snider, A., & Schnurer, M. (2006). Many sides : Debate Across the Curriculum. In International Debate Education Association.
Suryadi, A., & Tilaar. (1993). Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Swan, M. (2018). The Practice of English Language Teaching, 5th edition. ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx060
Tench, R. (2003). Stakeholder influences on the writing skills debate: A reflective evaluation in the context of vocational business education. Journal of Further and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877032000128118
Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer Assessment, Theory into Practise. In Theory Into Practice.
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument: Updated edition. In The Uses of Argument: Updated Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
Tsai, P. S., Tsai, C. C., & Hwang, G. H. (2016). The effects of instructional methods on students’ learning outcomes requiring different cognitive abilities: context-aware ubiquitous learning versus traditional instruction. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1035730
Tumposky, N. R. (2004). The Debate Debate. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. https://doi.org/10.3200/tchs.78.2.52-56
Viva.co.id. (2017). “Anies Baswedan Anggap Lawan Debat Sebagai Teman Berpikir.” https://www.viva.co.id/berita/metro/869753-anies-baswedan-anggap-lawan-debat-sebagai-teman-berpikir
Vo, H. X., & Morris, R. L. (2006). Debate as a Tool in Teaching Economics: Rationale, Technique, and Some Evidence. Journal of Education for Business. https://doi.org/10.3200/joeb.81.6.315-320
Yunian Putra, R. W., & Indriani, P. (2017). Implementasi Etnomatematika Berbasis Budaya Lokal dalam Pembelajaran Matematika pada Jenjang Sekolah Dasar. NUMERICAL (Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika). https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v1i1.118
Berdine, R. (1984). Increasing Student Involvement in the Learning Process Through Debate on Controversial Topics. Journal of Management Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256298700900303
Blanche, P., & Merino, B. J. (1989). Self‐Assessment of Foreign‐Language Skills: Implications for Teachers and Researchers. Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00595.x
Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. In Handbook I: Cognitive Domain.
Boediman, L. S. (2018). Belajar dari Spiritualitas Masyarakat Hibualamo untuk Pengembangan Teologi Kontekstual. 2, 51–56.
Bourke, J. M. (2006). Designing a topic-based syllabus for young learners. ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl008
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language teaching and learning. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Buttjes, D. (1990). Teaching foreign language and culture: Social impact and political significance. Language Learning Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571739085200471
Chen, C. C., & Huang, T. C. (2012). Learning in a u-Museum: Developing a context-aware ubiquitous learning environment. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.003
Chen, C. M., & Li, Y. L. (2010). Personalised context-aware ubiquitous learning system for supporting effective english vocabulary learning. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820802602329
Chen, M. P., Wang, L. C., Zou, D., Lin, S. Y., & Xie, H. (2019). Effects of caption and gender on junior high students’ EFL learning from iMap-enhanced contextualized learning. Computers and Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103602
Choesin, E. M. (2014). Connectionism: Alternatif dalam Memahami Dinamika Pengetahuan Lokal dalam Globalisasi. Antropologi Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v0i69.3440
De Leger, D. Saint. (2009). Self-Assessment of speaking skills and participation in a foreign language class. Foreign Language Annals. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2009.01013.x
Forsyth, H., & Evans, J. (2019). Authentic assessment for a more inclusive history. Higher Education Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1581140
Goodwin, J. (2003). Students’ perspectives on debate exercises in content area classes. In Communication Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520302466
Grice, H. P. (1975). Grice (1975)- Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics 3: Speech arts.
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Bastioens, T. J. (2010). A Five-Dimensional Framework Authentic Assessment for. Educational Teachnology Research and Development.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, K. (2014). Cohesion in English. In Cohesion in English. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315836010
I.J., W., A., A., S., V., F., S., K.-K., L., P., J., J., D., D., D., & B.R., F. (2011). Effects of a Social-Emotional and Character Development Program on the Trajectory of Behaviors Associated with Social-Emotional and Character Development: Findings from Three Randomized Trials. Prevention Science.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. (1985). Classroom Conflict: Controversy Versus Debate in Learning Groups. American Educational Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312022002237
Kim, D., & Gilman, D. A. (2008). Effects of text, audio, and graphic aids in multimedia instruction for vocabulary learning. Educational Technology and Society.
Kinginger, C., & Wu, Q. (2018). Learning Chinese through Contextualized Language Practices in Study Abroad Residence Halls: Two Case Studies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190518000077
Korkmaz, S., & Korkmaz, Ş. Ç. (2013). Contextualization or De-contextualization: Student Teachers’ Perceptions about Teaching a Language in Context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.299
Kuat, F. (2009). Nilai-nilai adat Hibua Lamo dan implikasinya bagi pembangunan Halmahera Utara. Hein Dan Hibua Lamo.“Tobelo Pos” Menelusuri Jejak Kepemimpinannya, 53-74.
Lan, T. J. (2011). Heterogeneity, politics of ethnicity, and multiculturalism What is a viable framework for Indonesia? Wacana, Journal of the Humanities of Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.17510/wjhi.v13i2.24
Mahsun, M. S. (2014). Teks dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kurikulum 2013. In Teks dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indoensia Kurikulum 2013.
Muharom Albantani, A., & Madkur, A. (2018). Think Globally, Act Locally: The Strategy of Incorporating Local Wisdom in Foreign Language Teaching in Indonesia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.7n.2p.1
Mungmachon, M. R. (2012). Knowledge and Local Wisdom : Community Treasure. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science.
Musselman, E. G. (2004). Using Structured Debate to Achieve Autonomous Student Discussion. The History Teacher. https://doi.org/10.2307/1555673
Nakrowi, Z. S. (2018). Revitalisasi Budaya Hibualamo melalui Implementasi Teknik Pembelajaran Ethnodrama. 2, 18–25.
Nasional, K. P. (2010). Pengembangan pendidikan budaya dan karakter bangsa. Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pusat Kurikulum.
Parwati, N. N., Tegeh, I. M., & Mariawan, I. M. (2018). Integrating the Values of Local Wisdom into the Learning Model: Building Positive Student Character. In Educational Technology to Improve Quality and Access on a Global Scale. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66227-5_23
Plato. (2005). Plato: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus. In Loeb Classical Library.
Rasna, I. W., & Tantra, D. K. (2017). Reconstruction of Local Wisdom for Character Education through the Indonesia Language Learning: An Ethno-pedagogical Methodology. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0712.09
Ross, S. (1998). Self-assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229801500101
Roy, A., & Macchiette, B. (2005). Debating the issues: A tool for augmenting critical thinking skills of marketing students. Journal of Marketing Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475305280533
Sahin, M. C. (2009). Instructional design principles for 21st century learning skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.258
Snider, A., & Schnurer, M. (2006). Many sides : Debate Across the Curriculum. In International Debate Education Association.
Suryadi, A., & Tilaar. (1993). Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Swan, M. (2018). The Practice of English Language Teaching, 5th edition. ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx060
Tench, R. (2003). Stakeholder influences on the writing skills debate: A reflective evaluation in the context of vocational business education. Journal of Further and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877032000128118
Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer Assessment, Theory into Practise. In Theory Into Practice.
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument: Updated edition. In The Uses of Argument: Updated Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840005
Tsai, P. S., Tsai, C. C., & Hwang, G. H. (2016). The effects of instructional methods on students’ learning outcomes requiring different cognitive abilities: context-aware ubiquitous learning versus traditional instruction. Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1035730
Tumposky, N. R. (2004). The Debate Debate. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas. https://doi.org/10.3200/tchs.78.2.52-56
Viva.co.id. (2017). “Anies Baswedan Anggap Lawan Debat Sebagai Teman Berpikir.” https://www.viva.co.id/berita/metro/869753-anies-baswedan-anggap-lawan-debat-sebagai-teman-berpikir
Vo, H. X., & Morris, R. L. (2006). Debate as a Tool in Teaching Economics: Rationale, Technique, and Some Evidence. Journal of Education for Business. https://doi.org/10.3200/joeb.81.6.315-320
Yunian Putra, R. W., & Indriani, P. (2017). Implementasi Etnomatematika Berbasis Budaya Lokal dalam Pembelajaran Matematika pada Jenjang Sekolah Dasar. NUMERICAL (Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika). https://doi.org/10.25217/numerical.v1i1.118
Downloads
Published
2022-05-10
How to Cite
Nakrowi, Z. S. (2022). Revitalisasi Nilai Kearifan Lokal melalui Pembelajaran Debat Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 8(1), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v8i1.1726
License
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with Onoma Journal: Education, Languages??, and Literature agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
