DEVELOPMENT OF ECTA-T AND EMIS-T WITH A COMBINATION OF THREE-TIER AND CERTAINTY RESPONSE INDEX METHODS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CONCEPT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30605/biogenerasi.v11i1.8139Keywords:
Research & Development, Environmental literacy, Ecology, Misconception, Creative ThinkingAbstract
Environmental pollution is a problem that often occurs in the environment where we live, and requires the ability to think creatively to be able to solve it. The ability to think creatively in solving environmental problems is determined by their knowledge related to ecology. Therefore this study aims to create an instrument that can measure students' misconceptions (EMis-T) in ecological material and an instrument that can measure students' creative thinking skills (ECTA-T) in solving environmental problems. The research was conducted with reference to the Research and Development (R&D) method with the Borg & Gall (2003) development model which was modified into four development steps, including: (1) Preliminary study stage; (2) Development stage; (3) validation and trial stage; (4) Application Stage. The type of instrument developed is in the form of an essay type written test by combining the three tier test type and certainty response index. The objects that were used as targets for the development of this instrument were class X senior high school. Based on the results of the analysis it is known that the product that has been developed has valid criteria, medium high reliable value, no discriminating power which has a negative value, and questions that have an easy level of difficulty do not dominate, so this product can be used by educators to measure creative thinking skills and students' misconceptions about environmental material. The identified level of students' creative thinking ability was dominated by students in the high category. While the level of students' misconceptions that were identified were dominated by students in the low category.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, M., & Indana, S. (2018). Development of Student Misconception Test Instrumen Using Combination of Three-Tier Test and Certainty of Response Index on Animalia Kingdom Grade X High School. Bioedu Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 7(2), 119-128. Diakses dari https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/bioedu
Arikunto, S. & Safruddin, C. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi 2). Jakarta:Bumi Aksara.
Arslan, H. O., Cigdemoglu, C., & Moseley, C. A. (2012). Three-tier test to assess pre-service teacher’s misconceptions about global warming, greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion, and acid rain. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1667-1686. Diakses dari http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.680618
Bayrak, B. K. (2013). Using Two-Tier Test to Identify Primary Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Alternative Conceptions in Acid Base. Mevlana International Journal of Education, 3(2), 19-26. Diakses dari http://mije.mevlana.edu.tr/
Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2015). Skills for the 21st Century: What Should Students Learn?. Boston: Center for Curiculum Redesign.
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction Seventh Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
D’Avanzo, C. (2003). Application of research on learning to college teaching: ecological examples. Bio-Science, 53, 1121-1128. Diakses dari https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/
Grumbine, Richard. (2012). Can you build it? Using manipulatives to assess student understanding of food-web concepts. American Biology Teacher, 74(7), 518. DOI: 10.1525/abt.2012.74.7.16
Firman, F. (2016). Pengembangan Three Tier Tests untuk Mengidentifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas VII pada Materi Persamaan dan Pertidaksamaan Linear Satu Variabel. (Skripsi). Diakses dari http://eprints.unm.ac.id/6662/1.
Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., dan Mc Dermott, L. C. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Diagnostic Instrumens to Identify Students’ Misconceptions in Science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 11 (5), 989-1008. DOI: 10.12973/Eurasia.2015.1369a
Hasan, S., Bagayoko, D., & Kelley, Ella L. (1999). Misconceptions and The Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Physics Education, 34(5): 294-299. DOI:10.1088/0031-9120/34/5/304
Herlanti, Y. (2014). Tanya Jawab Seputar Penelitian Pendidikan Sains: Jawaban atas pertanyaan-pertanyaan mahasiswa tingkat akhir yang sering muncul dalam penelitian pendidikan sains. Jakarta: UIN Jakarta.
Ibrahim, M. (2019). Model Pembelajaran P2OC2R untuk Mengubah Konsepsi IPA Siswa. Sidoarjo: Zifatama Jawara.
Kartimi, & Liliasari. (2012). Pengembangan Alat Ukur Berpikir Kritis pada Konsep Termokimia untuk Siswa SMA Peringkat Atas dan Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA (JPPI), 1(1), 21-26. Diakses dari http://journal.ummes.ac.id/index.php/jpii
Lewinsohn, T. M., Attayde, J. L., Fonseca, C. R., Ganade, G., Jorge, L., R., Kollman, J., Overbenck, G. E., & Prado, I. P. (2014). Ecological literacy and beyond: problem-based learning for future professionals, AMBIO, 44, 154–162. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0539-2
Meitiyani, N., & Syaban, Ali. (2019). Membangun Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif untuk Mengatasi Masalah Lingkungan dengan Menggunakan Pembelajaran Otentik. EDUSAINS, 11(2), 297-302. Diakses dari http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/edusains
Munandar, Utami. (2012). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat, cet.Ke-3. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Munggoro, D. W., & Armansyah, A. (2007). Menjadi Enviromentalis itu Gampang!. Jakarta: WALHI.
Nofiana, M., Sajidan, & Puguh. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi Two-Tier Multiple Choice Question untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jurnal Inkuiri, 3(II), 60-74. Diakses dari http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/sains
Pesman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a Three-Tier Test to Assess Misconceptions About Simple Electric Circuits. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208-222. DOI:10.1080/00220670903383002
Prastiwi, L., Sigit, D. V., & Ristanto, R.H. (2020). Hubungan Antara Literasi Ekologi dengan Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Lingkungan di Sekolah Adiwiyata Kota Tangerang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, 11(1), 47-61. Diakses dari http://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/PMP
Purnami, W., Utama, W. G., & Madu, F. J. (2016). Internalisasi Kesadaran Ekologis Melalui Pengelolaan Sampah di Lingkungan Sekolah Dasar. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains, 487–49. Diakses dari media.neliti.com/media/publications
Putri, I. W. S., dkk,. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Kesebangunan di SMPN 11 Jember. Jurnal Edukasi, IV(3), 59. Diakses dari https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JEUJ/article/view/6310
Ratumanan, T.G., dan Laurens, T. (2006). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar yang Relevan dengan Kurikulum Berbasis Kompotensi. Surabaya: Unesa University Press.
Rosyana, W., dkk. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian Three-Tier Multiple Choice (Three-TMC) untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa pada Materi Kimia Larutan Penyangga Kelas XI SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 48-58. DOI: 10.20961/inkuiri.v8i1.31814
Sofyan, A., dkk. (2006). Evaluasi Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Stamp, N. (2018). Ecological Misconception, Survey III: The Challenge of Identifying Sophisticated Understanding. ESA Bulletin, 87(2), 168-175. DOI:10.1890/0012-9623
Sucia, A. H., Purwanto, agung, & Sucahyanto. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Ekoliterasi terhadap kemampuan Pemecahan Masalahh Lingkungan Peserta Didik, PLPB, XIX (2), 39-49. DOI: 10.21009/PLPB
Sukiman. (2012). Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi. Ypgyakarta: Insan Mandiri.
Suryadi, A. (2002). Pendidikan, Investasi SDM, dan Pembangunan. Jakarta: Balai Pusataka.
Susanto, A. (2011). Perkembangan Anak Usia Dini: Pengantar dalam berbagai aspeknya. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Talango, S. R. & Pratiwi, W. (2018). Asesmen Perkembangan Anak (Studi Kasus Asesmen Perkembangan Anak Usia 2 Tahun). Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(2), 49-60. Diakses dari https://journal.iaingorontalo.ac.id/index.php/
Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson, C. (2002). Assesing creativity: A Guide for Educators. Florida: University of Connecticut.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fitri Rizkiyah Rizkiyah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.
License and Copyright Agreement
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
.png)
