Strategi Asesmen untuk Mengukur Kompetensi Abad 21 dalam pemberalajaran biologi

Authors

  • Nila Amelia
  • Rahmawati Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Adnan Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30605/biogenerasi.v10i1.4858

Keywords:

Asesmen, Kompetensi Abad 21, Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS), Pembelajaran Biologi, Refleksi Diri

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas strategi asesmen dalam mengukur kompetensi abad 21 dalam pembelajaran biologi. Kompetensi abad 21, seperti berpikir kritis, kreativitas, komunikasi, dan kolaborasi, menjadi penting untuk dipelajari dalam menghadapi tantangan global yang semakin kompleks. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data berupa studi literatur, wawancara dengan guru biologi, dan observasi kelas. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan asesmen formatif, diagnostik, autentik, dan berbasis Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) sangat efektif dalam meningkatkan kemampuan analitis dan reflektif siswa. Asesmen formatif memberikan umpan balik yang berkelanjutan kepada siswa, sementara asesmen diagnostik membantu guru dalam menyesuaikan pembelajaran berdasarkan kebutuhan individu siswa. Asesmen autentik berbasis proyek dan tugas praktis memungkinkan siswa untuk mengaitkan teori dengan situasi nyata, sedangkan asesmen berbasis HOTS, seperti soal-soal analisis dan pemecahan masalah, efektif dalam menantang siswa untuk berpikir kritis. Selain itu, asesmen diri dan teman sebaya membantu meningkatkan kesadaran siswa akan kekuatan dan kelemahan mereka, serta mendorong tanggung jawab dan refleksi diri. Secara keseluruhan, strategi asesmen ini tidak hanya meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa, tetapi juga mempersiapkan mereka dengan keterampilan penting yang relevan dalam kehidupan dan karier mereka di masa depan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
Budiono, A., & Hatip, M. (2023). Asesmen Pembelajaran pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Axioma, 8(1), 109–123.
Chamidin, & Muhdi, A. (2022). Problematika Penerapan Kurikulum Merde.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth Generation Evaluation. SAGE Publications.
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2023). Authentic Assessment: Practices and Challenges in Modern Education. Educational Research Review, 17(2), 89-105.
Hamid, A. (2019). Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS).
McMillan, J. H. (2018). Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice for Effective Standards-Based Instruction. Pearson.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. SAGE Publications.
Putri, D. (2021). Assessment as Learning dalam Meningkatkan Kemandirian Siswa.
Rahman, B., et al. (2022). Pengertian Pendidikan, Ilmu Pendidikan, dan Unsur-Unsur Pendidikan.
Ridwan, A. S. (2019). Pembelajaran Berbasis HOTS Edisi Revisi: Higher Order Thinking Skills.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-09

How to Cite

Amelia, N. ., Rahmawati, & Adnan. (2024). Strategi Asesmen untuk Mengukur Kompetensi Abad 21 dalam pemberalajaran biologi. Jurnal Biogenerasi, 10(1), 437–442. https://doi.org/10.30605/biogenerasi.v10i1.4858

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): Volume 10 Nomor 1, Agustus 2024 - Februari 2025

Section

Articles

License

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  • They are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  • The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal.
  • That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  • That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  • They secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  • They agree to the following license and copyright agreement.

License and Copyright Agreement

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.